Sunday, July 08, 2018

Cambridge, MA, USA, City Council Specifies Environmental Destroyers to take Blame for Perhaps Imminent Destruction.

Cambridge, MA, USA, City Council Specifies Environmental Destroyers to take Blame for Perhaps Imminent Destruction.

1. Cambridge City Council flaunts contempt for responsible people in Charles River Planning.
2. Specific groups blocked.
3. The record of the designated appointees, and key members of the UNANIMOUS City Council.
4. What NINE MEMBERS OF the Cambridge City Council wants to destroy this time.
5. Standard Pattern.

1. Cambridge City Council flaunts contempt for responsible people in Charles River Planning.

The Cambridge City Council took a vote on its ongoing fight for destruction at Magazine Beach at its most recent meeting.  The Cambridge City Council, by its silence, reaffirmed support for massive and irresponsible tree destruction.  The Cambridge City Council, by its silence, reaffirmed support for the rerouting of poisons into the Charles River and onto its banks.  These poisons were introduced by Cambridge and the Department of Conservation and Recreation in the 2000's outrages.  The City Council, by its silence, reaffirmed support for ongoing and increasing heartless animal abuse including actual poisoning of resident animal population.  The City Council, by its silence, reaffirmed support for gentrification including changes which would make it more difficult for lower income people to use the park in the middle for barbeques.

And as part of the KNOW NOTHING policy, according to Councilor Devereux, the City Council recognizes as it Absolute Dictator, the woman who is currently leading the fight for all this destruction, and brags about actions which reroute poisons from the poison drainage pits on the Magazine Beach playing fields into the Charles / closer to it on its banks.

The City Council is looking for additional destruction on Magazine Beach, but, as usual, they are looking for somebody to blame it on besides themselves.  They want to keep environmental destroyers happy.  The environmental destroyers have revived the slogan under which Cambridge and their destructive state bedfellows just destroyed hundreds of trees between the BU and Longfellow Bridges.

So the Cambridge City Council has suggested that the City Manager appoint a committee stacked with proven destroyers, and, oh yeah, some “other stakeholders” of the City Manager / Development Department appointees.  Naturally, CDD appointees are carefully groomed to rubber stamps destroyers while sounding great.  The main basis for appointment appears to be a bad record.  People without bad records are kept in the minority.  Future appointments, of course, certainly do look like they are based on the record.

After I blasted this nonsense, the Cambridge City Council added the Department of Transportation as a designated adult in a meeting of destroyers.  Naturally, the responsible party will be outvoted by the destroyers / safe appointments.  Destroyers always vote in a block.

2. Specific groups blocked.

First of all, development related committees appointed by the City of Cambridge certainly look like they stem from recommendations from the extremely destructive Cambridge Development Department.  To the extent responsible people get appointed, they are kept in a minority, outvoted by “safe” votes, and tend to be not subsequently appointed should they behave in a manner not pleasing to the irresponsible CDD.

Cambridge has major committees on tree destruction and global warming.

The tree protection committees clearly excludes the trees NINE city councilors want to destroy on Magazine Beach.

“Global Warming” “protections” similarly exclude the massive tree destruction supported by the Cambridge City Council. 

BUT THEY SOUND GREAT, and, naturally, no responsible people on these committees will be appointed to this Committee to review additional destruction.

“Global Warming” reasonably includes concern about poisoning of waterways, part of the outrage at Magazine Beach by the current AND APPARENTLY PERMANENT rerouting of poisons into the Charles River and environs of poisons which should not even be used on a facility next to the Charles River.  No representation stated of people concerned about a clean Charles River.

BUT THE LEAD POISONER IS RECOGNIZED AS ABSOLUTE DICTATOR ON CHARLES RIVER MATTERS!!! (SHE MADE ME DO IT!!!!)

This recognition of a proven destroyer as an absolute dictator on Charles River matters replaces a failed attempt to blame the destruction on me.  I SHOULD HAVE KEPT THEM FROM DOING IT!!!!

* * * * *


Poison drainage blocked for rerouting of poisons into Charles River (above the black tarp).  Leader of destruction recognized by Cambridge City Council as their Absolute Dictator on Charles River matters.  This fulfills a standard Cambridge City "explanation":  SHE MADE ME DO IT.

* * * *

MEANINGFUL tree protectors, of course, are blocked.  They are routed into silly groups which are ordered to ignore the outrage on the Charles River.  But they are told what great work they are doing.

People who love the river are blocked.  Since they love the river, would be hostile to its being blocked from view by the bizarre Starvation Wall which has no meaningful purpose except to starve the 37 year resident Charles River White Geese.  Additionally they might want to know what the City Council just voted to spend $69,000 on at Magazine Beach.  That project stinks of more heartless animal abuse.  No MEANINGFUL representation.

Also blocked, of necessity are animal protectors.  Cambridge, the DCR and other fake protectors are deliberately starving the Charles River White Geese by blocking them from their food of most of the last 37 years with the starvation wall and whatever is hidden in the $69,000 vote which featured a plan which could not possibly be what the $69,000 is supposedly for.

Bees are dying at Magazine Beach from NINE City Councilor’s and DCR’s beloved poisons.

People concerned about the needy, and who oppose gentrification are blocked.  They would be outraged by the destruction of access by the needy to Magazine Beach for their barbeques.  OH YOU MEAN THAT DESTROYING THEIR PARKING WILL DRIVE AWAY THAT KIND OF PEOPLE!!!

PEOPLE WHO USE THE PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL.  No representation.

People who use Magazine Beach for passive recreation.  No representation.

People who use Magazine Beach for active representation.  No representation.

Residential neighbors.  No representation.

3. The record of the designated appointees, and key members of the UNANIMOUS City Council.

The most visible fighter for these outrages was Councilor Devereux.  She declared the proven, most destructive member of the community to be the Absolute Dictator to the Cambridge City Council on Charles River matters.  Devereux appears in a photo on line working in support of the Cambridge City Council’s $69,000 SECRET new construction which is almost certain to enhance the heartless animal abuse, starvation of the Charles River White Geese.  Devereux is almost certain NOT TO APPEAR in such a photo bragging about the 56 mostly excellent trees she is destroying.

For what it is worth, here are photos of destruction in the first round of outrages on the Charles River.




Mayor McGovern who was the apparent author of the outrageous vote of April 24, 2017, including the lie, “dead or dying” with regard to doomed trees was the only other member of the City Council, to my memory, MEANINGFULLY speaking in favor.

That is the latest vote supporting outrages and giving blank check to destructive people.

But they all voted for the outrage, and, by their silence, supported designating a proven and active environmental destroyer as their Absolute Dictator on Magazine Beach matters..

And, if they were proud of what they were doing, they would not be keeping it secret.  They would be bragging.

The cosponsor of the motion runs around Cambridge giving the impression he is protecting trees and otherwise for the environment.  I think he was silent.  In any case, Devereux loudly claims environmentalist status.  In Cambridge, loud proclamation of “environmentalism” from pols, has a distressing tendency to be false.

But their non stop nonsense, and the tiny but very visible organization, discourages responsible people from being meaningful, and from running against the destructive people lying about which side they are on.

And the key vote, April 24, 2017, order 1, was taken immediately following a rally on City Hall steps lying about environmental sainthood by the members of the Cambridge City Council who participated.

If you are looking for people MEANINGFULLY supporting the environment in Cambridge, MA, avoid the pols or the people on their lovely sounding committees.

And, oh yeah, the destroyers bragging about their heartless animal abuse is a propaganda show in City Hall Annex.




4. What NINE MEMBERS OF the Cambridge City Council wants to destroy this time.

And, oh yeah, here are a few examples of what NINE members of the Cambridge City Council want to destroy this time, and are desperately trying to shift the blame to the recognized Absolute Dictator or whomever else will work.

SHE MADE ME DO IT!!!!  YOU MADE ME DO IT!!!!  WHY DID YOU NOT STOP ME!!!!!






5. Standard Pattern.

She / they made me do it!  - THEN WHY NOT ELECT RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE?

You made me do it!!!!

Why did you not keep me from doing this terrible thing!!!!

I did not vote for that1

       VOTING FOR SECRET ACTIVITIES IS NOT WANTING TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE VOTING FOR, AND IS VOTING FOR ACTIVITIES TO BE KEPT FROM THE CONSTITUENTS UNTIL IT IS TOO LATE.

What about all my lovely committees / initiatives!

CAREFULLY CRAFTED FOR THE IMPRESSION, NOT THE REALITY, OF RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOR.

A truly reprehensible city government.