1. General.
2. Meeting for the key Alewife destroyer to lie to people.
3. Analysis of Call to Meeting.
4. Analysis of organizers.
1. General.
The reality of the very destructive situation in the City of Cambridge is that the tactics used to destroy the Core Alewife Reservation are not at all unusual.
The difference from the norm at Alewife is that the tactics and their result were so blatant.
The Cambridge Pols also aggressively create other “environmental” organizations. The common feature is that the Cambridge Pols keep their “environmental organizations” from meaningful concern for the environment.
Environmental destruction and heartless animal abuse which is so normal and so reprehensible among the government and elected officials of the City of Cambridge is kept out of meaningful discussion except to try to fool good people into fighting for environmental destruction or heartless animals abuse.
2. Meeting for the key Alewife destroyer to lie to people.
One of the fake environmental groups claims to be concerned about Cambridgeport. It has routinely suppressed meaningful discussion of the many outrages on the Charles River.
Tuesday night, January 17, they are giving the mike to the woman who ran around for 15 years loudly proclaiming that she was defending Alewife. She spent 15 years telling people to look at everything except for the totally unnecessary and totally avoidable plans of her friends for the destruction of the core Alewife reservation. Now she is running around praising the destruction of the core Alewife reservation.
These people and others helped her in her destruction of the core Alewife reservation exactly the way they are helping her pave over the destructiveness and irresponsibility of her achievement. They praised her as a responsible and progressive activist.
The following is their description of this latest fake presentation.
************
The main focus of this presentation will be the storm water wetlands restoration project. The impact of the proposed removal of the silver maple forest on the storm water project has not yet been scientifically established. The forum may include discussion of the silver maple forest and likely impacts of its removal, but with clarity that there is no scientific claim that removal of the forest will ruin the stormwater project.
*************
This presentation is the usual type of lie out of the Cambridge Machine.
3. Analysis of Call to Meeting.
Notice the euphemism “the removal of the forest” with regard to private property away from the core Alewife reservation. They do not even use this euphemism with regard to the destruction of the core Alewife reservation.
Nowhere is it mentioned that the “storm water wetlands restoration project” cannot achieve its publicly stated goals, that of protecting North Cambridge from massive storms.
North Cambridge needs protection from flooding as the result of major storms. Alewife has seen two fifty year storms in the past twenty years.
Their destruction of acres of excellent forest and killing of hundreds or thousands of resident animals will protect against two year storms.
There is a very big difference between protecting against the worst possible storm in 50 years and protecting against the worst possible storm in 2 years.
Nowhere is it mentioned that the goals of the “storm water wetlands restoration project” can easily be accomplished without massive destruction of an irreplaceable forest and mass killings of valuable animals. The storm water protection can be provided by building under the massive parking lot across the street, and by coordinating the storm water protection with office building construction there on air rights. But the developer will go forward with or without the storm water protection.
So the fake environmental protectors by sugar coating the current totally unnecessary destruction are working for further, larger destruction because the project will not work without further, larger destruction.
4. Analysis of organizers.
And the organizers will run around lying that they are environmental saints.
And the organizers will run around lying that the Cambridge government and elected officials are environmental saints.
As the civil rights judge said “reprehensible.”
Monday, January 16, 2012
Environmentally destructive “Conservancy” vows to fight on
1. General.
2. Mass Tree Destruction and Highway Initiatives on the Charles River.
3. Update on attempts at destruction.
1. General.
The destructive parties in Cambridge commonly fight for their ends through fake groups which give people the wrong impression of which side they are on.
The most recent example is the outrageous environmental destruction and mass animal killing in the Alewife reservation as part of supposed flood protection project which, upon close questioning, cannot achieve its stated ends. The project managers and friends do not want to know about the massive parking lot directly across the street, CambridgePark Drive which can achieve the flood control needs of Alewife.
Crucial in this destruction was a fake protective group which calls itself a protector of Alewife, and which spent 15 years telling well meaning people to look at everything except the totally avoidable destruction which has just been accomplished.
The correlative of this fake organization on the Charles River calls itself a Conservancy, and the use of the word “Conservancy” is a blatant lie.
This group, with major developer funding, including from Harvard, has been fighting for more than ten years for environmental destruction and the destruction of resident animals on the Charles River.
2. Mass Tree Destruction and Highway Initiatives on the Charles River.
The Charles River “Conservancy” was the lead in a fight for an outrageously irresponsible highway proposal in the Charles River and on its banks in Cambridge which would be built in the Charles under four historical bridges, the BU Bridge and bridges to its west, the River Street Bridge, and the Anderson Bridge plus under a pedestrian bridge between the last two bridges.
This outrageous proposal would increase the irresponsible environmental destruction at Magazine Beach, under the BU Bridge and in the goose meadow with corresponding increase in the heartless abuse of the valuable 30 year resident Charles River White Geese.
This proposal would be key in the decimation of an excellent 104 tree grove at the Memorial Drive split.
The highway proposal is key in the plans to destroy hundreds of trees between the BU Bridge and the Longfellow Bridge, the second bridge east of the BU Bridge.
This proposal would duplicate a small vehicle highway on the Boston side which sees overnight closings because of rapes and muggings.
Fortunately, responsible people have stepped in to interfere with the outrageously irresponsible City of Cambridge and Department of Conservation and Recreation.
Governor Patrick was provided with the DCR plans for the tree destruction as part of the DCR’s attempts to get Obama money for the tree destruction. The DCR was lying that all the trees were diseased. Their lie was proven by their own plans, filed with the City of Cambridge.
The irresponsible highway proposal was called “environmentally destructive” in a report by a joint committee of the Department of Transportation and Recreation and the DCR. Their report recommended against the new highway.
3. Update on attempts at destruction.
The fake “Conservancy” has not given up.
They have announced on their facebook page intention to conduct planning meetings to organize for their destructive efforts on the highway proposal in January and February.
They state: “CRC . . . will present the recommendations [of its organizing meetings] to Mass DOT at the 25% design presentation for the River Street and Western Avenue Bridge projects, anticipated for February.”
Their destructiveness is bad enough. The false name is even more outrageous.
2. Mass Tree Destruction and Highway Initiatives on the Charles River.
3. Update on attempts at destruction.
1. General.
The destructive parties in Cambridge commonly fight for their ends through fake groups which give people the wrong impression of which side they are on.
The most recent example is the outrageous environmental destruction and mass animal killing in the Alewife reservation as part of supposed flood protection project which, upon close questioning, cannot achieve its stated ends. The project managers and friends do not want to know about the massive parking lot directly across the street, CambridgePark Drive which can achieve the flood control needs of Alewife.
Crucial in this destruction was a fake protective group which calls itself a protector of Alewife, and which spent 15 years telling well meaning people to look at everything except the totally avoidable destruction which has just been accomplished.
The correlative of this fake organization on the Charles River calls itself a Conservancy, and the use of the word “Conservancy” is a blatant lie.
This group, with major developer funding, including from Harvard, has been fighting for more than ten years for environmental destruction and the destruction of resident animals on the Charles River.
2. Mass Tree Destruction and Highway Initiatives on the Charles River.
The Charles River “Conservancy” was the lead in a fight for an outrageously irresponsible highway proposal in the Charles River and on its banks in Cambridge which would be built in the Charles under four historical bridges, the BU Bridge and bridges to its west, the River Street Bridge, and the Anderson Bridge plus under a pedestrian bridge between the last two bridges.
This outrageous proposal would increase the irresponsible environmental destruction at Magazine Beach, under the BU Bridge and in the goose meadow with corresponding increase in the heartless abuse of the valuable 30 year resident Charles River White Geese.
This proposal would be key in the decimation of an excellent 104 tree grove at the Memorial Drive split.
The highway proposal is key in the plans to destroy hundreds of trees between the BU Bridge and the Longfellow Bridge, the second bridge east of the BU Bridge.
This proposal would duplicate a small vehicle highway on the Boston side which sees overnight closings because of rapes and muggings.
Fortunately, responsible people have stepped in to interfere with the outrageously irresponsible City of Cambridge and Department of Conservation and Recreation.
Governor Patrick was provided with the DCR plans for the tree destruction as part of the DCR’s attempts to get Obama money for the tree destruction. The DCR was lying that all the trees were diseased. Their lie was proven by their own plans, filed with the City of Cambridge.
The irresponsible highway proposal was called “environmentally destructive” in a report by a joint committee of the Department of Transportation and Recreation and the DCR. Their report recommended against the new highway.
3. Update on attempts at destruction.
The fake “Conservancy” has not given up.
They have announced on their facebook page intention to conduct planning meetings to organize for their destructive efforts on the highway proposal in January and February.
They state: “CRC . . . will present the recommendations [of its organizing meetings] to Mass DOT at the 25% design presentation for the River Street and Western Avenue Bridge projects, anticipated for February.”
Their destructiveness is bad enough. The false name is even more outrageous.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)