Addendum: In addition to the response to neutral comment, please note the following City of Cambridge photo bragging of the destruction of the Cambridge City Council of 3.4 acres of the Alewife Reservation behind 165 CambridgePark Drive at Alewife in Cambridge.
The trees in the background occupied the ENTIRE area of this photograph before the Cambridge City Council’s mass logging and pogrom of the animal residents.
0. Introduction.
1. Good guy comment.
a. Comment.
b. Response:
2. Neutral comment.
a. Comment.
b. Response:
(1) Introduction.
(2) Malvina Monteiro.
(3) Environment.
(4) Heartless animal abuse.
3. YouTube postings.
a. Civil rights / ethics in government / environmental destruction.
b. Destruction on the Cambridge Common.
0. Introduction.
Two good responses to the latest Cheung report. Yahoo “improvements” are such that I cannot be positive that these are all that were sent. The Yahoo “improvements” create an opaque situation with regard to responses. I have to open files which look like there is no need to open in order to find responses, and, even then, I am not positive that I have seen all the responses.
I would love to get any comments I missed. I would love to get my actual response to comment 2. And I would love to get additional comments.
The most effective way to communicate to me would be free standing emails to boblat@yahoo.com, not as replies.
1. Good guy comment.
a. Comment.
Wouldn't it be wonderful to have maps of Cambridge trees through the decades showing the tree loss?
On a positive note; there is now a directory of street trees;
if it's updated through the years we may see what is happening...
It's amazing to see the quickly erected apartments at Fresh Pond and Porter Square, to appreciate what the increased density means in terms of noise and litter and absence of trees...
B. Response:
I have not seen the directory.
One thing which is clear is that it would bless the current outrageous destruction on all counts.
Destroying Alewife would be legal. Destroying the Charles River would be legal. Destroying the Cambridge Common would be legal.
And all would be hidden from sight by a document which gives the impression of being responsible but which rewards destructiveness of a reprehensible government by its apparent sanctity and very real hiding of reality.
[ed: One of the key techniques of lying used by the Cambridge government is secret definitions of key terms. All of the ongoing destruction is outside the secret definition of “street trees.”]
2. Neutral comment.
a. Comment.
Bob
Can you tell us if his opponent for Lt Governor, [omitted by editor] is any better?
b. Response:
[Ed: I thought I saved my response, but I do not see it. Let us give it another try.]
(1) Introduction.
The absolute horror of the situation in Cambridge, MA, is not just the outrageous misbehavior or the direct results of the outrageous misbehavior. It is, much worse, the loud insistence that the corrupt world in Cambridge, MA is some sort of ideal for the rest of the world to emulate.
The fact of the Cheung candidacy exactly fits the concept that the Cambridge government is something to take pride in.
(2) Malvina Monteiro.
Healy destroyed the life of Malvina Monteiro in retaliation for her filing a civil rights complaint.
Exactly ZERO then sitting members of the Cambridge City Council publicly (to my knowledge) expressed even the slightest distress about the matters mentioned in repeated and very loud court findings. Those findings consistently expressed flat out disgust and contempt for Robert Healy.
Two well deserving then sitting city councilors probably have been fired by the electorate over this outrage. Seven were not, and four replacements are in place.
This is not a matter to take lightly. This is a matter of corrupt politics at its worst.
A woman’s life was destroyed because she filed a civil rights / women’s rights complaint and, out of nine city councilors, there were exactly ZERO expressions (to my knowledge) of distress at this outrage in any form. This is in the face of very strong comments from the courts.
The Courts: “Reprehensible.” “Ample evidence . . . of outrageous misbehavior.”
Nine City Councilors: Absolutely ZERO.
(3) Environment.
Massive environmental destruction by people lying that they are environmental saints? The destruction is horrible. The lies make it that much worse.
(4) Heartless animal abuse.
Heartless animal abuse, heartless animal abuse, heartless animal abuse.
On general principal:
a. Civil rights / ethics in government / environmental destruction.
http://youtu.be/_5AvCUULcXo
b. Destruction on the Cambridge Common.
http://youtu.be/FgQ9ojVuMxM.
