1. Damnable “protective” entities persist in destruction. Stage 1.
2. Damnable “protective” entities persist in destruction. Stage 2.
3. The legislature tries to protect the Charles River from the vile MDC.
4. Damnable “protective” entities persist in destruction. Stage 3.
5. Technical details to follow, one photo.
1. Damnable “protective” entities persist in destruction. Stage 1.
Over the past month or so, there has been considerable “concern” expressed over the dead situation on the Charles River, a massive presence of algae.
The algae blight stems back to the first year the “right kind of people” conducted a “Charles River Swim.”
The “right kind of people” persist in constant nonsensical proclamations along with assisting very major destruction.
The biggest problem on the Charles River are destructive state and Cambridge governmental agencies patting each other on the back and sharing in making things worse.
These entities see nothing wrong with dumping poisons on the banks of the Charles River.
The algae blight stems back to their beloved poisons. Before these destructive people started poisoning Magazine Beach, the Metropolitan District Commission / Department of Conservation and Reservation got frustrated with the failure of its beloved poisons at Ebersol Fields on the Boston side of the Charles River near Massachusetts General Hospital.
The MDC / DCR addressed their problem. They dumped more poisons on Ebersol Fields. These poisons were marked “Do not use near water.”
THE NEXT DAY, the Charles River was dead from Boston Harbor to the Mass. Ave. Bridge. The Mass. Ave. Bridge is the second bridge outbound from Ebersol Fields and the bridge before the BU Bridge. The BU Bridge is next to the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese, and just before the REPEATEDLY attacked Magazine Beach.
As predicted at the time of the first algae infestation, the Algae infestation recurred annually, a day at a time.
2. Damnable “protective” entities persist in destruction. Stage 2.
In the 2000's, the MDC / DCR along with the City of Cambridge, “improved” Magazine Beach. Key parts of the “improvements” directly violated their beloved “Charles River Master Plan.” The violations were heartless abuses of the Charles River White Geese, designed to starve them and to poison them.
For the first time, poisons beloved to the MDC / DCR and the City of Cambridge were dumped on the banks of the Charles River at Magazine Beach.
These destructive people had a solution. They spent money putting in drainage pits (swails) to drain off poisons they should not be using on the banks of the Charles River. These drainage facilities, in addition to providing money for contractors, drained off poisons which should not even be used on the banks of the Charles River.
3. The legislature tries to protect the Charles River from the vile MDC.
The legislature destroyed the MDC and split its responsibilities on the Charles River with the Department of Conservation and Recreation and the Department of Transportation.
The “planners” the legislature were trying to protect the Charles River from moved to the DCR with their vile plans.
They, together with the City of Cambridge, have done terrible things on the Charles River.
The Department of Transportation has been the adult in the room. It has stood up to the vile DCR and Cambridge on key attempted outrages.
4. Damnable “protective” entities persist in destruction. Stage 3.
There are a lot more outrages than the one which is the subject of this post. To avoid writing a book, this post is primarily concerned with the ongoing poisoning of the Charles River.
The DCR, Cambridge and friends blocked the drainage pits. The key person is constantly praised by the Cambridge City Council. She has been called their “kind of activist” from the floor of the City Council. She has a very bad record of telling people not to look at outrages. She, in fact, has a pattern of praising outrages WHILE KEEPING THE DESTRUCTIVENESS SECRET.
With regard to the poisoning of the Charles, she has managed the blocking of the poison drainage using “volunteers” apparently supplied by the DCR. Decent people assuming that vile entities who are praised for the opposite of their record, are responsible people.
And they assume that the praisers are also worthy of respect. After all, do they not run around bragging about their sainthood.
So the poisons which were being drained off by the EXPENSIVELY CREATED drainage pits have been blocked from the drainage pits.
There is only one place for the poisons to go, the Charles River.
And the Charles River is now dead for something like a month, poisoning living beings who drink from it.
5. Technical details to follow, one photo.
Here is a photo of the blocking of the poison drainage WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE. PHOTOS CAN BE PROVIDED of Cambridge assistance, and I believe I have seen the assistance documented by the City Manager to the City Council.
This photo was taken on December 7, 2017. The time this added outrage took to destroy the Charles River seems proportional.
Nature stands up to outrages as much as it can, even from people falsely calling themselves environmental saints. Nature does not listen to nonsensical propaganda, but nature can only withstand so much destruction.
