March 23 2019, Pulled after 5 hits, refiled April 9, 2019, 4:54 am
I. General Introduction.
1. Introduction.
2. Our June 6, 2017 analysis of destruction plans 3, overview.
3. The Little Guys’ Parking Lot.
4. Summary.
II. Part 3. Destruction of the Little Guys’ Parking Lot, and all but one tree in it.
III. Massive Tree Destruction and Funding Games, Coming Magazine Beach Destruction, part 4.
I. General Introduction.
This started with part 3. I caught a narrow glitch. So put out Part 4. The combination is the story.
So here comes the original, then the change.
II. Part 3. Destruction of the Little Guys’ Parking Lot, and all but one tree in it.
Once again, passing on a letter to the Cambridge City Council and the City Manager.
These letters are developing into a replacement for evaluations posted on this blog. The difference is that they get made part of the Cambridge, MA, official record in the process.
Letter addressed to the Cambridge City Council and City Manager, received on March 28, 2019 by the City Manager and, for the City Council by the City Clerk who will pass it on to the Cambridge City Council next Monday, April 1, 2019.
What it does is go much further into evaluation of the formerly SECRET funding plans of the Department of Conservation and Recreation and evaluates them as rather clearly more Fraud on the Cambridge Voters.
The nominal purpose is to pass on the pages of the Destruction plans of the DCR blessed by the Cambridge City Council for the lovely little guys’ parking lot in the middle of the Magazine Beach playing fields.
This destruction greatly gentrifies the facility by keeping away from it people whom the “right kind of people” might consider below the appropriate station for such a beautiful facility. And, of course, in the process, achieving very major environmental destruction which the Cambridge City Council DOES NOT WANT TO KNOW ABOUT.
1. Introduction.
2. Our June 6, 2017 analysis of destruction plans 3, overview.
3. The Little Guys’ Parking Lot.
4. Summary.
Gentlemen / Ladies:
1. Introduction.
It is so very scary to recognize the very destructive reality behind the Cambridge City Council’s lovely claims of environmental sainthood. This follows upon two letters presenting excerpts from my June 7, 2017 analysis of the Cambridge City Council’s April 24, 2017 order 1 blank check to the Department of Conservation and Recreation for its outrageous destruction plans at Magazine Beach.
* * * * * *
The Magazine Beach park. The Cambridge City Council wants perhaps 30 trees in this park destroyed along with the little guys’ parking lot in the front facing Memorial Drive, including every tree but one in that parking lot. Gentrification and massive environmental destruction. This report is the little guys’ parking lot. Magnificent trees behind the little guys’ parking lot, with associated funding fraud details, will be presented in the next report..
* * * * * *
We have had a major change in the no longer SECRET knowledge about pending / imminent destruction, with the filing by the Cambridge City Council’s “kind of activist” of the DCR plans for division of moneys in the destruction at Magazine Beach to allow the Cambridge City Council’s nonsensically claims of innocence.
Here, once again, is the previously SECRET DCR plans for funding games.
We are having problems with translation of the original into blog view. Sometimes the full map translates. Sometimes, it does not. So we are publishing first the full map. Then we are publishing it in thirds right (generally west), middle (the park), left (generally east).
Looking over this outrage more closely, it would appear that the Cambridge City Council will be designated to pay for areas 1 and 2, to allow the voter fraud of claims of “innocence” with regard to massive and highly irresponsible tree destruction in areas 3 and 4.
What happens to the doomed trees in area 1 would appear to be still secret. Will the Cambridge City Council pay for that destruction, this time claiming stupidity? Will the DCR do it later?
Or have our publicizing this reprehensible proposal saved some excellence?
Compare, however, the line between areas 2 and 4 to the right of the pool.
There is nothing complicated about this line. The DCR and the Cambridge City Council are NOT destroying the line of trees immediately to the right of the pool area. The DCR and the Cambridge City Council ARE destroying the SECOND line of EXCELLENT trees to the right of the pool area.
The line between area 2 and area 4 is placed BETWEEN THE TWO ROWS OF TREES!
The area to the left of the line will be assigned to the Cambridge City Council funding AND WILL NOT BE DESTROYED. The area to the right of the line will be assigned to DCR funding AND WILL BE DESTROYED.
Lying through funding, fraud on the voters.
My reference of compass directions in this report have been persuasively communicated to me as deficient by Phil Barber. I have a problem in that I too often believe the self-proclaimed “experts” and it too often comes back to haunt me. There is a convention by which maps commonly have NORTH at the top. The “experts” in their maps of Magazine Beach, have NORTHEAST at the top. I mistakenly believed them and missed OCCASIONAL tiny explanations in fine print. So my compass references are frequently wrong. Phil’s references are correct. The top of ALL plans are northeast in reality.2. Our June 6, 2017 analysis of destruction plans 3, overview.
This chart organizes our presentation of the Area 1 / 2 / 3 /4 fraud on the voters arrangement of funding. It presents the now THICK Magazine Beach Park bounded on the north by Memorial Drive, on the south by the Charles River, generally on the east by the pedestrian overpass (and the area south of it is included) and on the west by the Swimming Pool area.
These pages present ONLY the little guys DOOMED parking lot, the area at the top left of this chart. The beauty of this nearly totally doomed area is indisputable. We will later present the truly massive and doomed trees below it which are being divided between areas 2 and 4 by the DCR to simplify the lie that the Cambridge City Council is behaving responsibly.
When viewing this excellent AND NEARLY TOTALLY DOOMED little park, one good comparison is the thick park nearest Harvard Square on the Cambridge Common destroyed by the Cambridge City Council. Those trees included trees which were larger than THESE particular trees.
The trees behind these particular trees, the ones shown in the prior two reports, and many of those in coming reports are MUCH LARGER.
The Cambridge City Council is demonstrating its very true vileness.
3. The Little Guys’ Parking Lot.
4. Summary.
In a subsequent letter I will pick up with groupings which followed the above. This current letter has presented the destruction of the Little Guys’ Parking Lot including all but one of the trees in it. After running this series to the western (actually northern) extremity, I will return to the beginning of the June 6, 2017 letter.
Planned destruction of the Little Guys’ Parking Lot is an excellent example of gentrification because this is where the little guys’ park to picnic in this CURRENTLY excellent park. So, in yet another field, the Cambridge City Council has only to look in a mirror to identify part of the problem.
I regret that there are so many erroneous plans in distribution with regard to apparent compass directions that I am rather forced to use the “expert’s”erroneous presentation of north to minimize confusion.
Reality again, not what is being pitched by the Cambridge City Council.
III. Massive Tree Destruction and Funding Games, Coming Magazine Beach Destruction, part 4.
Gentlemen / Ladies:
On Monday, April 1, 2019, I will be appearing in the shooting of part of a series TV show in central Massachusetts in my capacity as a SAG AFTRA performer.
It thus appears unlikely that I will be able to be in Cambridge City Hall on Monday. Accordingly I will mail this communication in hard copy, and it probably will arrive on Monday. Plus, I will scan this communication and send the resulting files as email attachments to the City Manager, City Clerk and City Council. Emailing with be in two parts to be certain to avoid overloading your system.
There is a letter from me in the April 1, 2019, communications primarily concerned with the destruction of the excellent little guys’ parking lot in the thick Magazine Beach park. This destruction is supported by the Cambridge City Council. The letter includes introductory language concerning what amounts to voter fraud in the allocation of funds for this project. I reaffirm that position.
The reason I am writing is that I have discovered a POSSIBLE error in the boundaries of the district arrangements. These funding districts are designed to fool the voters.
While my June 6, 2017 letter is fully accurate, I had an error of boundaries in my implementation in my letter already in the communications. My memory at the time of writing this latest letter had the lines of trees adjacent to the swimming pool reversed.
The key factor is the massive trees which the Cambridge City Council and the DCR are destroying which are generally east of the swimming pool proper and generally south of the DOOMED little guys’ parking lot and trees.
Additional factors are that
1. As is very much too normal, DCR plans are confusing, and
2. THE REALLY HORRIBLE STUFF IS KEPT AS SECRET AS POSSIBLE, combined with
3. SIMULTANEOUS NON STOP NONSENSICAL PRAISE OF THE PROJECT WHICH KEEPS THE DESTRUCTIVE STUFF SECRET.
I am not one of the tiny number of people fighting for AND PRAISING this outrage while keeping the bad stuff secret.
I am just a person trying to communicate the terrible stuff which is kept secret as best I can, and as best as I can figure out the obfuscations.
The key is with regard to the trees generally east of the swimming pool and generally south of the little guys’ parking lot.
That key is the two truly massive trees slated for destruction along with neighboring excellent trees not as large.
This part of the destruction plans is on page 4. The two massive doomed trees are the EXTREMELY large circles. The black and white version has X’s in the circles to indicate destruction. The colored version shows these doomed trees colored yellow with red circles. Two less large trees are in the area of the two massive trees It is my understanding that size of depiction is intended to be proportionate to tree size.
My confusion lay in the plans to destroy trees next to the swimming pool, the X’d out circles in the black and white, and colored circles WITHOUT RED CIRCLES next to the swimming pool. I was thinking that this row of trees, rather than being the first row from the swimming pool was the second row. The plans call for no destruction in the second row. I reversed the rows.
The plans call for the destruction of these excellent trees with the DCR essentially admitting that it has no responsible justification for destroying them.
The red circles are an example of skilled fraud misusing normal words way beyond their normal meaning and, REALLY, beyond their meaning as jargon. The fraudulently misused word is “decline.”
“Decline” means that the tree has reached its peak of excellence and is ONE DAY BEYOND ITS PEAK OF EXCELLENCE, NO MATTER HOW EXCELLENT IT CONTINUES TO BE.
Trees so marked may “only” have another fifty years to live, should they have a life span of one hundred years.
The position of right to destroy is outrageous, but that position is the DCR’s position with regard to these trees AND WITH REGARD TO OTHER MASSIVE TARGETED TREES in the Magazine Beach reservation.
The SECRET plan of the DCR for allocation of funding is truly impossible to interpret as to the exact line of admitted excellent trees generally east of the swimming pool which the DCR’s filed plans say the DCR and the Cambridge City Council intend to destroy. I assumed that the City Council funding line included the first row of trees because that would fit the fraudulent funding games. It is entirely possible that the City Council funding line includes none of these trees. It is also possible that the DCR had a bout of conscience and decided to be responsible and not destroy these trees which the DCR admits are healthy trees.
This destruction would be similar to the reality with regard to perhaps a majorioty of the hundreds of threes destroyed by the DCR and Cambridge east of the BU Bridge in January 2016, and reflective, once again, of a disposition which renders the DCR unfit for its responsibilities on the Charles River.
So, in summary, in the letter already in the 4/1/19 communications, I tried to understand the DCR’s plans, but I got the exact boundary line wrong.
The key point is that the DCR and Cambridge City Council are playing funding games to shield the Cambridge City Council from well deserved responsibility for outrageous destruction. And that the outrageous destruction includes TWO REALLY MASSIVE TREES in this area.
In any case, here are the previously SECRET DCR funding plan, and the relevant pages from the June 6, 2017 letter which the City Council does not want to know about. These pages concern the area of the Magazine Beach Park generally south of the DOOMED little guys’ parking lot WITH ALL BUT ONE OF ITS TREES TO BE DESTROYED, and generally east of the swimming pool. The previously SECRET DCR funding plan.
The relevant pages from the June 6, 2017 letter.
I will be thinking of you in Central Massachusetts.
My exact hours on Monday are impossible to predict. The last time I reported for a movie in Central Massachusetts, I was told at about 9 pm the prior evening that I would have to report for the gig at 4 am. My work days have been as long as 16 hours, only exceeding 16 hours once. 10 to 13 hours is common. We find out the end of the day when they tell us to go home.
Sincerely,
Robert J. La Trémouille
Chair
Selected Relatively Recent Related Materials
1. Multiple instances of large scale tree destruction at Fresh Pond by Cambridge Water Department.
Citations will be provided.
2. Destruction of 3.4+ acres of Silver Maple Forest at Alewife by Cambridge City Council and DCR
Citations will be provided.
3. Destruction of thick woods on Cambridge Common nearest Harvard Square by Cambridge City Council.
Citations will be provided.
4. The Destruction of Memorial Drive, January 2016, final cut (by Cambridge and the DCR, 30 minute video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTplCCEJP7o
5. Trailer for #4, 5 minute video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0iEFypDt8k&t=18s
6. Nature and Beauty Ripped Out on the Charles River (Analysis of achievements by #1, international expert, 30 minute video)
https://youtu.be.com/dWyCdcWMuAA
7. City Council vote in praise and support of DCR planned destruction at Magazine Beach, April 24, 2017
http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1782&Inline=True, page 309 and 310
8. 51 page analysis of DCR filed plans for Magazine Beach with OFFICIALLY FILED plan details and photos of target trees, June 6, 2017, provided twice to Cambridge City Council
http://focrwg.com/agenda1.html
9. Destruction at MicroCenter in implementation of City Council blank check (#7), increases supported destruction to 56 trees, August 7, 2017
http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1825&Inline=True, pages 151 to 157
10. Multiple objections to destruction of Vellucci Park in Inman Square
Too many to individually cite
11. Analysis of City Council fake Tree Protections to Cambridge City Council, March 18, 2019
http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=2033&Inline=True, pages 141 to 143
12. Report of Large Scale City of Cambridge Tree Destruction at Huron Ave & Fresh Pond Pkwy, almost certainly Water Department. Communication 3, 3/25/19
http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=2033&Inline=True, page 144
13. Response to Destruction achieved and planned by Cambridge City Council at Riverbank, Samples of reality at Magazine Beach #2, March 18, 2019.
http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=2033&Inline=True, pages 145 to 162
Sincerely,
Robert J. La Trémouille
Chair
