1. A good friend: Why publicize the Charles River “Conservancy”’s Money?
2. Editor’s Reply.
1. A good friend: Why publicize the Charles River “Conservancy”’s Money?
A good friend posted the following question on facebook in response to our partial posting of the funders of the Charles River “Conservancy.”
*********
Robert, I am not clear what this posting is about! Plz clarify in simple terms. The White Geese at the Charles R extremely important 2 me.--thank u Robert!
2. Editor’s Reply.
This posting is a direct response to the posting concerning Sea World below.
The Sea World destruction very closely fits the attacks on the Charles River.
There are a lot of “non profits” whose behavior is destructive.
Some, like the Charles River “Conservancy” are blatant falsehoods. This group is belligerently destructive of the environment. There is a very real problem with groups claiming to be holier than thou who really are not.
The very big problem is their fooling well meaning people into hurting the cause they claim to stand for.
Like so many activists in Cambridge, it is impossible to tell the difference, at face value, from the knaves and those who have been fooled.
One way to try to do so is follow the money.
The good guys will run away from groups running false colors. The bad guys will stay there.
Another interesting point in the funders are the educational institutions which benefit greatly and have been quite active in environmental destruction on the Charles River. These institutions very consistently lie to their students about their environmental destructiveness. Their false colors are a very major factor in fooling well meaning people into destroying the environment.
