Fake Neighborhood Association presents fake minutes on their latest meeting.

1. General.
2. Failure to mention the fake history of Magazine Beach and the Nesting Area which omitted the last 12 years.
3. Report omitted on the accelerating destruction at the Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
4. Report on moneys for the foot of Magazine Beach fails to mention the fought for destruction of the tiny parking lot so valuable to that part of Magazine Beach.
5. Stacked survey whose responses, even with the stacking, damned the destruction on the Charles River omitted.
6. On line honest report.
7. Cooing about the environmentally destructive Mayor Davis and the environmentally destructive Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
8. Prediction.
9. Summary.


1. General.

Last evening, June 4, 2012, the fake neighborhood association submitted its fake report on the most recent “meeting” of the group.

As usual, when dealing with the Cambridge Machine, the most important stuff is the omissions. After all, the Cambridge Pols lie through omissions that Cambridge and its fake groups are worthy of the respect they insist they deserve.

2. Failure to mention the fake history of Magazine Beach and the Nesting Area which omitted the last 12 years.

Key in the lies of omission was the failure to report on their presentation of a fake history of Magazine Beach and area. This is the fake history which did not include the record of the last twelve years and the shouting down of me when I tried to go into the last twelve years.

3. Report omitted on the accelerating destruction at the Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.

Another lie of omission was the praise of one of their key people for the infliction of a soon to be impenetrable thicket on the Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese, her cooing at it beauty, and the shouting down of me when I pointed out that they are inflicting on the nesting area the same outrage which currently walls off the Charles River.

4. Report on moneys for the foot of Magazine Beach fails to mention the fought for destruction of the tiny parking lot so valuable to that part of Magazine Beach.

A report was made on the obtaining of funds to destroy the parking lot at the foot of Magazine Street needed for public access to the picnic area there and to the historical building there. Naturally, the part about the destruction of the parking lot was omitted as usual. The code words for destruction were used. Since they constantly lie by omission it is impossible to tell if a miracle occurred and the parties involved became decent human beings.

5. Stacked survey whose responses, even with the stacking, damned the destruction on the Charles River omitted.

Another lie of omission was their report on a survey they took on Magazine Beach. The survey did not make it into the report.

The survey, of course, was stacked, at minimum by the non stop lies that the situation at Magazine Beach is one to be proud of. Magazine Beach is still beautiful. The lies come from the mention of the beauty without mentioning the irresponsible destruction of the past twelve years. The destruction only did harm. The relatively few things good done in the last 12 years could have been done without the destruction.

And all the destruction was accomplished through lies or lies of omission.

The responses to the stacked survey they made on Magazine Beach were made without mentioning the fact that it was stacked.

Even with the stacking of the survey, the responses included a lot of people objecting to the wall of introduced bushes which prevent access to and from the Charles River / Magazine Beach. That was censored since the entire report was censored.

There was also strong comment during the discussions that small boats should be allowed to dock off Magazine Beach. I commented that the destruction of the last twelve years renders a boat dock useless which had been used for the better part of a century.

6. On line honest report.

My report on many lies of omission and other outrages at that meeting is posted at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/meeting-of-fake-neighborhood.html.

7. Cooing about the environmentally destructive Mayor Davis and the environmentally destructive Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The thing which really stands out is part of their report on a presentation put on by the most environmentally destructive member of the Cambridge City Council, Mayor Davis who very much non stop lies that she is an environmental saint.

The key part read:

**********

The Mayor is not only promoting sustainability efforts within Cambridge city properties but also working with Harvard and MIT to create and export best green practices and sustainability innovations.

**********

I cannot comment on the accuracy of comments on THIS PERSON’s presentation since I did not dignify her comments with my presence, however, with regard to the glowing report on MIT’s green practices, please see my report posted at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/mit-reaffirms-support-for-destruction.html, concerning MIT’s public meeting on May 24, 2012. During that meeting MIT clearly communicated that MIT supports the destruction of hundreds of excellent trees on Memorial Drive next to the Charles River. This is the fake group’s idea of positive green practices.

At that meeting, MIT also praised the fake neighborhood association’s fight to keep up and expand the heartless animal abuse and environmental destruction at Magazine Beach and the Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese. The form was the usual bit of knaves praising knaves and lying by omission.

8. Prediction.

I would anticipate that the lies of “concern” for Magazine Beach will stop abruptly after they have succeeded in destroying the parking at the foot of Magazine Street, after suppressing outrage on the introduction of the soon to be impenetrable thicket in place of thirty years of nests at the Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.

The fake group has suppressed objection to irresponsible behavior at Magazine Beach and the Nesting Area for almost all of its existence by ignoring it. They have nothing new to destroy, so they will return to support of irresponsible behavior by silence when they should be yelling.

This would parallel their part of the destruction at Alewife. They spent years helping it by telling people to talk with the fake group fighting for that destruction. Once destruction was in place, this fake group suddenly decided it had nothing to do with Alewife. That made any comments about the environmental destruction and mass animal killing out of order.

Afterthought: I said "lies of 'concern'". It is very hard to call an expression of concern a lie. However, when you combine the expression of concern with claims of wanting to make improvements, and combine that with suppression of the very real fact that the most important need for improvements is to undo the totally inexcusable destruction of the last twelve years, that is not concern in the minds of normal people.

9. Summary.

These controlled groups and their lies and lies of omission are a key reason Cambridge, MA, USA continues to be a corrupt world whose reality is strikingly different from what its many fake organizations present to the public. The report on the meeting fits the standard technique of lying to the public, presenting a world of saints whose relation to reality depends on whether or not you are interested in reality.