1. Introduction.
2. Michael Sullivan.
3. Leland Cheung.
4. Summary.
1. Introduction.
There is one extremely bad candidate running for Lieutenant Governor on the Massachusetts ballot, Leland Cheung. On the Middlesex County ballot, he is joined by District Attorney candidate Michael Sullivan.
2. Michael Sullivan.
Sullivan started the ongoing environmental outrages in and around Cambridge by voting to fund the outrageous destruction on the Magazine Beach playing fields. It was a blank check with a lot of lies, but he voted for it.
He very clearly knew about the intent to severely harm the Charles River White Geese. They have been starved and driven from their home of most of the last 33 years. Poisons have been dumped on the playing fields. Playing fields have been destroyed to drain off the poisons which should not be there in the first place.
This comports with the goal of the Department of Conservation and Recreation to kill off or drive away all resident animals, a goal they lied about with constant claims of “No intent” to harm the Charles River White Geese.
Sullivan is running for district attorney. Given his heartless record on the Charles River White Geese, is their any chance that irresponsible city officials will be prosecuted for heartless animal abuse?
3. Leland Cheung.
Cheung is working to make things worse and his destructiveness keys into further outrages by the Department of Conservation and Recreation which he does not want to know about. He calls for irresponsible development on DCR property attacking the Charles River White Geese, but when it comes to $20 million for destruction of hundreds of trees by the DCR, he claims it is none of his business.
None of his business? He voted for underpasses claimed to be part of the tree destruction. He is fighting for a bike highway in the ghetto to which the Charles River White Geese have been confined. He is fighting for a fence creating yet another wall in the wildlife area. His “neutrality” includes “neutrality” on the destruction of a magnificent tree looming over his highway proposal.
Cambridge, of course, conducts its own foreign policy, but Cheung runs away from irresponsible behavior in Cambridge a city in which it is very much is with his duty to care.
That, of course, includes his “neutrality” on a Cambridge City Manager who received a penal damages award of more than three times actual damages by the jury, “reprehensible” by the judge and “ample evidence . . . of outrageous misbehavior” by the appeals court panel. Monteiro v. Cambridge.
The poor dear, he could see nothing wrong with the Cambridge City Manager destroying a department head’s life in retaliation for her filing a civil rights / women’s rights complaint.
Judge, jury, and appeals court panel gave him the power to fire the Cambridge City Manager, possibly without pension, for this outrage, and he saw nothing wrong.
4. Summary.
Please do not miss our posts on YouTube:
a. http://youtu.be/_5AvCUULcXo. My analysis of Cheung’s record on civil rights in context with photos of environmental destruction. The photos at the Magazine Beach playing fields include Sullivan’s outrage. Links are provided in the YouTube information page to the court decisions and to the plans for destruction on Memorial Drive, which were provided to Cheung.
b. http://youtu.be/FgQ9ojVuMxM. My analysis of Cheung’s impending destruction on the Cambridge Common. Partial update: at minimum, his construction zone is in process.
The vileness of the Cambridge government must be isolated as much as possible in Cambridge. Their filth should not be extended to further areas
