1. Introduction.
2. The bad guys told them to do it.
a. The basic lie.
b. These vile individuals kept from harming the Charles River White Geese because they were so popular.
3. The reality of the bad guys told them to do it.
4. One achievement of the only entity to support heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese.
5. Enough for now.
6. PS: Never forget the Charles River Master Plan.
1. Introduction.
This is the second segment in the City of Cambridge’s latest outrage. Propaganda disguised as an art exhibit.
Key in the propaganda was a brief piece of nonsense which described their heartless animal abuse targeted at the Charles River White Geese as something other than heartless animal abuse.
I apologize for the brevity of the first segment of this series. At http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/city-of-cambridge-lies-about-its.html, it only ran 7 pages off line. It was a partial list of lies of omission, targeted at general issues.
2. The bad guys told them to do it.
The continuing victims.
a. The basic lie.
The normal lie about the reprehensible people who run around Cambridge lying that they are the good guys is for one liar to praise another liar, and the second guy praises the first guy. So both these truly reprehensible people must be terrific folks. Don’t they keep saying that their coconspirator is so great?
The heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese is justified in this outrageous propaganda piece as a response to “a few Cambridge residents complained.”
b. These vile individuals kept from harming the Charles River White Geese because they were so popular.
The Department of Conservation and Recreation, the destructive bedfellow of the City of Cambridge did not dare harm the Charles River White Geese because they were so popular.
They are loved. They have been the subject of many visits to the Charles River by suburbanites.
An excellent example of the level to which they have been loved was the occasional foray across the on ramp next to their forced foodless ghetto.
They are very responsible jaywalkers. They look both ways before crossing and do not cross until it is safe. Their problem is that they are geese. They meander. They did create back ups of happy drivers admiring them. No horns. Just admiration.
One of the heartless attacks on them has been to close the entrance by them to the on ramp. That is food. They are no allowed to have food.
c. These vile individuals attacked and attacked and attacked, constantly lying about the nature of the attacks.
(1) They would never stoop so low.
The key actions have been smoothed over with flat out lies
I recall when I realized what was up, and tried to convince people.
The response was they would never stoop so low.
(2) Promise to never do harm.
The Boston Globe did a section page 1 story on the heartless commencement of starvation attacking the Charles River White Geese, the beginning of the starvation wall.
Next to the photo of a massive earth mover overwhelming a tiny white goose was a direct quote of the standard lie of the key abuser: “No intention to harm” the Charles River White Geese.
He kept up that lie and kept up that lie and kept up that lie.
People assume we have a responsible government.
Flat out lying simply is not done. After all, do not a bunch of reprehensible people run around calling liars saints?
The destruction has uniformly come through lies, including lies of fake protective groups.
3. The reality of the bad guys told them to do it.
When the vile manager made the outrageous statement of complaint about the Charles River White Geese, Friends of the White Geese made a freedom of information act demand of the DCR.
It produced two documents.
One was a letter from the DCR asking the predecessor of the falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” for their input.
The other was the letter from this reprehensible entity.
That was it. Nothing else.
4. One achievement of the only entity to support heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese.
I will get into the record of the reprehensible Charles River “Conservancy” later. One “achievement” should be enough to place this vile excuse for heartless animal abuse into perspective.
The Charles River Conservancy is the prime lobbyist for the impending destruction of hundreds of trees just supported by the State House.
They ran around with a petition asking folks to agree to environmental destruction under the River Street Bridge, the Western Avenue Bridge and the Anderson (Harvard Square) Bridges, the next three after the BU Bridge.
When this fake conservancy got the initial bill for destruction in front of the legislature, they claimed the people supporting the irresponsible behavior under those bridges supported the destruction of those hundreds of trees incidental to the destruction under those three bridges.
This is in spite of the lack of mention of this destruction in the petitions.
The DCR called the destruction of hundreds of trees “incidental” to the irresponsible behavior under those three bridges. The tree destruction, in their announcement, was about ten times the funding as the irresponsible behavior under those bridges.
5. Enough for now.
The latest and incoming victims from the people bad mouthing the Charles River White Geese AT THE REQUEST OF THE DCR..
I am overwhelmed with the feeling of filth.
This is reality on the Charles River in Cambridge and Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
This is reality in the politics of Cambridge, MA, USA.
6. PS: Never forget the Charles River Master Plan.
Totally unmentioned in this piece of fraud by Cambridge on the public is the key policy of the DCR’s Charles River Master Plan — to kill off or drive away all animals residing in the Charles River Basin.
