1. Photos from April 19, 2015.
2. The Charles River and the Cambridge Common are both part of One Big Outrage.
3. And if you do not like it, look at what the Cambridge City Manager did to Malvina Monteiro with the blessing of silence by a City Council who somehow could see no reason to fire Robert Healy.
1. Photos from April 19, 2015.
Photos from my visit to the Charles River White Geese.
They are doing their best and preparing for nesting season in a formerly lush area almost all of whom’s ground vegetation has been ruthlessly destroyed by the bureaucrats and their agents, with Cambridge and the bureaucrats working to make things worse.
The bureaucrats got blessing by the State House last year for $20 million worth of destruction of hundreds of trees and of animal habitat in this part of the Charles River.
Much more to come, especially if the nine vile Cambridge City Councilors go forward with plans for a new highway in this area.
2. The Charles River and the Cambridge Common are both part of One Big Outrage.
The most recent report is posted at: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/charles-river-cambridge-common-outrage_17.html
I have gotten some nice emails of support and praise, and I thank you folks for your comments.
The vileness of the City of Cambridge is something that the fake groups run around lying about.
The fake groups do a non stop pitch that vile behavior is something to praise the City of Cambridge about.
I visited the 34 year resident gaggle of the Charles River White Geese on Sunday, April 19, 2015. They are being deliberately starved by Cambridge and its friends.
They have been confined in a ghetto that was lush with vegetation. The vegetation was destroyed by multiple actions all linkable to the vile bureaucrats in the state bureaucracy who lie that they are defending the environment of the Charles River.
The dirt in these photos was artificially created from excellent vegetation by multiple outrages which are part of the same vile pattern as the destruction of the Cambridge Common.
These artificially created outrages differ in no meaningful way from man destroying our world throughout our world, except that the Cambridge Pols lie that they are the good guys. And if you do not believe them, look at what they did to Malvina Monteiro, and look at what they are doing to the Charles River White Geese, with much, much worse to come if they have their way.
And their friends are yelling at the Olympics. The Olympics organizer are anti-environment. The Olympics organizers want to destroy the starvation wall which prevents access to grass where the Charles River White Geese have fed for most of the past 34 years, and they have poisoned that grass.
What do the fake groups say? They say do not look at the outrages. They are fighting for massive destruction through company union techniques:
a. Do not look at the horrors being planned AND ACCOMPLISHED by the City of Cambridge and its friends.
b. Look at the supposed beauty they are promising with the usual lies of omissions of the important destruction: expansion of the poisons, continuation of the starvation wall, destruction of the little guys parking lot, implementation of a highway which is part of the destruction of hundreds of excellent trees they are fighting for by telling responsible people not to look at so many outrages being fought for by the vile Cambridge and its friends.
The local fake group did put their plans to a public meeting, AND LOST, based on negative comment from the floor.
The public meeting was not pleased.
So the fake group implemented blatant corruption.
They closed the meeting and deferred the vote from that January 2014 meeting to the February 2014 meeting which they conducted on April 23, 2014. Then, in a meeting blatantly less publicized than the honest meeting they lost in, they went through an outrageous and blatantly false vote. That particularly fake vote forms the basis for continued lies that their continued attacks on the Charles River have any claim to be responsible behavior.
The propaganda show presented lies about the Charles River White Geese, and showed the fake group’s public support for the bureaucracy’s goal of killing off or driving away all animals who are resident on the Charles River basin.
The short of it? Just more sickos destroying the only world we have to live in while lying of their own sainthood.
3. And if you do not like it, look at what the Cambridge City Manager did to Malvina Monteiro with the blessing of silence by a City Council who somehow could see no reason to fire Robert Healy.
Too often, when independent outsiders look at the City of Cambridge, they have the sort of opinion expressed by jury, judge and appeals court panel in Monteiro v. Cambridge.
The court decisions are posted on this blog at:
Superior Court: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/judge-issues-decision-denying.html
Appeals Court Panel: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/appeals-court-decision-in-monteiro.html
The jury had one tool to express its well found contempt: multiple penal damages.
This was a case in which a department head, a black Cape Verdean woman, had the nerve to listen to the Cambridge pols and behave accordingly. She filed a civil rights / women’s rights complaint alleging she was being discriminated against by the City of Cambridge by being paid less than men would be paid.
Robert Healy, the middle of the three person City Manager regency, destroyed her life by firing her in retaliation.
The jury awarded her $1.1 million real damages, and $3.5 penal damages. The penal damages are intended to communicate contempt for the City of Cambridge’s vile behavior. They exceed the normal maximum percentage for such awards.
The trial judge spent a year writing her opinion. It can be summed up in one word: “reprehensible.”
The appeal courts panel refused to dignify Cambridge’s appeal with a formal opinion. The non formal formal opinion stated in relevant part: “ample evidence of . . . outrageous misbehavior.”
The Cambridge City Council saw nothing wrong with Healy’s behavior. Exactly ZERO members of the then City Council sought to implement three levels of court condemnation by giving Healy a firing for malfeasance in office.
Healy and the Cambridge City Council clearly showed how decent behavior is treated in Cambridge, MA, USA, if that decent behavior deviates from the non stop lies of holiness.
Destroying a woman’s life for filing a women’s right complaint is considered normal behavior by the fake groups and by the Cambridge pols.
