I. Fake group destroys more ground vegetation.
1. More Destruction.
2. Bragging.
3. Current victims.
4. Past Achievements of Robots, the Destroyed Nesting Area.
5. Pending destruction.
6. The outrage of January 2016 ‒ Videos.
7. Summary.
II. Comments.
1. Public.
2. Harvard.
A. General.
B. Quote.
C. Beautiful photo - label.
III. Achievements of the fake protectors.
IV. Censorship.
I. Fake group destroys more ground vegetation.
1. More Destruction, analysis.
We are reporting in parallel. One thread is spinning off on letters to the Cambridge City Council. The other thread tries to be up to date.
We have previously reported on the fake neighborhood association destroying ground vegetation at Magazine Beach. On December 2, they are at it again.
These “achievements” serve several purposes.
a. They distract people from the massive destruction that the fake group is fighting for on the Charles River, hundreds of trees destroyed already with more coming, dumping of poisons on the banks of the Charles River, walling off of the banks of the Charles River from the river to starve resident animals, etc. They then lie to well intentioned people that these environmental destroyers are anything but.
b. They give folks perhaps a false impression of the area they are “improving.” :Here is a photo of the area being subject to destruction of ground vegetation.
c. Objectively, this area was created to drain off poisons which have no business being dumped on the Charles River. Thus the “improvements” that these frauds lie about to folks is that the poison drainage system has value. Draining off poisons which should not be there should be resolved by stopping the poisons, but responsible behavior of this sort is rather unacceptable to the Cambridge Machine. So they will just brag of their “good deeds” and keep secret the vile part.
d. The most important achievement is that they are keeping in office incompetents who are not fit to manage the environment.
e. More in the spirit of the Cambridge Machine, there is a truly vile part. The poison drainage system has created a positive value in that free animals, including rabbits have made their homes here.
Ground vegetation being destroyed protects resident animals.
So the destruction of ground vegetation fits the mantra of this reprehensible organization. They are abusing free animals.
2. Bragging.
They have bragged of this blatantly sick mentality in their propaganda show in City Hall Annex, photo attached.
3. Current victims.
Here is a photo of some of their victims wandering the streets of Cambridge after the same frauds helped Cambridge and the Department of Conservation and Recreation destroy hundred of trees and related animal habitat on the banks of the Charles River between the BU and Longfellow Bridges.
4. Past Achievements of Robots, the Destroyed Nesting Area.
There are two stages of destruction in this photo, first the robots destroyed the ground vegetation, then Railroad workers with the very clear after the fact blessing of the DCR, dumped crushed stone to make it worse.
The next three photos below are looking into the area to the right. The fourth is at the Charles River. The final photo is taken from the on ramp to Memorial Drive. The first, third and fifth shots have the Grand Junction at the top of the hill.
The above photo is probably taken with back to the Grand Junction and to the right of the area below.
The structure at the top is the Grand Junction Bridge.
The stairwell in the foreground in the last photo was part of much illegally accomplished by Boston University who lied that they did not do this destruction and a lot of other destruction.
When Boston University was condemned by the Cambridge Conservation Commission, the bureaucrats blamed months of lies on their president’s secretary and started bragging. There is no knowledge of discipline of the secretary..
These areas were formerly heavily vegetated. The robots and bureaucrats have created dirt.
The reality is that you have bureaucrats who have contempt for the environment, and you have frauds propagating the incompetence of these reprehensible people as something to be proud of by walking around destroying things to help out the incompetents.
5. Pending destruction.
I have done many reports.
The detailed summary of the coming outrage at Magazine Beach which was presented to the Cambridge City Council and City Manager on June 6, 2017.
The official city record is at http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1815&Inline=True, pages 198 to 249.
This is a long download. I am pleased to provide 5 email sized PDF’s of it. Just contact me at boblat@yahoo.com.
It has been heavily supplemented.
6. The outrage of January 2016 ‒ Videos.
Memorial Drive Destruction, Final Cut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTplCCEJP7o.
Nature and Beauty Ripped out along the Charles River: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTplCCEJP7o.
7. Summary.
The result is the aggressive participation of these people in humanity’s destruction of our earth, made worse by the non stop fraud of claims of superiority.
II. Comments.
1. Public.
I see the idiots are going to be tearing up more roots Saturday. Guess the rabbits' habitat means nothing to them.
I also notice the cottonwoods did not fare well through the summer. They look less healthy to me than last year. There's a lot of blight and fungal infections around now that the winters are no longer cold enough to kill them.
2. Harvard.
A. General.
The following is quoted, citations omitted, from “Other Order: Sound Walk for an Urban Wild”, Peter Del Tredici and Teri Rueb, Arnoldia 75/1, August 2017, pp. 14 to 25. Arnoldia is a publication the Harvard University entity, the Arnold Arboretum, a large museum of nature in the southern part of Boston, MA which is maintained and displayed to the public as part of Harvard positive work in our world.. The display includes large areas displaying excellent vegetation such as the fake protectors are destroying on the Charles River.
The quotation attempts below attempts to communicate without being massive plagiarism.
The report includes some decidedly lovely photographs of the area in the Arnold Arboretum which the Cambridge destroyers lie is offensive. The report is on line at http://arnoldia.arboretum.harvard.edu/pdf/articles/2017-75-1-other-order-sound-walk-for-an-urban-wild.pdf.
B. Quote.
* * * *
In the United States, the idea that unmanaged “open space” in cities could perform valuable ecological services was foreshadowed by a movement . . . that categorized such sites as “urban wilds” . . .
* * * *
Boston Urban Wilds, a 1976 report from the Boston Redevelopment Authority, identified 143 land parcels in Boston with potential value as preserved natural areas.
* * *
In 1988, the Boston Parks Department officially took over management of the Urban Wilds program which, as of 2014, listed 39 properties in its inventory.
* * *
The original 1976 BRA report described 143 sites that contained some significant “natural resource value,” including geological features (68 sites), coastal or fresh water wetlands (20 sites), shorelines (27 sites), or important vegetation (28 sites). . . . In the 1970's, urban wilds, regardless of their biological content or cultural history, were viewed as valuable antidotes to blighted, barren cityscapes. . . . Reconceptualization of urban nature [by the late-1990's] ‒ essentailly attempting to affix a “native” label on it ‒ represented a dramatic reversal of fortune for the non-native organisms that found themselves reclassified as invasive species. Older, less value-driven terms to describe these plants . . . fell by the wayside and with them an appreciation of their historic connection with the past land use of the site.
In 1996, . . .Eugenie Beal and John Blackwell and . . .the Boston Natujral Areas Fund and the Arboretum Park Conservancy . . . achieved] permanent protection for the entire 25-acre site [of urban wilds, Bussey Brook Meadow].
. . . a dynamic organize ecological system that reflect[s] cultural values, past land-use history and future ecological trajectories . . .
* * *
C. Beautiful photo - label.
Non-native wetland plants growing in Bussey Brook Meadow: common reed (Phragmites australis) in the background, . . .
III. Achievements of the fake protectors.
Robots controlled by the Department of Conservation and Recreation have a very clear record.
Above are photos and videos of some their achievements: destroy, destroy, destroy, and lie.
That is what the DCR, the Cambridge Development Department and their Robots stand for and which they fight for with non stop propaganda, censorship and bullying.
IV. Censorship.
The fake group doing this destruction even had an extended discussion on their ListServ on whether the ListServ would be openly censored.
I communicated to the City Manager and City Council, among other things that this supposedly open “neighborhood association” practiced censorship on their ListServ as a means of lying that they represent a neighborhood rather than being cheerleaders for an irresponsible city government.
Not long after that, with great fanfare, the fake group loudly proclaimed an end to censorship.
The usual fraud.
Honest censorship has been replaced with expulsion from their list of those who have the nerve to talk reality on their list as opposed to supporting the repeated fraud coming from the string pullers.
But they do love to lie that they do not censor.
The terrible things these people are fighting for AND HAVE ACHIEVED will not stand the light of day, so censorship, bullying and multiple corrupt tactics combine with non stop hypocricial nonsense.
The censorship IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF CLAIMS OF OPENNESS and other outrageous tactics prove the bankruptcy of the cause for which they fight.
