Cambridge, MA, USA, City Council yells at the other guy on the environment, as usual. A VERY LIMITED response.
1. General.
2. Part of the Real Record of the Cambridge City Council.
A, Poisoning of the Charles River.
B. Results of the attack.
(1) Poisoning on the Ground.
(2) Poisoning in the Charles River.
C. City Council Rewards the Charles River Poisoner.
D. The City Council targeted MicroCenter Grove.
(1) Drone Photo.
(2) View from MicroCenter side.
(3) Cropped destruction plans in DCR plan submitted to Cambridge Conservation Commission, passed on to Cambridge City Council and ignored.
(4) Formerly SECRET after plans provided to Cambridge City Council by Charles River Poisoner, cropped accordingly.
3. Reality of victims REWARDED BY THE CAMBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL..
4. Proper Voter response.
A. Referendum.
B. City Council Reelection goals.
1. General.
On September 12 order 4, the Cambridge City Council stood up against “rodents.”
Looking up the definition on Google, I find a definition of rodents as “mice, rats, squirrels, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, and hamsters.” It is entirely within the character of the Cambridge City Council to stand up to mice (including pets), squirrels, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, and hamsters.
The Chronicle reported that the attack was on rats.
The ongoing environmental destruction under the aegis of the irresponsible funding and irresponsible zoning of the Cambridge City Council includes massive habitat destruction. Victims must go somewhere. The rat victims which concern the City Council, according to the Chronicle, are creating use of poisons with environmental destruction.
2. Part of the Real Record of the Cambridge City Council.
A, Poisoning of the Charles River.
Poison use on the banks of the Charles River dates back to management of the Magazine Beach playing fields by (subsequent City Manager) Richard Rossi representing the City of Cambridge. For more than a Century before then Magazine Beach was pristine.
Dead bees, supposedly subject to the concern of the Cambridge City Council have been seen in the playing fields.
The DCR is bragging that POISONS BEING DUMPED ON THE MAGAZINE BEACH PLAYING FIELDS which originated in Cambridge management is being neutralized by expensive drainage systems installed by Cambridge and the DCR.
Here is a cropped still from “From Cambridge to Boston with the DJ Inspire 1 Drone footage,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN-OmMzvHhw, minute 10.26, showing the part of the drainage which has since been attacked by a friend of the Cambridge City Council with DCR / Trump funds and DCR “volunteers.”
Here is a photo of the drainage after being blocked by the City Council’s friend:
B. Results of the attack.
Here are Phil Barber’s photos of algae creation next to the blockage and in the Charles River next to Magazine Beach:
(1) Poisoning on the Ground.
(2) Poisoning in the Charles River.
The City Council has since assisted in a DCR boondoggle to respond to the much larger and related subsequent poisoning downriver from the Mass. Ave. Bridge.
C. City Council Rewards the Charles River Poisoner.
A very visible Cambridge City Council’s response to the actual poisoning has been to PAY the CHARLES RIVER POISONER to assist in plans to destroy the excellent MicroCenter grove next to the DCR Swimming Pool.
The DCR in its show and tell to the Cambridge Conservation Commission said that it intended to destroy the MicroCenter grove to move a parking lot on top of the grove.
Here is a drone photo crop, minute 2.33, of the part of the parking lot assigned to the Charles River Poisoner.
She has been assigned to beautify the portion of the TO BE MOVED PARKING lot which is the grey area to the upper left of the white swimming pool. Beautifying the parking lot creates the DCR's "needed" move on top of the MicroCenter Grove.
D. The City Council targeted MicroCenter Grove.
(1) Drone Photo.
Minute 2.33
(2) View from MicroCenter side.
(3) Cropped destruction plans in DCR plan submitted to Cambridge Conservation Commission, passed on to Cambridge City Council and ignored.
(4) Formerly SECRET after plans provided to Cambridge City Council by Charles River Poisoner, cropped accordingly.
Area 3 is the tree destruction. The pool, as usual, is the white area. At the top is, at the right, MicroCenter, and, in the middle, the MicroCenter parking lot.
3. Reality of victims REWARDED BY THE CAMBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL..
Rather obvious. But they love to yell at the other guy. It gives the voter a fraudulent impression.
4. Proper Voter response.
The bad stuff is always unanimous and kept as secret as possible while yelling at the other guy.
A. Referendum.
The City Council wants its power increased by a referendum.
Nonsense. The voters should vote agains it.
B. City Council Reelection goals.
This is just a tiny part of the reality of the Cambridge City Council.
The voter should vote for every candidate on the City Council proportional representation ballot, putting ALL incumbents at the end.
The way this works, no city council incumbents could get “transfers” until after ALL NON INCUMBENTS NO LONGER HAVE USE FOR THE TRANSFERS, very clearly a NO vote against the unanimously environmentally destructive Cambridge City Council.
