1. Charles River White Geese Show Off Their Babies.
a. Babies.
b. Charles River White Ducks.
2. Links to latest reports of outrages.
3. Contacts: Protect against destruction.
4. Tip.
1. Charles River White Geese Show Off Their Babies.
Here are photos from Sunday, June 1.
a. Babies.
In the middle of the first photo are two tiny babies, probably in about their first or second week.
In the second photo, middle, left, is an adolescent. This guy has reached his adult colors.
I think I see the adolescent toward the left in the third photo. The other 2 are barely visible far up in the right.
The ground in these photos is an excellent example of the rottenness of the people we are dealing with.
One of the first things the falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” did when they started destroying the environment for the bureaucrats was destroy ground vegetation. They must have dumped poisons because it has never come back.
More recently, irresponsible railroad workers were egged on in irresponsible parking in the most sensitive area, with a ready place to park just a few hundred feet away. The Cambridge Conservation Commission spoke to the key bureaucrat. He told the workers to continue destroying, but to only destroy beyond the tiny jurisdiction of the Cambridge Conservation Commission. The area you see is beyond the CCC jurisdiction.
Even during the years of deliberately starving these beautiful animals, this key rotter repeatedly has denied intent to harm the Charles River White Geese.
But then, their sanctified “Charles River Master Plan” calls for killing or driving away as many resident animals as they can get away with.
b. Charles River White Ducks.
In 2006, these beauties were dumped at Magazine Beach at a very tiny age. They were so naive that the Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative had to show them what all that blue stuff is for.
During their first day, I saved them from a dog attack. They thought dogs were their friends.
They very quickly had babies, all of whom apparently died. They have never tried again, to my knowledge.
I have periodically gotten concerned about them, seeing only one of the two with their Mallard friend who seems to have become inseparable. The other White Duck has always come back. One possible explanation could be nesting.
2. Links to latest reports of outrages.
The plans for destruction under House Bill H4009 are at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/tree-destruction-plans-charles-river.html.
These are the official plans posted when they sought Obama moneys, lying of disease to the public. They have been fighting to destroy these trees for 10 years. Do not be conned. Any deviation from these plans will be minor.
The exact citation is House Bill H4009 is Section 2C, line item 2890-7020.
The photos of trees marked for destruction on the Cambridge Common are posted in two parts:
a. http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-cambridge-common-another-target-of.html.
b. http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/cambridge-ma-usa-prepares-to-destroy.html.
My letter of objection to the Cambridge City Council is posted at:
http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/destruction-of-cambridge-common-3.html. The letter includes smaller reproductions of the actual photos.
The Cambridge City Clerk's Printing of my letter and the attachments far surpasses in quality my records. It is posted at: http://www2.cambridgema.gov/CityOfCambridge_Content/documents/140602%20latremouille%20com_1.PDF.
3. Contacts: Protect against destruction.
I have repeatedly reported on the outrages being inflicted on the Charles River and the Cambridge Common.
I included in the letter to the Cambridge City Council objecting to its imminent outrages on the Cambridge Common my objections to House Bill H4009 initiated by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation. This will destroy hundreds of trees between the BU Bridge and the Longfellow Bridge, and ALL such destruction is coordinated with the City of Cambridge. Passage could be imminent.
I summarized many other ongoing and recently accomplished environmental outrages for the City Council of the City of Cambridge has filthy hands.
The imminent target of destruction is the excellent common just north of Harvard Square in Cambridge, MA, USA.
The outrages on the Cambridge Common are included in my post on YouTube at http://youtu.be/FgQ9ojVuMxM.
If you would like to be recorded opposing to these outrages, please send an email to dlopez@cambridgema.gov. That will get your email to Donna Lopez, the City Clerk. As part of your email, ask that your email be forwarded to the Cambridge City Council and included in their Communications for the next meeting.
Support of my letter opposing the destruction on the Cambridge Common and the destruction in H4009 concerning multiple destruction of trees and animals on the Charles River would be helpful.
Of greater value in opposing the outrages on the Charles River would be communications to state officials as follows:
Massachusetts Governor’s Office email form: http://www.mass.gov/governor/constituentservices/contact/.
All Massachusetts Legislators’ emails: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/emails-for-all-massachusetts.html.
The list of legislators’ emails is set up so that you can copy and paste them into addresses on your email, either original addressees or, better, blind copies. Please do not miss the addendum at the beginning in which I list the local State Representative who was recently elected.
4. Tip.
The key with the Cambridge City Council is that their weakness is a very distressing and continued lie that they are pro-environment.
It is a very major weakness.
There are four out of nine newcomers. One might be subject to persuasion. The balance could be possibly be embarrassed into decency. I have major zoning victories as an environmental technique in Cambridge. It was common to get approvals from the “conservatives.” The “liberals” were then embarrassed into compliance with their claimed positions.
Of major importance with legislators is a widespread contempt for the Department of Conservation and Recreation and its destructiveness. Cambridge, MA, is a distinctive entity which is in sync with the problems that the DCR embodies.
