1. Starvation Wall.
a. Plans.
b. Past experience.
c. Flat out lies to achieve.
2. Other impacts on the Magazine Beach playing fields by Cambridge / accomplices, possible results.
a. Introduction of invasive vegetation by Cambridge, etc.
b. Destruction of playing fields.
c. Will the bleachers need room taken up by the drainage system?
d. Fake group activities.
3. What other destruction?
a. Hostile to animals.
b. Company union fight for all destructive activities of Cambridge and its friends.
4. Lies, lies, lies. This has to be Cambridge and its friends.
5. So what other lies are the Cambridge City Council / friends coming up with to yell at people who are not as vile as Cambridge and its friends?
1. Starvation Wall.
a. Plans.
The one thing which is clear about the Olympics planning on the Charles River is that they want to destroy the starvation wall.
Before:
After:
b. Past experience.
The one event in the past which compares to the Olympics was the Charles River Regatta.
The Charles River Regatta took over the Magazine Beach playing fields for a weekend each year. It disrupted the Charles River White Geese in that they, for the weekend, could not get to their food and their resting place at the Magazine Beach playing fields, where they lived and were a loved tourist attraction most of the year for most of the last 34 years. But they did often sleep in the Charles River off the playing fields.
There was no harm whatsoever to their back up residence east of the BU Bridge, where they are now confined without food.
Definitely better than Cambridge and its vile friends.
c. Flat out lies to achieve.
The Cambridge City Council has claimed lack of openness by the Olympics.
This bizarre claim is the typical rottenness of the Cambridge City Council.
There were three flat out lies, at minimum, in Cambridge/friends’ construction of that starvation wall.
(1) A lawn to the river.
That was the promise in the vile bureaucrats “Charles River Master Plan.”
So they modified the Master Plan after the destructive wall was built to turn a lie into a former lie.
(2) Repeated promises over many years to do “no harm.”
This came from the horribly lying key manager.
He repeatedly promised to do no harm to the Charles River White Geese.
When Cambridge / its friends started the starvation, the Boston Globe led one of its Sunday sections with a photo of a tiny white goose overwhelmed by a construction machine. To the right of the massive photo was a quote from this massive liar, promising to do no harm.
Here is a photo of friends of the Charles River White Geese feeding them over the wall that these vile people put up.
(3) Cheerleader activity.
The falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” conducted a swim in to celebrate the starvation attack.
All action, no matter how vile, is claimed to improve swimming.
This vile organization has yet to explain how walling off the Charles River from the playing fields aids swimming from the playing fields.
But then, when caught in lies, these vile groups just resume other lies or whatever else will work.
2. Other impacts on the Magazine Beach playing fields by Cambridge / accomplices, possible results.
a. Introduction of invasive vegetation by Cambridge, etc.
The Olympics organizers plan to put in temporary stands.
The temporary stands could be impacted by another part of the vileness of Cambridge and its friends.
Cambridge and its friends destroyed healthy grass on which the Charles River White Geese fed for most of the last 34 years and replaced it with sickly stuff which requires poisons to survive.
Introduced vegetation which requires poisons to survive is clearly destructive to the environment. The only reasonable definition is that INVASIVE VEGETATION was introduced as part of the sick destruction on the Magazine Beach playing fields.
b. Destruction of playing fields.
To keep the bizarre poisons out of the Charles River, Cambridge, etc. created an expensive drainage system.
That expensive drainage system replaced playing fields. One of the key lies in the outrage was “improvement” of playing fields.
c. Will the bleachers need room taken up by the drainage system?
I certainly hope so. That would require stopping the poisons to keep alive the sickly invasive introduced grass. The responsible thing to do would be to seed the responsible grasses destroyed by Cambridge, etc. You know, the stuff that did not require poisons.
d. Fake group activities.
The fake group fighting for destruction of the Charles put their outrages up to a public meeting in January 2014. They want to expand the invasive grasses and poisons to the top of the hill to the west of the playing fields and to the wetland west of that behind the swimming pool.
They want to destroy the little guys’ parking lot at the top of the hill, and at the end of Magazine Beach.
They also want a new highway which is related to the massive tree destruction.
And keep the outrages in place on the playing fields.
They did good publicity and got a good attendance. The good attendance were normal human beings, hostile to the vile plans.
So the fake group deferred the vote until their February meeting which they conducted on April 23, this time with no publicity.
They deferred discussion of this topic, which took the entire January meeting, to the last ten minutes. At that time, they introduced a horribly complicated motion and ordered that it be fully discussed in ten minutes. And then voted on by folks who could care less.
They since replaced monthly meeting with bi-monthly meetings cancelled in the summer and cancelled twice since then. They have severely abused the agenda to prevent meaningful discussion of the Charles River by splitting announcements. Most announcements go at the beginning. Charles River goes at the last ten minutes, and reality is censored by lack of time. They have also introduced exercises in the middle of the meeting which helps reduce the time available for reality which, in reality, is censored by “lack of time”.
The only time they conducted this announcement in the middle of the meeting, they simply shouted down responsible discussion.
And the Cambridge City Council piously yells at the Olympics folks.
This kind of corruption is normal from the fake groups in the City of Cambridge.
And two of the worst destroyers in the fake group are being presented by Cambridge/its friends as defenders of the Charles River.
3. What other destruction?
a. Hostile to animals.
Well, of course, they now brag about hostility to the animals of our world.
This replaces more than a decade of lies of “no intent” to harm.
A sign from their propaganda piece in the second most important Cambridge public building.
b. Company union fight for all destructive activities of Cambridge and its friends.
The fake group lives by the company union tactic of lying of concern and then telling folks to ignore everything of value.
They are thus fighting for all vileness on the Charles River being sought by Cambridge and its friends.
That includes the destruction of hundreds of trees between the BU and Longfellow Bridges supported by the State House in the amount of $20 million last year.
Chapter 286 of the acts of 2014, “historical parkways”
Among other things, the Cambridge City Council, while lying of no involvement in the Charles, has destruction proposed for the Charles and its animals through new construction and construction of a fence splitting the animal area in two
And their friends have been busy on the Boston side seeking to extend their construction to that side of the river as part of the Mass. Pike (I90) reconstruction.
The Massachusetts Department of Transportation is not perfect, but this is another example of it standing up to Cambridge outrages.
So the Cambridge City Council authorized negotiations with Boston to work around this responsible bureaucracy.
4. Lies, lies, lies. This has to be Cambridge and its friends.
Two of the most visible of the destroyers are now being presented as defenders of the Charles River by Cambridge and its frieds.
5. So what other lies are the Cambridge City Council / friends coming up with to yell at people who are not as vile as Cambridge and its friends?
Stay tuned. They are very innovative.
