I. Letter to the Cambridge City Council.
II. Analysis of letter to Cambridge City Council.
I. Letter to the Cambridge City Council.
RE: Charles River: A concise recent history of the three manager Cambridge City Manager Machine.
1. Introduction.
2. Robert Healy, Malvina Monteiro, Robots, the three manager Cambridge City Manager Machine, and Sutherland Springs.
3. Destruction at Alewife.
4. Destruction on the Charles River, January 2016, and preceding.
5. Destruction on the Cambridge Common.
6. Magazine Beach, Coming.
7. My Record, Very Abbreviated, on the Strange Treatment of Robert Healy.
1. Introduction.
In my last communication, I proposed to provide you detail as to what is being gained by the fake neighborhood association which is fighting for massive destruction on the Charles River by whatever dirty trick works, among other things by belligerent censorship when individuals have the nerve to talk reality.
[featured box on first page, a photo, double click for full view]
[featured box occupies 30% of first page at bottom left, , double click for full view]]
In my last communication, I proposed to provide you detail as to what is being gained by the fake neighborhood association which is fighting for massive destruction on the Charles River by whatever dirty trick works, among other things by belligerent censorship when individuals have the nerve to talk reality.
It has turned out that my communications work better by starting with this concise recent history of the three manager City Manager Machine, and afterward going into more exact detail on the Company Unions, the Robots and some experiences with them drawn out by personal attacks by the destroyers.
2. Robert Healy, Malvina Monteiro, Robots, the three manager Cambridge City Manager Machine, and Sutherland Springs.
The Cambridge City Council named its police station after retired City Manager Robert Healey.
Robert Healy was found by three levels of court to have destroyed the life of Malvina Monteiro in retaliation for her working for women’s rights.
The trial judge, in her extensive and well grounded opinion, found Healy’s actions to be “reprehensible.” Opinion posted at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/judge-issues-decision-denying.html. Her analysis quoted Healey’s testimony extensively.
The Appeals Court panel refused to dignify Cambridge’s appeal with a formal opinion. So it wrote an opinion which it explicitly called not an opinion. Key in the non opinion opinion was the statement “ample evidence of . . . outrageous misbehavior. . .” The analysis is posted at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/appeals-court-decision-in-monteiro.html.
The jury had such great contempt for Healy’s behavior that the jury awarded the plaintiff slightly over a million dollars real damages and more than three times that in penal damages. Penal damages communicate contempt for irresponsible behavior. More than triple damages is highly unusual communication of contempt.
And the Cambridge City Council named the Police Station after Robert Healy.
Cambridge has very loud and visible women’s rights activists. I am aware of exactly ZERO who have publicly communicated problems with Healy’s destruction of the life of Malvina Monteiro for fighting for women’s rights. ALL the “women’s rights activists” loudly proclaim that they are protecting women’s rights. None of them have public problems with Robert Healy’s name being on the Cambridge Police Station. A lot of them yell at malfeasants elsewhere in the world, especially Republicans.
I have a friend who has spent much of her life fighting for causes which she is told are politically correct. When I mention Monteiro to her, I get a response which certainly sounds dictated to her by the powers that be.
She has no problem with Healy destroying the life of Malvina Monteiro because of the very large payments received by Monteiro as a result of the trial. A lot of women’s rights activists in Cambridge have problems with Republicans paying off women for outrages much less harmful than destroying their lives in retaliation for women’s rights activism.
My friend’s communication definitely sounds like the truly outrageous forms of “truth” which are splattered about Cambridge under the aegis of the three manager Cambridge Manager Machine. There is no way a normal human being would spout such nonsense without a highly toxic environment. Reality and decency are tossed on their heads in the City of Cambridge.
People who think they are defending proper causes are turned into Robots spouting nonsense, if you understand what they are saying and if you are not surrounded by a truly vile machine which controls so much of Cambridge politics. The nonsense too often tends to be exactly the opposite of what the victims think they are standing for.
In its analysis of the Sutherland Spring murders, Time, in its November 20, 2017 issue, reports a record of animal abuse by the killer. Time, as is stated time and time and time again outside the City of Cambridge, stated that animal abusers too often mass killers are animal abusers. There are, of course, less extreme levels of outrageous behavior, such as the bureaucratic destruction of Malvina Monteiro’s life, or, perhaps the situations in the seven similar cases mentioned in the City Solicitor’s letter of June 12, 2012 to the Cambridge City Council.
[BOTTOM LEFT OF SECOND PAGE]
3. Destruction at Alewife.
Overlapping the time of the Healy - Monteiro battle, Healy’s government was planning / involved in the heartless abuse of animals at Alewife. Following is a photo of the achievement of Healy and Cambridge at Alewife.
The City of Cambridge, with the state’s Department of Conservation and Recreation destroyed 3.4 acres or more of virgin woodlands at Alewife, indifferent to the resident animals, of necessity, being heartlessly abused, except to loudly proclaim that they were “allowing” some of their victims to “move” somewhere.
The actual project was directly managed by the successor to Robert Healy as City Manager, Richard Rossi.
But the City Council, on multiple occasions, yelled at developers obeying zoning controlled by the Cambridge City Council in other parts of this same virgin woodlands. The City Council, in its indignant communications, never mentioned that the City Council controlled the zoning that the City Council was yelling at developers for obeying.
The trees in the outskirts of this picture formerly occupied the entire area of the photo, a forest virgin for more than a century.
4. Destruction on the Charles River, January 2016, and preceding.
About the time that Healy was destroying the life of Malvina Monteiro because she was working for Women’s Rights, Healy’s government was involved in the heartless abuse of animals on the Charles River including, BUT VERY MUCH NOT LIMITED TO the Charles River White Geese. The 36 year resident gaggle is the most visible, but is not, by any means, the only animals being abused. The outrages dates back to a 1997 Cambridge plan. Rossi managed the 2000's outrage, including the Starvation Wall and the introduction of poisons into a location which had been responsibly managed.
Here are photos of the January 2016 outrage.
Here is a photo of free animals whose habitats have been heartlessly and bizarrely destroyed, wandering about the streets of Cambridge in the middle of the Winter, looking for food after the destruction of hundreds of trees and animal habitat between the BU Bridge and Longfellow Bridge in January 2016.
No such animals, that I know of, were wandering the streets of Cambridge before the destruction on the Charles.
Cambridge has a destructive subculture lying about which side it is on, and giving people they impression that they are”protecting.”
The destroyers tell well meaning people not to look at the outrages the destroyers are fighting for. They constantly tell folks just to look at the lovely things they tell folks to look at.
Here is a photo in the act of a contractor of the DCR, with Cambridge support, destroying the magnificent cherry grove at the Memorial Drive split.
At the time of the destruction, the members of the City Council had been receiving regular email updates for months. During the destruction, the updates increased to three or more per week.
The Cambridge City Council “took action.” DURING THE DESTRUCTION, the Cambridge City Council yelled at circuses passing through Cambridge on the public highway for animal abuse. The Cambridge City Council was deafeningly silent about the SIMULTANEOUS outrage of the DCR and Cambridge on the Charles River.
My videos on the Charles River outrage are posted at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTplCCEJP7o (detailed before and after analysis, including analysis at Magazine Beach), and at https://youtu.be/dWyCdcWMuAA (analysis of the “improvements” by an international expert).
Here are a few before and after pictures west of Mass. Ave. The following page is destruction in process east of Mass. Ave. Many more photos are in the videos, including some analysis of coming outrages on the Charles. Our prior reports went into detail on attacks targeted at the 36 year resident Charles River White Geese.
* * * *
A group of Cambridge Machine Robots, in coordination with the City of Cambridge, bragged about animal abuse in a propaganda show fighting for massive destruction on the Charles River in the City Hall Annex. Part of the bragging is above.
The same folks practice their fight in censorship, agenda abuse, personal attacks, bullying, fraudulent claims of “dead or dying,” and other corrupt tactics that work.
I have even had an apparently standard sales pitch tossed at me claiming nothing to do with the destruction. Then when that did not work, without a blink, I got handed the “dead or dying” fraud from this person who claimed to have nothing to do with the destruction. It is possible that one of our information sheets was pulled down by a business based on the “nothing to do with” part of this nonsense.
The standard non stop mantra, supported by all sorts of nonsense:
LOOK AT WHAT WE TELL YOU TO LOOK AT! DON’T LOOK AT WHAT WE ARE DESTROYING!
5. Destruction on the Cambridge Common.
The Harvard Square end of the Cambridge Common, before.
The Harvard Square end of the Cambridge Common, after
6. Magazine Beach, Coming.
Some of many communications.
My 51 page report of June 6, 2017, http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1815&Inline=True, pages 198 to 249.
First Destruction on Magazine Beach, http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=15&ID=1727&Inline=True, pages 182 and following.
Destruction at MicroCenter and related, http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1825&Inline=True, page 151 to 157.
Inner belt relived, http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1825&Inline=True, pages 176 to 192.
Analysis of three City Manager Reports, http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1846&Inline=True, pages 153 to 158.
October 12, 2017 letter, http://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1853&Inline=True, pages 108 to 116.
7. My Record, Very Abbreviated, on the VERY TELLING Treatment of Robert Healy.
Video, “The City Manager Can Be Fired,” posted on YouTube August 24, 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeGQtlFSg7k.
Sincerely,
Robert J. La Trémouille
II. Analysis of letter to Cambridge City Council.
Normally this blog report is translated to two other media by condensation, Facebook and an email report mostly to residents of the City of Cambridge. This time the normally condensed versions have become an analysis of the Blog report.
Following is the condensed explanation of the letter in Section II. The referenced attachments are not provided a second time. They are all above.
* * * * *
I have been busy. This communication to the Cambridge City Council was mailed on November 20, 2017 to the Cambridge City Manager and to the City Clerk for the Cambridge City Council who received it at their November 27, 2017 meeting.
The very terrible situation on the Charles River is the result of the convergence of two very terrible government agencies. One, the City of Cambridge by the Cambridge City Council, does a lot of lying about itself because it has an electorate which demands a responsible city government and which is told this government with its terrible record is the embodiment of sainthood. The other is a state government entity whose lack of fitness for its job dates back to “planners” who were one stated reason why a prior government entity was destroyed by the legislature. Respectively the “planners” previously controlled the now destroyed Metropolitan District Commission. They moved to the Department of Conservation and Recreation with their terrible plans.
The DCR, with the support of the City of Cambridge has partially and very terribly implemented its plans east of the BU Bridge on the Cambridge side of the Charles River. Now they, with the EXPLICIT support of the Cambridge City Council are fighting for further destruction at Magazine Beach and in other plans shared with the City of Cambridge on the Charles River. The Cambridge City Council FULLY CONTROLS THE DCR because the Cambridge City Council has the right to seek removal of this clearly unfit agency by petitioning the Massachusetts legislature.
The problem in Cambridge really stems from City Manager control of pretty much all supposed protective groups in the city and at least one very major group outside the city. This control dates back to James Leo Sullivan’s return to the office in 1974. The control of “protective” organizations accumulated through his successors, Robert Healy and Richard Rossi. Through the fake organizations, the City Manager Machine has controlled the voters of the city by a long pattern of lies about the Cambridge City Council, a pattern which really has given the City Manager control of the City Council through the fake groups and their lies.
Control varies. Control of appointees approaches totality. Control of the fake groups is not as strong because, while the string pullers in the groups certainly look controlled, it is possible to get normal people into the fake groups and exert control over the fake groups in spite of the wishes of the string pullers.
I promised and have been working on a record of my environmental activities. I have had more victories than losses using zoning initiatives as an environmental tool. I have reversed the City Manager control of fake groups in the process.
The November 20, 2017, communication to the Cambridge City Council summarizes recent destruction in the very terrible record of the City of Cambridge on the Charles River and elsewhere. But the letter also reflects reality because outside forces are not as well controlled by the City of Cambridge, even though the groups influenced by the City of Cambridge commonly communicate a reality which is strikingly different from the reality in the world.
The weakness of the Cambridge City Manager Machine is the lies upon which it is based. This weakness may or may not be corrected by the current City Manager, Louis A. DePasquale. DePasquale has shown a willingness to behave responsibly. The trouble now is that the Machine created by his predecessors, while small in numbers, exerts massive political influence through the fake groups. The Cambridge Machine has repeatedly elected City Councils controlled by it / the City Manager by lying about supposed saintliness of the record of the City Council.
My November 20, 2017 letter placed on record selective recent City Council actions designed to belie the lies upon which the Cambridge City Council keeps getting elected.
The situation in Cambridge is so bizarre in the totalitarian control of supposed protective organizers so much so that Cambridge even controls its women’s right activists. And that is getting very strong.
This letter goes into the accomplished and planned destruction on the Charles River, the destruction at Alewife, and the destruction on the Cambridge Common.
But more than that it gets into the destruction of a woman’s life because, while an employee of the City of Cambridge, she had the nerve to fight for women’s rights for female employees of the City of Cambridge. The destruction of the life of Malvina Monteiro went into the area where the City Managers had made themselves dominant, the appointees.
So Cambridge, with funding by the Cambridge City Council attacked women’s rights by appealing a sound court condemnation of Robert Healy beyond common sense.
The Cambridge City Council proved their own lack of honor by naming the Cambridge Police Station after this City Manager who had been condemned by three levels of court for destroying the life of Malvina Monteiro in retaliation for her working for women’s rights.
In my opinion, Monteiro’s life was destroyed because she stood up to the totalitarian control of politics in the City of Cambridge by the City Manager Machine. The Women’s Movement in Cambridge is very loud and very strong, and very much silent about the name on the Cambridge Police Station. There is a very significant presence of women possibly more concerned about Lesbian rights that about the rights of women in general. That bias could be an alternate PARTIAL explanation for the deafening silence about the name on the Police Station.
At the same time as Healy and the Cambridge City Council fought for the City Manager’s right of totalitarian control of politics, the City Manager Machine was indulged in heartless destruction of the environment in the City of Cambridge including heartless animal abuse.
The letter is quoted in its entirety, with one typo corrected and adaptation to the difference medium of communication, on the Blog at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2017/12/charles-river-concise-recent-history-of.html.
Attached to this report are three summary tables of the situation included in the Blog report. One summarizes Monteiro. The second quotes Time magazine’s analysis of a mass killer noting there were red flags in his history, including a history of animal abuse, a striking parallel to Monteiro, the totalitarian control of politics supported by the destruction of Monteiro, and the continuing attacks on animals.
The third attachment is a photo of a table included in a propaganda show in the Cambridge City Hall Annex. The fake group fighting for destruction on the Charles River, in City Hall Annex, bragged about the right of the City of Cambridge and its fake groups to implement heartless animal abuse. The presence of that outrage in City property, in which the bureaucrats exert massive control, says way too much about the situation in the City of Cambridge.
The particular fake group with the propaganda show on city property throws people off its ListServ if they make comments reflecting reality, or even propose to do so. The censorship is opposed to the nonstop cheerleading which is all it allows on its ListServ while claiming to be a “neighborhood association,” and other lovely sounding names controlled by the same string pullers.
In my opinion, the Cambridge City Council is based on a House of Cards. The nonstop lies of politically correct saintliness are clearly proven as lies that by the record of the City of Cambridge and its City Council. As is the corrupt tactics used to protect that record of lies.
The Cambridge City Council is now fighting for further destruction on the Charles River ON MULTIPLE FRONTS, and it presides over a City Police Station named after a person roundly condemned by three levels of court for destroying a woman’s life because she fought for women’s rights.
Cambridge has a new City Council coming in. Will the new City Council change the Cambridge City Council to the politically correct saintliness the predecessor City Councils have lied that the City Council possesses?
The current Cambridge City Manager has stood up to the record of his three predecessors. The Cambridge City Manager has shown he will behave responsibly if the City Council will allow him to do so. What will the new City Council do?
The future of the Charles River and other major matters depends on the new Cambridge City Council’s interest in truly resembling the saintliness which its electorate demands that the Cambridge City Council possess. A political house built on lies is a House of Cards.
All the attachments can be greatly increased in size by double clicking.
