Cher reports that Sunday, she saw both Gus and Gina, the swan couple who have been her long time swan friends, together.
She had been concerned that the protection she had left for them had been destroyed and neither the couple nor their two offspring were there to be seen. These swans had lived for quite some time on a tributary flowing into Boston Harbor at a location near the Chelsea - Revere, MA line.
Destruction of protection for free animals is highly common on property belonging to the Department of Conservation and Recreation. They lived on DCR property. DCR property is where their protection was destroyed.
The DCR manager at Magazine Beach on the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, USA has publicly bragged that he is starving the Charles River White Geese through the bizarre wall Cambridge and the DCR have built and permitted to grow between the Magazine Beach playing fields and the Charles River. The DCR manager has repeatedly lied that he is not “harming” the Charles River White Geese and has no intention to “harm” them. The lie comes in his bizarre, and secret, definition of “harm.” The fine print of the DCR plans call for no animals to reside on the Charles River Basin. Their actions routinely harm resident animals “incidental” to whatever there are doing. The Cambridge Machine, as part of their non stop lies on environmental issues, praises the alleged environmental sainthood of the DCR pretty much as often as they praise the environmental sainthood of the unanimous environmental destroyers on the Cambridge City Council.
Cher has been a strong supporter of the Charles River White Geese but has not been getting around as much as she would like in recent weeks.
Cher saw Gus by himself a few days ago. Seeing Gina with Gus was a great relief although both look bedraggled. They were by a public sidewalk.
The current location of their offspring is unknown, but it certainly is possible that the offspring left for better weather elsewhere.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Sunday, February 17, 2013
“Fair Play” Cambridge, MA, USA Style
A gentleman by the name of Paul Steven Stone has been communicating extensively about the “plans” being bandied about by what passes for planning discussion in Cambridge, MA, USA. He is distressed at the nonsense concerning Central Square in Cambridge.
The Cambridge Chronicle published an extended analysis by him on the oped page in the February 14, 2013 hard copy, page A11.
The editor included editorial multiple responses correcting the writer’s comments.
What is striking about this is that the immediately preceding week, the Cambridge Chronicle published a blatantly misleading report in that same location by a woman who for 15 years has been fighting for destruction of the Alewife reservation in Cambridge. She has been using a fake group which she created which claims to be friends of Alewife.
The game, as is normal with Cambridge Machine operations, is to tell people to look at everything except what counts. This is called a company union. This woman has spent 14 or 15 years fighting for the totally avoidable and irresponsible destruction in the public ownership majority of the irreplaceable Alewife woodlands by telling people to look at longshot fights against private owners and not look at the totally avoidable and completely irresponsible public destruction.
The one time she has deviated from this fraudulent behavior was in a letter to the editor in which she bragged about the public destruction which was accomplished in October - November 2011.
The Cambridge Chronicle has devoted the first page of its second section at least twice to beautiful photos of this fraudulent group “fighting” for the long shot and telling people not to look at the winnable fight against her political friends.
I have provided the Cambridge Chronicle with photos of the destruction this fake group has succeeded in obtaining and the photos have been ignored.
The bizarreness is that by fighting the longshot fights and telling people not to fight for the really achievable goals of preventing totally irresponsible destruction by Cambridge and the DCR, this organization is really fighting for total destruction.
So yet again, last week, the Cambridge Chronicle published another fraudulent claim by this woman of “defending” Alewife by fighting the long shot fight. The Chronicle did not include any editorial comments about her long standing fraud.
But with regard to Paul Steven Stone’s comments, the Chronicle has included correction after correction after correction to his comments.
What does that say about the Cambridge Chronicle?
The Cambridge Chronicle published an extended analysis by him on the oped page in the February 14, 2013 hard copy, page A11.
The editor included editorial multiple responses correcting the writer’s comments.
What is striking about this is that the immediately preceding week, the Cambridge Chronicle published a blatantly misleading report in that same location by a woman who for 15 years has been fighting for destruction of the Alewife reservation in Cambridge. She has been using a fake group which she created which claims to be friends of Alewife.
The game, as is normal with Cambridge Machine operations, is to tell people to look at everything except what counts. This is called a company union. This woman has spent 14 or 15 years fighting for the totally avoidable and irresponsible destruction in the public ownership majority of the irreplaceable Alewife woodlands by telling people to look at longshot fights against private owners and not look at the totally avoidable and completely irresponsible public destruction.
The one time she has deviated from this fraudulent behavior was in a letter to the editor in which she bragged about the public destruction which was accomplished in October - November 2011.
The Cambridge Chronicle has devoted the first page of its second section at least twice to beautiful photos of this fraudulent group “fighting” for the long shot and telling people not to look at the winnable fight against her political friends.
I have provided the Cambridge Chronicle with photos of the destruction this fake group has succeeded in obtaining and the photos have been ignored.
The bizarreness is that by fighting the longshot fights and telling people not to fight for the really achievable goals of preventing totally irresponsible destruction by Cambridge and the DCR, this organization is really fighting for total destruction.
So yet again, last week, the Cambridge Chronicle published another fraudulent claim by this woman of “defending” Alewife by fighting the long shot fight. The Chronicle did not include any editorial comments about her long standing fraud.
But with regard to Paul Steven Stone’s comments, the Chronicle has included correction after correction after correction to his comments.
What does that say about the Cambridge Chronicle?
Friday, February 15, 2013
Cambridge, MA, USA “Town - Gown” Reports: Harvard, MIT, Leslie College, Cambridge College
In December, four Cambridge, MA, USA, educational institutions submitted reports to Cambridge on their development plans and recent creations.
The formal presentations to the Cambridge Planning Board came earlier this month. I have downloaded the reports to my computer and would be pleased to pass them on to anybody who might be interested. Please just give me a ring at boblat@yahoo.com. I have done very little work on the reports.
Physically, the reports range in size from Harvard University’s, at 6 megs to Cambridge College’s at 480 KB. In between are the Massachusetts Institute of Technology at about 4 megs and Leslie University at a little over 1 meg.
The reports are solely Cambridge. A few months ago, this blog presented several reports on Harvard’s expansion plans in Allston. These reports were based in part on the Boston correlative of these reports. Allston is briefly mentioned on page 35 of Harvard’s Cambridge report.
On page 31 of its report, Harvard announces a change in one of my biggest victories, the Inn at Harvard, located at the eastern end of Harvard Square proper. Harvard wanted this building to be built 72% larger and built to the lot line. The Cambridge City Council voted into place a zoning change implementing an initiative drafted by me which brought about the current building. The vote was 7 for, 1 opposed, 1 in the hospital. Harvard announces that it will take this property out of hotel use and use it for student housing.
The Leslie report, at page 20, also brings back very happy memories. The map shows the first three blocks north of Harvard Law School containing what Leslie calls its “Doble Campus”. The southern two thirds of these blocks were the target of my first, and first successful, downzoning initiative.
It is decidedly flabbergasting to view the middle of these three blocks, between Mellen and Wendell Streets. This block is now overwhelmingly owned by Leslie. When we worked on that zoning, the blocks were pretty decrepit and mostly not part of part of Leslie. The block with all that Leslie property saw significant zoning changes to keep the neighborhood nature of the area.
As part of an acting gig a few weeks ago, I was in Harvard’s new law building on the corner of Everett Street and Massachusetts Avenue, across the street from the subject of that downzoning, and affected by it.
I am confused as to the maximum I can send through Yahoo Mail. I should think the MIT report is sendable. I hope the Harvard report is sendable. If it is not, I will provide the URL.
Please let me know if I can be of service.
Thank you.
Addendum:
Awkward language above on the Inn at Harvard zoning change. The petition concerned the East Harvard Square area. The petitioners accepted, with my strong approval, a compromise proposed by Councilor Walsh.
After typical bullying by the Cambridge Machine, including a key flat out lie, and over my strong objections, the petitioners dropped language in the petition impacting perhaps half the original area proposed.
I think I wrote the modified proposal which passed. I could be wrong, however. In any case, the modification accurately reflected the Walsh agreement modified by The Machine's outrageous misbehavior.
The formal presentations to the Cambridge Planning Board came earlier this month. I have downloaded the reports to my computer and would be pleased to pass them on to anybody who might be interested. Please just give me a ring at boblat@yahoo.com. I have done very little work on the reports.
Physically, the reports range in size from Harvard University’s, at 6 megs to Cambridge College’s at 480 KB. In between are the Massachusetts Institute of Technology at about 4 megs and Leslie University at a little over 1 meg.
The reports are solely Cambridge. A few months ago, this blog presented several reports on Harvard’s expansion plans in Allston. These reports were based in part on the Boston correlative of these reports. Allston is briefly mentioned on page 35 of Harvard’s Cambridge report.
On page 31 of its report, Harvard announces a change in one of my biggest victories, the Inn at Harvard, located at the eastern end of Harvard Square proper. Harvard wanted this building to be built 72% larger and built to the lot line. The Cambridge City Council voted into place a zoning change implementing an initiative drafted by me which brought about the current building. The vote was 7 for, 1 opposed, 1 in the hospital. Harvard announces that it will take this property out of hotel use and use it for student housing.
The Leslie report, at page 20, also brings back very happy memories. The map shows the first three blocks north of Harvard Law School containing what Leslie calls its “Doble Campus”. The southern two thirds of these blocks were the target of my first, and first successful, downzoning initiative.
It is decidedly flabbergasting to view the middle of these three blocks, between Mellen and Wendell Streets. This block is now overwhelmingly owned by Leslie. When we worked on that zoning, the blocks were pretty decrepit and mostly not part of part of Leslie. The block with all that Leslie property saw significant zoning changes to keep the neighborhood nature of the area.
As part of an acting gig a few weeks ago, I was in Harvard’s new law building on the corner of Everett Street and Massachusetts Avenue, across the street from the subject of that downzoning, and affected by it.
I am confused as to the maximum I can send through Yahoo Mail. I should think the MIT report is sendable. I hope the Harvard report is sendable. If it is not, I will provide the URL.
Please let me know if I can be of service.
Thank you.
Addendum:
Awkward language above on the Inn at Harvard zoning change. The petition concerned the East Harvard Square area. The petitioners accepted, with my strong approval, a compromise proposed by Councilor Walsh.
After typical bullying by the Cambridge Machine, including a key flat out lie, and over my strong objections, the petitioners dropped language in the petition impacting perhaps half the original area proposed.
I think I wrote the modified proposal which passed. I could be wrong, however. In any case, the modification accurately reflected the Walsh agreement modified by The Machine's outrageous misbehavior.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
The Charles River White Geese: Postmortem to the Blizzard.
I have checked on the Charles River White Geese at their Destroyed Nesting Area on the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, USA.
The first impression was distressing. I saw all that white in the Destroyed Nesting Area and saw nothing else.
Then I looked under the big tree which is their favorite place and made out their individual figures.
Years ago, when this nightmare began, we were repeatedly very much scared for them during bad weather events. This was a very bad blizzard, but it is not the worst they have lived through.
The Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese is very well protected from the elements.
These are free animals, free for generations. This is the life they know and love. They are free. The variations of weather is just part of being free.
Temperature problems is a standard concern for people who do not understand. The Charles River White Geese have goose down jackets. They are ideally adapted to the New England environment.
Their only significant problem is the combination of the heartless and destructive government of the City of Cambridge, the heartless and destructive government of Massachusetts, and the heartless and destructive Cambridge Machine, with the Cambridge Machine fighting to get the two governments and their friends whatever the Cambridge Machine can get away with.
That is a very major and outrageous problem for this 32 year resident gaggle of free animals.
The first impression was distressing. I saw all that white in the Destroyed Nesting Area and saw nothing else.
Then I looked under the big tree which is their favorite place and made out their individual figures.
Years ago, when this nightmare began, we were repeatedly very much scared for them during bad weather events. This was a very bad blizzard, but it is not the worst they have lived through.
The Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese is very well protected from the elements.
These are free animals, free for generations. This is the life they know and love. They are free. The variations of weather is just part of being free.
Temperature problems is a standard concern for people who do not understand. The Charles River White Geese have goose down jackets. They are ideally adapted to the New England environment.
Their only significant problem is the combination of the heartless and destructive government of the City of Cambridge, the heartless and destructive government of Massachusetts, and the heartless and destructive Cambridge Machine, with the Cambridge Machine fighting to get the two governments and their friends whatever the Cambridge Machine can get away with.
That is a very major and outrageous problem for this 32 year resident gaggle of free animals.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Cher: 1 out of 4 of her swans seen. Heartless abuse in context
1. Swan Report.
2. In Context.
1. Swan Report.
Cher reported at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/cher-charles-river-white-geese-seeking.html, that four swan friends of hers were missing, ALONG WITH THE PROTECTION SHE HAD LEFT FOR THEM.
We had a positive report that two pair of new swans were seen on the Charles River in Watertown, but that did not sound right to her.
A few days ago, Cher sighted the male of the parent couple of the swans. He recognized her and responded to her call. He was decidedly bedraggled. She did not see his mate nor their children.
2. In Context.
Well, let’s see.
Cambridge and the Department of Conservation and Recreation are deliberately starving the Charles River White Geese along with dumping poisons on the Magazine Beach playing fields to keep alive sickly grass they introduced there after destroying healthy, responsible grass which survived without poisons for the better part of a century. They decreased the size of the playing fields to drain off the poisons which should not be dumped on the banks of the Charles.
They promised a “lawn” to the Charles River and have walled off access between the Magazine Beach playing fields and the Charles River. The key manager, R. Corsi, does not understand the concept of regularly chopping down bushes, but the DCR regularly chops down bushes all over the place. R. Corsi has publicly bragged that the wall starves the Charles River White Geese.
The DCR has blocked off a boat dock which gave access to the Charles River for the better part of a century with more bizarre bushes and a silly bridge over a fake pond which they have since destroyed.
The opening remaining is apparently intended for access to a new highway in the Charles to go under the BU Bridge and do further damage to the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese. That planned highway could explain the lack of vegetation next to the BU Bridge in the Destroyed Nesting Area. Half of the Destroyed Nesting Area has had planted more of the DCR’s introduced bushes which the DCR will not understand how to chop down regularly and serve as more abuse.
The new highway, of course, is slated to destroy hundreds of excellent trees between the BU Bridge and the second Bridge to the east, the Longfellow Bridge.
The DCR tried to get Obama money for that destruction lying that all the targeted trees were diseased. They proved that a lie with their filings with Cambridge.
R. Corsi has proposed to extend the outrage at the Magazine Beach playing fields east ward. He wants to start by destroying grass on the top of that hill which is environmentally responsible and which makes his sickly introduced grass look bad. He want the bizarre small vehicle highway built in this area as well.
A key governor appointee has taken steps to assist destruction under the next three bridges to the west comparable to the destruction planned under the BU Bridge.
The hilltop plans would destroy a beautiful, little, environmentally responsible parking lot at the top of the hill west of the playing fields. That little parking lot is needed by little guys who use the picnic area there.
But those are little guys, and we are dealing with people who take pride, as with the Charles River White Geese and the Revere swans, in destroying the little guy as much as they can get away with.
R. Corsi used the words “not negotiable,” and the Machine falls all over itself in favor of “improvements” no matter how irresponsible or destructive. The more useless the work, the more the welfare for the contractors.
And then there is the Cambridge Common and Flagstaff park, and Danehy fields, and Alewife, and Fresh Pond, and prior destruction I am familiar with, and planned destruction I am not aware of.
The Cambridge Machine says to look at Kendall and Central. The Machine brags about air quality “improvements” at Alewife while mentioning key properties which would prevent their intended massive destruction of the Alewife reservation, its trees and its centuries resident animals. But the Machine, somehow, just cannot notice responsible alternatives to irresponsible destruction. And they have spent 14 years lying that they were concerned about the irreplaceable forest of the Alewife reservation.
When the Cambridge Machine sounds the most pious, my immediate question is always what are they trying to hide, what are they trying destroy as part of their latest “initiative”?
On the latest attack to the Charles River, the Machine started off with an attempt to bless the extension of the Magazine Beach outrage, then made noises about objecting to the destruction of the little guys’ parking lot. Then, after responsible comments from people there, the Machine delayed action, perhaps to bring out unthinking troops who will rubber stamp the extension of the Magazine Beach outrage? While they continue to deny the existence of the last 13 years?
In Chelsea and Revere, MA, the environmental problems are hidden through fairly justifiable lack of knowledge. In Cambridge, MA, the environmental problems are kept hidden through a well established and corrupt tradition of controlled, fake groups. At least, in Chelsea and Revere, the outrages and the guilty are not falsely praised as “holier” than thou.
2. In Context.
1. Swan Report.
Cher reported at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/cher-charles-river-white-geese-seeking.html, that four swan friends of hers were missing, ALONG WITH THE PROTECTION SHE HAD LEFT FOR THEM.
We had a positive report that two pair of new swans were seen on the Charles River in Watertown, but that did not sound right to her.
A few days ago, Cher sighted the male of the parent couple of the swans. He recognized her and responded to her call. He was decidedly bedraggled. She did not see his mate nor their children.
2. In Context.
Well, let’s see.
Cambridge and the Department of Conservation and Recreation are deliberately starving the Charles River White Geese along with dumping poisons on the Magazine Beach playing fields to keep alive sickly grass they introduced there after destroying healthy, responsible grass which survived without poisons for the better part of a century. They decreased the size of the playing fields to drain off the poisons which should not be dumped on the banks of the Charles.
They promised a “lawn” to the Charles River and have walled off access between the Magazine Beach playing fields and the Charles River. The key manager, R. Corsi, does not understand the concept of regularly chopping down bushes, but the DCR regularly chops down bushes all over the place. R. Corsi has publicly bragged that the wall starves the Charles River White Geese.
The DCR has blocked off a boat dock which gave access to the Charles River for the better part of a century with more bizarre bushes and a silly bridge over a fake pond which they have since destroyed.
The opening remaining is apparently intended for access to a new highway in the Charles to go under the BU Bridge and do further damage to the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese. That planned highway could explain the lack of vegetation next to the BU Bridge in the Destroyed Nesting Area. Half of the Destroyed Nesting Area has had planted more of the DCR’s introduced bushes which the DCR will not understand how to chop down regularly and serve as more abuse.
The new highway, of course, is slated to destroy hundreds of excellent trees between the BU Bridge and the second Bridge to the east, the Longfellow Bridge.
The DCR tried to get Obama money for that destruction lying that all the targeted trees were diseased. They proved that a lie with their filings with Cambridge.
R. Corsi has proposed to extend the outrage at the Magazine Beach playing fields east ward. He wants to start by destroying grass on the top of that hill which is environmentally responsible and which makes his sickly introduced grass look bad. He want the bizarre small vehicle highway built in this area as well.
A key governor appointee has taken steps to assist destruction under the next three bridges to the west comparable to the destruction planned under the BU Bridge.
The hilltop plans would destroy a beautiful, little, environmentally responsible parking lot at the top of the hill west of the playing fields. That little parking lot is needed by little guys who use the picnic area there.
But those are little guys, and we are dealing with people who take pride, as with the Charles River White Geese and the Revere swans, in destroying the little guy as much as they can get away with.
R. Corsi used the words “not negotiable,” and the Machine falls all over itself in favor of “improvements” no matter how irresponsible or destructive. The more useless the work, the more the welfare for the contractors.
And then there is the Cambridge Common and Flagstaff park, and Danehy fields, and Alewife, and Fresh Pond, and prior destruction I am familiar with, and planned destruction I am not aware of.
The Cambridge Machine says to look at Kendall and Central. The Machine brags about air quality “improvements” at Alewife while mentioning key properties which would prevent their intended massive destruction of the Alewife reservation, its trees and its centuries resident animals. But the Machine, somehow, just cannot notice responsible alternatives to irresponsible destruction. And they have spent 14 years lying that they were concerned about the irreplaceable forest of the Alewife reservation.
When the Cambridge Machine sounds the most pious, my immediate question is always what are they trying to hide, what are they trying destroy as part of their latest “initiative”?
On the latest attack to the Charles River, the Machine started off with an attempt to bless the extension of the Magazine Beach outrage, then made noises about objecting to the destruction of the little guys’ parking lot. Then, after responsible comments from people there, the Machine delayed action, perhaps to bring out unthinking troops who will rubber stamp the extension of the Magazine Beach outrage? While they continue to deny the existence of the last 13 years?
In Chelsea and Revere, MA, the environmental problems are hidden through fairly justifiable lack of knowledge. In Cambridge, MA, the environmental problems are kept hidden through a well established and corrupt tradition of controlled, fake groups. At least, in Chelsea and Revere, the outrages and the guilty are not falsely praised as “holier” than thou.
Friday, February 08, 2013
Blizzard of 2013 and the Charles River White Geese; Last Parking Lot Photos
1. Blizzard of 2013.
2. Heartless Parking.
1. Blizzard of 2013.
Even before the heartless abuse by Cambridge, MA, and the Commonwealth of Mass. started, the Charles River White Geese went to their nesting area in bad weather.
This is because the layout makes the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese ideal for natural protection. The stories high BU Bridge blocks winds on the west. The Grand Junction Railroad Bridge and major trees lining the Charles River block winds from the south. The hillside supporting the Grand Junction railroad along with major trees east of it blocks winds from the east. And the on ramp to Memorial Drive, with its supporting hillside, plus Memorial Drive to the North blocks wind from that direction.
If the snow gets too deep in the Destroyed Nesting Area, they possibly could retreat to the frozen river.
2. Heartless Parking.
On January 17, 2013, I posted photos from December 14, 2012.
I still have photos from December 28, 2012.
[12-09, 12-28, DNA]
[13-08, 12-28, DNA]
[14-07, 12-28, DNA]
[15-06, 12-28, DNA]
[16-05, 12-28, DNA]
[17-04, 12-28, DNA]
The building in the background is a structure owned by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on the north side of Memorial Drive.
The brick band is Memorial Drive. The responsible people who worked on the BU Bridge parked under Memorial Drive including in this location. The location where the responsible workers worked would have been behind the camera.
This vehicle is in the Destroyed Nesting Area. The Commuter Rail Workers were too lazy to walk this short distance and instead add to the heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese with their irresponsible parking in this environmentally sensitive area, their last home which has not been destroyed to the Charles River White Geese.
And the reprehensible Department of Conservation and Recreation has a goal: kill off all animals living in the Charles River Basin.
They, along with Cambridge, killed hundreds of residents animals at Alewife in October - November 2011 as part of their bizarre destruction of acres of the Alewife reservation for a project which should be done on nearby property and which will not achieve its stated goals by destroying Alewife without destroying a very much larger part of Alewife.
The animals heartlessly killed as part of the bizarre Alewife project have lived there many generations.
And the Cambridge Machine runs around lying that these heartless destroyers are holier than thou.
The DCR, Cambridge and the Cambridge Machine are really rotten people.
[18-03, 12-28, DNA]
2. Heartless Parking.
1. Blizzard of 2013.
Even before the heartless abuse by Cambridge, MA, and the Commonwealth of Mass. started, the Charles River White Geese went to their nesting area in bad weather.
This is because the layout makes the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese ideal for natural protection. The stories high BU Bridge blocks winds on the west. The Grand Junction Railroad Bridge and major trees lining the Charles River block winds from the south. The hillside supporting the Grand Junction railroad along with major trees east of it blocks winds from the east. And the on ramp to Memorial Drive, with its supporting hillside, plus Memorial Drive to the North blocks wind from that direction.
If the snow gets too deep in the Destroyed Nesting Area, they possibly could retreat to the frozen river.
2. Heartless Parking.
On January 17, 2013, I posted photos from December 14, 2012.
I still have photos from December 28, 2012.
[12-09, 12-28, DNA]
[13-08, 12-28, DNA]
[14-07, 12-28, DNA]
[15-06, 12-28, DNA]
[16-05, 12-28, DNA]
[17-04, 12-28, DNA]
The building in the background is a structure owned by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on the north side of Memorial Drive.
The brick band is Memorial Drive. The responsible people who worked on the BU Bridge parked under Memorial Drive including in this location. The location where the responsible workers worked would have been behind the camera.
This vehicle is in the Destroyed Nesting Area. The Commuter Rail Workers were too lazy to walk this short distance and instead add to the heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese with their irresponsible parking in this environmentally sensitive area, their last home which has not been destroyed to the Charles River White Geese.
And the reprehensible Department of Conservation and Recreation has a goal: kill off all animals living in the Charles River Basin.
They, along with Cambridge, killed hundreds of residents animals at Alewife in October - November 2011 as part of their bizarre destruction of acres of the Alewife reservation for a project which should be done on nearby property and which will not achieve its stated goals by destroying Alewife without destroying a very much larger part of Alewife.
The animals heartlessly killed as part of the bizarre Alewife project have lived there many generations.
And the Cambridge Machine runs around lying that these heartless destroyers are holier than thou.
The DCR, Cambridge and the Cambridge Machine are really rotten people.
[18-03, 12-28, DNA]
Wednesday, February 06, 2013
Correction: Large Birds Sighted on the Charles River in Watertown, MA, were Swans
1. Introduction.
2. Correction, Swans, not White Geese.
3. Cher on the Swans.
1. Introduction.
We have been reporting the latest severe abuse of the Charles River White Geese through the use of their nesting area as a parking lot.
This has expanded into the Department of Conservation and Recreation offering a proposal to extend the DCR’s outrageously irresponsible behavior at the Magazine Beach playing fields westward.
Cher reported the disappearance (and probable killing) of swans living on DCR property in Revere on a river feeding into Boston harbor.
In the middle of this, Shelley reported seeing four white geese on the Charles River near Watertown, MA, which is a few miles west of the normal habitat of the Charles River White Geese.
2. Correction, Swans, not White Geese.
Shelley writes:
So sorry. I'd been reading your heart-rending email about the geese and typed "white geese" by mistake in emailing you. It should read, "two couple of swans." Sorry!!
********
I think Shelley is due an apology from me. I do summaries of these reports on facebook and by email. I anticipate I confused her.
The reality is that we are dealing with truly rotten people lying that they are holier than thou. They do so many terrible things, it really is hard to keep things straight or to believe that they could stoop so low. Decent people are overwhelmed by and cannot conceive of public officials as extremely bad as are City of Cambridge and the Department of Conservation and Recreation.
You add to this the corruption of the Cambridge Machine running around lying that these evil entities are “holier than thou” and there are good reasons to be confused.
3. Cher on the Swans.
I asked Cher if these swans could be her friends. She replied:
*********
I rather doubt that it is. There are mute swans along the waterways in very conceivable inlet along the Charles and other salt water ways, but they prefer fresh water and need it for nutritional purposes etc.
I don't have info about what happened to the [swans] but all tarps and other paraphernalia were removed last year. I have seen many pairs in Everett, Medford, and into Cambridge. I also have heard of them in Winthrop. My pair when I last saw them had two offspring, a male and a female left, and they were growing up. I hope that they found mates.
It is conceivable that they each left to find mates and will return, but I don't know if that is so. I don’t know as stated what happened to the parents either. I hope that they moved to another area.
I put forth great efforts in order to get a wildlife agency or other org to take them when here were just two, Gus and Gina. The remaining offspring of Gus and Gina were named Chelsea and Revere because they were born on the Chealsea-Revere line at what used to be known as the Chelsea Creek now run by DCR who has been against having the swans there from the beginning.
Many mute swans have traveled from warmer places to here and live thru the winters however swans only can survive for max of 5 yrs in the wild, the winters that is. If taken in for the winter they will live a very long time, three times that in the wild at least.
I have tried to find out what happened to them but I cared for them up to the year 2012, and the last documentation is at YouTube in 2009. Doesn’t help much.
So, likely whereever my beauties are, they will be at least six, more likely up to eight to twelve of them now if Mother Nature prevailed. Sorry I can't help more.
One last note, if she sees them again, now she has their names, to which at least Gus might respond, or Chelsea and Revere, but Gina, not so much.
**********
Cher's lack of knowledge comes because of illness.
2. Correction, Swans, not White Geese.
3. Cher on the Swans.
1. Introduction.
We have been reporting the latest severe abuse of the Charles River White Geese through the use of their nesting area as a parking lot.
This has expanded into the Department of Conservation and Recreation offering a proposal to extend the DCR’s outrageously irresponsible behavior at the Magazine Beach playing fields westward.
Cher reported the disappearance (and probable killing) of swans living on DCR property in Revere on a river feeding into Boston harbor.
In the middle of this, Shelley reported seeing four white geese on the Charles River near Watertown, MA, which is a few miles west of the normal habitat of the Charles River White Geese.
2. Correction, Swans, not White Geese.
Shelley writes:
So sorry. I'd been reading your heart-rending email about the geese and typed "white geese" by mistake in emailing you. It should read, "two couple of swans." Sorry!!
********
I think Shelley is due an apology from me. I do summaries of these reports on facebook and by email. I anticipate I confused her.
The reality is that we are dealing with truly rotten people lying that they are holier than thou. They do so many terrible things, it really is hard to keep things straight or to believe that they could stoop so low. Decent people are overwhelmed by and cannot conceive of public officials as extremely bad as are City of Cambridge and the Department of Conservation and Recreation.
You add to this the corruption of the Cambridge Machine running around lying that these evil entities are “holier than thou” and there are good reasons to be confused.
3. Cher on the Swans.
I asked Cher if these swans could be her friends. She replied:
*********
I rather doubt that it is. There are mute swans along the waterways in very conceivable inlet along the Charles and other salt water ways, but they prefer fresh water and need it for nutritional purposes etc.
I don't have info about what happened to the [swans] but all tarps and other paraphernalia were removed last year. I have seen many pairs in Everett, Medford, and into Cambridge. I also have heard of them in Winthrop. My pair when I last saw them had two offspring, a male and a female left, and they were growing up. I hope that they found mates.
It is conceivable that they each left to find mates and will return, but I don't know if that is so. I don’t know as stated what happened to the parents either. I hope that they moved to another area.
I put forth great efforts in order to get a wildlife agency or other org to take them when here were just two, Gus and Gina. The remaining offspring of Gus and Gina were named Chelsea and Revere because they were born on the Chealsea-Revere line at what used to be known as the Chelsea Creek now run by DCR who has been against having the swans there from the beginning.
Many mute swans have traveled from warmer places to here and live thru the winters however swans only can survive for max of 5 yrs in the wild, the winters that is. If taken in for the winter they will live a very long time, three times that in the wild at least.
I have tried to find out what happened to them but I cared for them up to the year 2012, and the last documentation is at YouTube in 2009. Doesn’t help much.
So, likely whereever my beauties are, they will be at least six, more likely up to eight to twelve of them now if Mother Nature prevailed. Sorry I can't help more.
One last note, if she sees them again, now she has their names, to which at least Gus might respond, or Chelsea and Revere, but Gina, not so much.
**********
Cher's lack of knowledge comes because of illness.
Monday, February 04, 2013
Shelley: White Geese on the Charles River in Watertown, MA, USA; Cher 3
1. Shelley reports, Watertown, MA, USA.
2. Analysis.
3. Cher 3.
1. Shelley reports, Watertown, MA, USA.
Two couples of white geese have been present recently on the Charles in Watertown.
2. Analysis.
Watertown, MA’s riverfront access is only a few miles from the habitat of the Charles River White Geese.
It is common to see one or two free white geese near water in many places. Two couples is unusual.
The Charles River White Geese wander in search of food. And they wander in groups.
They have been heartlessly abused by truly rotten people from the Cambridge and Massachusetts governments hiding behind the corrupt Cambridge pol organization.
It is quite possible that these two couples of White Geese have wandered to Watertown, MA, trying to relieve themselves from the heartless abuse inflicted on them in their thirty two year habitat on the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, USA.
The last thing which would be appropriate even if these were members of the gaggle would be to interfere with them.
It is not that difficult to get back from Watertown.
They are not that far from home, and they would be terrified if humans interfered with them.
Animals are not fools. The rotten situation in Cambridge communicates way too much.
And they are not smart enough to fool themselves into believing in the bizarre rationalizations which are normal among the Cambridge Machine.
Thank you, Shelley.
3. Cher 3.
Cher comments on the bureaucrats calling Swans “invasive species.”
This is the sort of sickness which is part of the script used by the rotters to justify the latest rotten behavior.
They take terms which make sense in a totally different circumstance and use and abuse those words to justify heartless abuse.
I do not recall even the slightest use of this term to justify the mass killings at Alewife. The mass killings at Alewife were down by Cambridge and the DCR. The killings are being managed by the Cambridge Machine which, by its usual stalling, is fighting to expand the killings and environmental destruction.
Those mass killings are "non reality" just as the outrage of the last thirteen years of outrage on the Charles River “does not exist” to those whose minds are controlled by the Cambridge Pols.
The DCR is reprehensible. The City of Cambridge, MA, USA is reprehensible. The Cambridge Pols are corrupt and reprehensible. Not to say that the DCR and Cambridge are not corrupt.
These rotters make their own vileness that much worse by lying that they are “holier than thou.”
2. Analysis.
3. Cher 3.
1. Shelley reports, Watertown, MA, USA.
Two couples of white geese have been present recently on the Charles in Watertown.
2. Analysis.
Watertown, MA’s riverfront access is only a few miles from the habitat of the Charles River White Geese.
It is common to see one or two free white geese near water in many places. Two couples is unusual.
The Charles River White Geese wander in search of food. And they wander in groups.
They have been heartlessly abused by truly rotten people from the Cambridge and Massachusetts governments hiding behind the corrupt Cambridge pol organization.
It is quite possible that these two couples of White Geese have wandered to Watertown, MA, trying to relieve themselves from the heartless abuse inflicted on them in their thirty two year habitat on the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, USA.
The last thing which would be appropriate even if these were members of the gaggle would be to interfere with them.
It is not that difficult to get back from Watertown.
They are not that far from home, and they would be terrified if humans interfered with them.
Animals are not fools. The rotten situation in Cambridge communicates way too much.
And they are not smart enough to fool themselves into believing in the bizarre rationalizations which are normal among the Cambridge Machine.
Thank you, Shelley.
3. Cher 3.
Cher comments on the bureaucrats calling Swans “invasive species.”
This is the sort of sickness which is part of the script used by the rotters to justify the latest rotten behavior.
They take terms which make sense in a totally different circumstance and use and abuse those words to justify heartless abuse.
I do not recall even the slightest use of this term to justify the mass killings at Alewife. The mass killings at Alewife were down by Cambridge and the DCR. The killings are being managed by the Cambridge Machine which, by its usual stalling, is fighting to expand the killings and environmental destruction.
Those mass killings are "non reality" just as the outrage of the last thirteen years of outrage on the Charles River “does not exist” to those whose minds are controlled by the Cambridge Pols.
The DCR is reprehensible. The City of Cambridge, MA, USA is reprehensible. The Cambridge Pols are corrupt and reprehensible. Not to say that the DCR and Cambridge are not corrupt.
These rotters make their own vileness that much worse by lying that they are “holier than thou.”
Cher 2, Feeding the Charles River White Geese, Swans
1. Cher’s Response to my Post on her last Communication
2. My own limitations in context with the true rottenness of the Cambridge Machine.
3. How are they feeding the geese?
1. Cher’s Response to my Post on her last Communication
Cher responds, with minimal editing.
Note that this is not a normal situation. The situation in Cambridge with the corrupt Cambridge Machine lying that it is doing what decent people would do and thus preventing action is a very unusual situation.
*********
God Bless you Bob, and thank you so much. I am actually crying now as I read your copy because I am so unable to accomplish anything myself. I thank you every so much. I have a question, tho, how are they feeding the geese? I mean where are they fed etc. Do you know the routine? What will become of them traversing the streets like that?
You are well aware of the plight of Canadian Geese and how they are in small flocks all over the US. They move about from even the tiniest pool or water in scraps of grass anywhere even in the middle of Boston, and cities like that which are heavily trafficked. It hurts me to see them. It honestly hurts my soul an my heart and it the same when I see the white geese, even wild turkeys.
I plan to go to surrounding waterways looking for the swans I cared for. If they are there they will come to me. There are mute swans at every saltwater area that has a fresh water inlet eg Medford, Winthrop etc etc etc.
I am so happy that we have you Bob. I feel terrible and wish I could do more. I don’t want the geese to suffer nor the swans nor anything. I know it is life but that doesn’t mean you turn your back in apathy to it. You know all of this. G I should never write at night as I have told you before as I tend to ramble on and on and on. Bless you Bob.
2. My own limitations in context with the true rottenness of the Cambridge Machine.
Thank you, Cher, for your kind words. But we all are limited in what we can do. One trouble is that a lot of people make money out of environmental destruction and heartless animal abuse. A lot of such people are major parts of the Cambridge Machine.
I honestly do not know the details of how the Charles River White Geese are being fed. I spend many hours on environmental communications. The reality is that if I, also, feed the geese, they would be killed in the long run.
This is because of the corruption of the City of Cambridge and the State Bureaucracy. More than that, it is because of the corrupt Cambridge Machine, lying that it is on the side of decency, and maneuvering people away from the things which need to be done. By lying that it is doing the right thing and maneuvering people away, this reprehensible organization is responsible for mass animal killing, animal abuse, and mass environmental destruction.
Folks who would like to help feed the Charles River White Geese are encouraged to visit their Destroyed Nesting Area and talk with Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative folks feeding them. The Destroyed Nesting Area is on the north bank of the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, immediately east of the BU Bridge.
Folks who would like to help with political matters are encouraged to email me at boblat@yahoo.com. Much more important, however, is money, money, money. Standing up to a well established tradition of corruption costs money. Please give.
At the top of our blog at charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com is a Donate button. We are set up with PayPal to accept contributions through them. They accept all major credit cards, but do charge a processing fee. Last time I used it, the fee was $1.00. Direct mail of checks made out to Friends of the White Geese to Robert J. La Trémouille, PO Box 391412, Cambridge, MA 02139, is a little more old fashioned but very effective. Thank you.
3. How are they feeding the geese?
I cannot specifically say. I cannot directly participate, but I have done what I can on occasion.
The Charles River White Geese are fed once or twice a day. They bring food to the Destroyed Nesting Area for the benefit of the Charles River White Geese and other needy, free animals. I should think CRUWI also would appreciate monetary assistance, but I am not in direct contact with them. Neither CRUWI nor FOWG is tax deductible.
Feeding of the Charles River White Geese is a major effort. We did not realize just how major an effort until Cambridge and the State Bureaucracy started heartlessly starving them. The latest public presentation by the DCR is their effort to expand the outrages at the Magazine Beach playing field to the banks of the Charles River west of the playing fields.
The Charles River White Geese have lived on the Cambridge side of the Charles River since 1981 in a mile long habitat centered on the BU Bridge. They spent much of their days feeding at the Magazine Beach playing fields, and slept there or in the Charles River off the playing fields. In the spring they would go to the now Destroyed Nesting Area for mating and rearing their offspring. They are free animals with a very strong family structure.
Their best friend from about 1996, or earlier, was Reen LittleBrook, a native American who bought breads including leftovers from homeless shelters. Their real diet was the grass at the Magazine Beach playing fields. LittleBrook also cared for their injuries using native remedies.
At a little bit before the time the heartless people who hide behind the Cambridge Machine started deliberately starving the Charles River White Geese, LittleBrook was hit by a car. He got a bicycle one day and was hit by a car either the next day or the day after it. LittleBrook spent months in a nursing home recuperating his very battered self. He has visited the Charles River White Geese as often as he can since then, but his physical capabilities are very limited.
Marilyn Wellons stepped in and took over the breads feeding.
When the heartless people who hide behind the Cambridge Machine started starving the Charles River White Geese, Marilyn was forced to do real research on their dietary needs, and she realized just how major the grass at the Magazine Beach playing fields was to their livelihood. During the months she cared for them, she became a regular patron of merchants who provided a very healthy and balanced diet.
We created the Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative to have a separate feeding organization.
The Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative took over for Marilyn and has done an heroic job keeping these magnificent creatures alive in spite of the rottenness of the Cambridge Machine and the rotten people who hide behind them.
The organization is separate from the political arm, Friends of the White Geese. I have negligible contact with them, but they are very active and very, very valuable.
2. My own limitations in context with the true rottenness of the Cambridge Machine.
3. How are they feeding the geese?
1. Cher’s Response to my Post on her last Communication
Cher responds, with minimal editing.
Note that this is not a normal situation. The situation in Cambridge with the corrupt Cambridge Machine lying that it is doing what decent people would do and thus preventing action is a very unusual situation.
*********
God Bless you Bob, and thank you so much. I am actually crying now as I read your copy because I am so unable to accomplish anything myself. I thank you every so much. I have a question, tho, how are they feeding the geese? I mean where are they fed etc. Do you know the routine? What will become of them traversing the streets like that?
You are well aware of the plight of Canadian Geese and how they are in small flocks all over the US. They move about from even the tiniest pool or water in scraps of grass anywhere even in the middle of Boston, and cities like that which are heavily trafficked. It hurts me to see them. It honestly hurts my soul an my heart and it the same when I see the white geese, even wild turkeys.
I plan to go to surrounding waterways looking for the swans I cared for. If they are there they will come to me. There are mute swans at every saltwater area that has a fresh water inlet eg Medford, Winthrop etc etc etc.
I am so happy that we have you Bob. I feel terrible and wish I could do more. I don’t want the geese to suffer nor the swans nor anything. I know it is life but that doesn’t mean you turn your back in apathy to it. You know all of this. G I should never write at night as I have told you before as I tend to ramble on and on and on. Bless you Bob.
2. My own limitations in context with the true rottenness of the Cambridge Machine.
Thank you, Cher, for your kind words. But we all are limited in what we can do. One trouble is that a lot of people make money out of environmental destruction and heartless animal abuse. A lot of such people are major parts of the Cambridge Machine.
I honestly do not know the details of how the Charles River White Geese are being fed. I spend many hours on environmental communications. The reality is that if I, also, feed the geese, they would be killed in the long run.
This is because of the corruption of the City of Cambridge and the State Bureaucracy. More than that, it is because of the corrupt Cambridge Machine, lying that it is on the side of decency, and maneuvering people away from the things which need to be done. By lying that it is doing the right thing and maneuvering people away, this reprehensible organization is responsible for mass animal killing, animal abuse, and mass environmental destruction.
Folks who would like to help feed the Charles River White Geese are encouraged to visit their Destroyed Nesting Area and talk with Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative folks feeding them. The Destroyed Nesting Area is on the north bank of the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, immediately east of the BU Bridge.
Folks who would like to help with political matters are encouraged to email me at boblat@yahoo.com. Much more important, however, is money, money, money. Standing up to a well established tradition of corruption costs money. Please give.
At the top of our blog at charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com is a Donate button. We are set up with PayPal to accept contributions through them. They accept all major credit cards, but do charge a processing fee. Last time I used it, the fee was $1.00. Direct mail of checks made out to Friends of the White Geese to Robert J. La Trémouille, PO Box 391412, Cambridge, MA 02139, is a little more old fashioned but very effective. Thank you.
3. How are they feeding the geese?
I cannot specifically say. I cannot directly participate, but I have done what I can on occasion.
The Charles River White Geese are fed once or twice a day. They bring food to the Destroyed Nesting Area for the benefit of the Charles River White Geese and other needy, free animals. I should think CRUWI also would appreciate monetary assistance, but I am not in direct contact with them. Neither CRUWI nor FOWG is tax deductible.
Feeding of the Charles River White Geese is a major effort. We did not realize just how major an effort until Cambridge and the State Bureaucracy started heartlessly starving them. The latest public presentation by the DCR is their effort to expand the outrages at the Magazine Beach playing field to the banks of the Charles River west of the playing fields.
The Charles River White Geese have lived on the Cambridge side of the Charles River since 1981 in a mile long habitat centered on the BU Bridge. They spent much of their days feeding at the Magazine Beach playing fields, and slept there or in the Charles River off the playing fields. In the spring they would go to the now Destroyed Nesting Area for mating and rearing their offspring. They are free animals with a very strong family structure.
Their best friend from about 1996, or earlier, was Reen LittleBrook, a native American who bought breads including leftovers from homeless shelters. Their real diet was the grass at the Magazine Beach playing fields. LittleBrook also cared for their injuries using native remedies.
At a little bit before the time the heartless people who hide behind the Cambridge Machine started deliberately starving the Charles River White Geese, LittleBrook was hit by a car. He got a bicycle one day and was hit by a car either the next day or the day after it. LittleBrook spent months in a nursing home recuperating his very battered self. He has visited the Charles River White Geese as often as he can since then, but his physical capabilities are very limited.
Marilyn Wellons stepped in and took over the breads feeding.
When the heartless people who hide behind the Cambridge Machine started starving the Charles River White Geese, Marilyn was forced to do real research on their dietary needs, and she realized just how major the grass at the Magazine Beach playing fields was to their livelihood. During the months she cared for them, she became a regular patron of merchants who provided a very healthy and balanced diet.
We created the Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative to have a separate feeding organization.
The Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative took over for Marilyn and has done an heroic job keeping these magnificent creatures alive in spite of the rottenness of the Cambridge Machine and the rotten people who hide behind them.
The organization is separate from the political arm, Friends of the White Geese. I have negligible contact with them, but they are very active and very, very valuable.
Sunday, February 03, 2013
Cher: Charles River White Geese seeking food; Swans in Revere, MA
1. Report from the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
2. Response.
3. Swans in Revere.
4. Response.
I have received a welcome report from Cher.
1. Report from the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
Cher:
Yesterday (February 2, 2013). I was on my way home from the doctors and was halted before the stop sign where the white geese used to have a home. All the cars stopped to let them cross the street..Memorial Drive...almost everyone had smiles on their faces, so amused and thought it so cute to them like that.
I mean, what can be done for these fowl? They surely will die like this, walking all over Memorial Drive, drive from their homes.
2. Response.
This is the real rottenness of Cambridge, the Department of Conservation and Recreation and their fake groups.
Until the attacks from Cambridge, the DCR and their friends started, the Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese was enclosed so that people had to climb over a not overly high fence to get into it.
The first actions in the ongoing outrage were by Boston University. BU, among other things, broke an opening in the fence.
Since then, Cambridge and the DCR have starved the Charles River White Geese by walling off their food at Magazine Beach from the Charles River by bizarre, never trimmed, introduced bushes. This left their nesting area the only place in the Charles River White Geese’ mile long habitat of 32 years that they can call home.
But there is no food in the Destroyed Nesting Area. What little food there was has been destroyed by the Charles River “Conservancy” with the assistance of irresponsible maintenance people driving vehicles on top of the sensitive environment.
So the Charles River White Geese walk through the BU created opening. They cross an on ramp to Memorial Drive which abuts the Destroyed Nesting Area to get some food under Memorial Drive.
The Charles River White Geese are more responsible pedestrians than the typical New Englander. They come out on the sidewalk and look both ways before crossing.
Their problem is that, while they are very responsible before crossing, they cross like a bunch of geese. There are usually more than just a few doing the crossing and they all try to cross together. Then again, geese do not cross in a straight line. When I have seen them crossing, I have shushed across the stragglers.
Always the drivers are pleased with these beauties and very patient.
The love of the drivers and other decent people for the Charles River White Geese is exactly the reason why the DCR has spent years lying that they have no intention to do harm to them. And why the Cambridge Machine is creating their usual fake group to fool people into ignoring reality on the Charles River.
A group created by but totally independent of Friends of the White Geese feeds the Charles River White Geese to keep them from starving. This is the Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative. Volunteers can volunteer by talking with one of the feeders at the Destroyed Nesting Area.
In the meantime, as I posted yesterday, the DCR is seeking the support of the Cambridge Machine to expand the existing outrage further west.
The Cambridge Machine is very predictable. They always “mean so well,” and they pretty much always help destructive bureaucrats and pols destroy. But they do a lot of “soul searching” and they “compromise” in the Cambridge Machine tradition. “Compromise” in the Cambridge Machine tradition means the bad guys get to do whatever they want and the “good guys” get to declare victory.
3. Swans in Revere.
Cher:
BTW the swans are gone. Some of the people there were so nasty, I don't know what happened to them at all. One mallard likes me and comes to me if I go out. I never get out more than twice a month.
4. Response.
I hope I got the municipality (Revere) right.
Cher has been caring for swans living on a river feeding into Boston Harbor on property owned by the Department of Conservation and Recreation.
I hope her swan friends decided to migrate. The other alternative is related to the fact that the DCR owns the place and the DCR is destructive to animals. Her swan friends do not have the visibility and constituency of the Charles River White Geese.
2. Response.
3. Swans in Revere.
4. Response.
I have received a welcome report from Cher.
1. Report from the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
Cher:
Yesterday (February 2, 2013). I was on my way home from the doctors and was halted before the stop sign where the white geese used to have a home. All the cars stopped to let them cross the street..Memorial Drive...almost everyone had smiles on their faces, so amused and thought it so cute to them like that.
I mean, what can be done for these fowl? They surely will die like this, walking all over Memorial Drive, drive from their homes.
2. Response.
This is the real rottenness of Cambridge, the Department of Conservation and Recreation and their fake groups.
Until the attacks from Cambridge, the DCR and their friends started, the Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese was enclosed so that people had to climb over a not overly high fence to get into it.
The first actions in the ongoing outrage were by Boston University. BU, among other things, broke an opening in the fence.
Since then, Cambridge and the DCR have starved the Charles River White Geese by walling off their food at Magazine Beach from the Charles River by bizarre, never trimmed, introduced bushes. This left their nesting area the only place in the Charles River White Geese’ mile long habitat of 32 years that they can call home.
But there is no food in the Destroyed Nesting Area. What little food there was has been destroyed by the Charles River “Conservancy” with the assistance of irresponsible maintenance people driving vehicles on top of the sensitive environment.
So the Charles River White Geese walk through the BU created opening. They cross an on ramp to Memorial Drive which abuts the Destroyed Nesting Area to get some food under Memorial Drive.
The Charles River White Geese are more responsible pedestrians than the typical New Englander. They come out on the sidewalk and look both ways before crossing.
Their problem is that, while they are very responsible before crossing, they cross like a bunch of geese. There are usually more than just a few doing the crossing and they all try to cross together. Then again, geese do not cross in a straight line. When I have seen them crossing, I have shushed across the stragglers.
Always the drivers are pleased with these beauties and very patient.
The love of the drivers and other decent people for the Charles River White Geese is exactly the reason why the DCR has spent years lying that they have no intention to do harm to them. And why the Cambridge Machine is creating their usual fake group to fool people into ignoring reality on the Charles River.
A group created by but totally independent of Friends of the White Geese feeds the Charles River White Geese to keep them from starving. This is the Charles River Urban Wilds Initiative. Volunteers can volunteer by talking with one of the feeders at the Destroyed Nesting Area.
In the meantime, as I posted yesterday, the DCR is seeking the support of the Cambridge Machine to expand the existing outrage further west.
The Cambridge Machine is very predictable. They always “mean so well,” and they pretty much always help destructive bureaucrats and pols destroy. But they do a lot of “soul searching” and they “compromise” in the Cambridge Machine tradition. “Compromise” in the Cambridge Machine tradition means the bad guys get to do whatever they want and the “good guys” get to declare victory.
3. Swans in Revere.
Cher:
BTW the swans are gone. Some of the people there were so nasty, I don't know what happened to them at all. One mallard likes me and comes to me if I go out. I never get out more than twice a month.
4. Response.
I hope I got the municipality (Revere) right.
Cher has been caring for swans living on a river feeding into Boston Harbor on property owned by the Department of Conservation and Recreation.
I hope her swan friends decided to migrate. The other alternative is related to the fact that the DCR owns the place and the DCR is destructive to animals. Her swan friends do not have the visibility and constituency of the Charles River White Geese.
Saturday, February 02, 2013
DCR proposes more destruction on the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, USA.
0. Overview.
1. “Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association” hosts environmental destroyer / heartless animal abuser from DCR.
2. Corsi’s presentation.
3. Analysis.
4. Machine analysis.
5. Meeting analysis.
6. Overall analysis.
7. What will happen?
0. Overview.
The key person in the outrage in the Magazine Beach area of the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, gave his plans for the next step on January 30, 2013. He is the key manager of the Department of Conservation and Recreation for Magazine Beach, R. Corsi.
A key factor in the current outrage is years of lies by DCR including but not necessarily limited to R. Corsi that they had “no intention” to do “harm” to the Charles River White Geese.
Corsi wants to extend the last 13 years of outrage westerly from Magazine Beach to the area of the hill to the west of the playing fields and further. His plans would bring one step closer the destruction of hundreds of excellent trees between the Magazine Beach playing fields and the Longfellow Bridge, the third bridge (counting the BU Bridge) east of those playing fields.
Corsi wants to extend the routine dumping of poisons on the banks of the Charles River to at least that hill and, almost certainly, further. Corsi wants to destroy the little parking lot for little guys picnicing on that hill. This parking is at the foot of Magazine Street in Cambridge. Corsi wants to build a small vehicle highway connecting the small vehicle highway installed in Magazine Beach’s playing fields to the environmental outrage which are the plans for the three bridges west of the playing fields. This highway would extend to the east and destroy all those trees.
Corsi (omitting as much fine print as is feasible) calls these goals non negotiable.
The meeting started with the Cambridge Machine stating that it intended to ram through the meeting the meeting’s blessings of Corsi’s plans. Discussion of the situation resulted in action being deferred until the next meeting.
Given 38 years of experience with various fronts of the Cambridge Machine, I am highly skeptical of what will be done by the Cambridge Machine and its front organization on this matter.
1. “Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association” hosts environmental destroyer / heartless animal abuser from DCR.
Wednesday night, January 30, 2013, the “Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association” hosted R. Corsi of the Department of Conservation and Recreation. Corsi is the one individual most personally responsible for the outrage inflicted on Magazine Beach and the Charles River White Geese over the past 13 years.
He was presented by the woman who has spent the last year or so claiming to be fighting for Magazine Beach. She and the rest of the organization does not want to know about the last 13 years. They do want to update a former bath house on the hill west of the playing field outrage.
She has commented that it is a waste of time fighting to undo the outrages of the last 13 years. My translation of her excuse is that the Cambridge City Council is too irresponsible to undo the terrible things they have done. Her approach is to praise people worthy of condemnation in the hope that praise for irresponsible behavior will somehow persuade belligerently irresponsible people to become decent human beings. This is a normal pitch from the Cambridge Machine.
Her explanation of the plans to destroy the parking area for the picnic area around the bath house (at the foot of Magazine Street) has been that they do not have the money yet, so do not worry about it. The normal translation is that they then get the money, destroy and say it is too late to undo the destruction, but they are so sorry.
She and the group have exactly fit the Cambridge Machine mold. They have stood for three things:
A. Improve the bathhouse on top of the hill west of the playing fields,
B. Ignore the plans to destroy the parking lot, and
C. Ignore 13 years of irresponsible behavior, all the time loudly proclaiming concern for everything.
In the meeting, a group associated with her gave the impression they do not want the parking lot destroyed because of its importance to the little guy.
She introduced Corsi saying that she intended to present a motion which sounded like it would bless his efforts.
2. Corsi’s presentation.
Corsi’s explanation for the bizarre wall of introduced bushes was that they got a little bigger than he expected.
Corsi in the past has repeatedly claimed “no intention” to harm the Charles River White Geese. He has bragged that the bizarre wall starves them. He defines “harm” such that harm does not include starving them. So in his irresponsible world, deliberately starving beautiful valuable animals does not mean harming them. These flat out lies were crucial in defusing very major public distress at the initial attacks on these beautiful and very popular animals. The continuation of these lies helped everything else.
Corsi sniffed at the grass at the top of the hill and proudly proclaimed he wants to “improve” that.
Corsi gave the impression that destroying the parking lot is a done deal.
Another done deal is the building of a small vehicle highway through the hill area and the area to the west of the hill and connect it to the small vehicle highway built as part of the outrage over the past 13 years.
He says that Cambridge has to take the DCR’s plans now or be placed at the end of the list.
3. Analysis.
The DCR and the City of Cambridge have proven to be beneath contempt over the past 13 years.
The DCR sanctified Master Plan called for a lawn to the river.
The following has been done, all in violation of or not promised in the sanctified master plan or in any other public discussions.
A. The Magazine Beach playing fields have been walled off from the Charles River with a bizarre wall of introduced bushes which have simply been allowed to grow and grow.
Corsi claims confusion. He does not know how to chop down bushes. He has bragged that this bizarre wall starves the Charles River White Geese.
There were two phases of destruction. Phase 1 left a hole through which the Charles River White Geese fed. Phase 2 filled that hole belligerently.
Corsi brags of gross incompetence. That is his excuse. He does not know how to chop down bushes. The DCR everyplace else knows how to chop down bushes.
Accepting such an excuse by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
B. They destroyed perfectly good grass which had survived the better part of a century and replaced it with sickly stuff that cannot survive without poisons.
Corsi’s claim of wishing to “improve” the grass in the rest of the Magazine Beach area in this latest phase translates into a determination to replace healthy grass with more of his beloved sickly stuff and with the DCR’s beloved poisons.
Accepting such environmental corruption by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
C. They have destroyed significant parts of the playing fields for a complicated drainage system to drain off poisons which are totally unnecessary.
The responsible thing to do is, instead of sewing poisons, sew seed for the grass they destroyed. Then they will be in a position to return the quality of the playing fields to what it was 13 years ago.
Instead, they are sewing more poisons and a need for more drainage.
Accepting such environmental corruption by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
D. They have destroyed the boat dock which had been at Magazine Beach for the better part of a century.
The boat dock is still there. It just cannot be accessed. I live in reality. It has been destroyed.
You undo the silly and unexplained barriers, and you have the boat dock.
Accepting such environmental corruption by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
E. They have heartless abused the Charles River White Geese.
Part of the sanctified Master Plan calls for killing off all resident animals. That is in their secret definition of parkland.
Pretty much every action done in the past 13 years which could be modified to add to the heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese has been so modified.
Accepting such environmental corruption by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
F. The plans.
“Improving the grass” translates into more sickly grass, more poisons, and more drainage to drain off poisons which should not be dumped there in the first place.
The grass at the top of the hill is clearly and significantly superior to the sickly stuff which has been introduced by the DCR and Cambridge. It has survived in an environmentall responsible manner for the better part of a Century. The presence of that fine grass which does not need poisons puts the lie to the claim of the DCR, Cambridge and the Cambridge Machine that the behavior of the last 13 years is the behavior of a responsible government.
The lovely new highway is part of the DCR’s plans to destroy hundreds of trees between Magazine Beach and the Longfellow Bridge. No highway, no excuse to destroy the trees. This includes the decimation of a lovely 104 tree grove at the Memorial Drive split. Most of the rest of the targeted trees are larger than these excellent trees.
The DCR tried to get Obama money for the tree destruction.
They lied that all the trees they wanted to destroy are diseased. The papers they filed with Cambridge on the project proved that position to be yet another flat out lie.
No money came.
No comment was made by Corsi about extending the bizarre wall. No comment was made about extending expensive drainage to drain off poisons which, of course, were not mentioned.
No denials were made either.
None of this should be done. None of this should be extended. It is silly to think that this corrupt agency would behave in a responsible manner.
Accepting such environmental corruption and heartless abuse of valuable, beautiful animals in the past by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
The position of the Cambridge Machine has been that the last 13 years do not exist. Their sanctified friends at the falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” wholeheartedly support and fight for the destruction.
G. Dirty tricks.
Normal. I have better things to do than give a blow by blow of the dirty tricks of the DCR, Cambridge and the Cambridge Machine. As I said, I have been fighting the Cambridge Machine and its various front organizations for 38 years.
4. Machine analysis.
They want to talk to the DCR and get the fine print straight. They could care less about the record of lying, destruction and heartless animal abuse. They want “improvements”.
The Cambridge Machine lives “compromise.” In Cambridge, MA, USA, “compromise” means that the bad guys get to do whatever the bad guys want to do, and the good guys get to declare victory.
After all isn’t that fair?
5. Meeting analysis.
Very skeptical.
The proposed praise and support which was announced at the beginning of the meeting was ignored. Watered down versions were proposed and not voted on.
Final decision was to postpone until next meeting.
Postponing allows the Machine to organize and to create a story to tell to people. It allows the Machine to stack the next meeting with true believers who will obey orders and be oh, so confused. It allows the Machine to wear down people who only wanted to attend one meeting.
6. Overall analysis.
There are major problems in Magazine Beach. Those problems are the irresponsible behavior of the last 13 years.
These problems are exacerbated by the presence of the Cambridge Machine and the very real and very bad record of the Cambridge Machine.
The Cambridge Machine ALWAYS sounds great. The Cambridge Machine routinely, not necessarily always, does the exact opposite.
The DCR proposes to extend 13 years of destruction at the playing fields to the area west of the playing fields.
But the area west of the playing fields, except for the really minor situation of the bath house IS BETTER NOW THAN IS THE PLAYING FIELDS.
It is outrageous to try to dot the I’s and cross the T’s to prevent a repetition of 13 years of destruction and animal abuse with an agency which is a proven liar, has proven to add changes without discussion, has a terrible record of dirty tricks, and which wants to keep 13 years of destruction in place.
The responsible thing to do is insist on undoing 13 years of outrages. It is silly to insist that this time an irresponsible agency will suddenly behave responsibly so that you have
A. Responsible new construction next to and in direct conflict with
B. 13 years of outrage.
Such a combination would be bizarre.
Actually, given the irresponsible record, such an option would be worse than bizarre. It would be outrageously silly.
Such an option, however, would fit the record of the Cambridge Machine on its less irresponsible days.
7. What will happen?
This is the Cambridge Machine. What do you think will happen?
1. “Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association” hosts environmental destroyer / heartless animal abuser from DCR.
2. Corsi’s presentation.
3. Analysis.
4. Machine analysis.
5. Meeting analysis.
6. Overall analysis.
7. What will happen?
0. Overview.
The key person in the outrage in the Magazine Beach area of the Charles River in Cambridge, MA, gave his plans for the next step on January 30, 2013. He is the key manager of the Department of Conservation and Recreation for Magazine Beach, R. Corsi.
A key factor in the current outrage is years of lies by DCR including but not necessarily limited to R. Corsi that they had “no intention” to do “harm” to the Charles River White Geese.
Corsi wants to extend the last 13 years of outrage westerly from Magazine Beach to the area of the hill to the west of the playing fields and further. His plans would bring one step closer the destruction of hundreds of excellent trees between the Magazine Beach playing fields and the Longfellow Bridge, the third bridge (counting the BU Bridge) east of those playing fields.
Corsi wants to extend the routine dumping of poisons on the banks of the Charles River to at least that hill and, almost certainly, further. Corsi wants to destroy the little parking lot for little guys picnicing on that hill. This parking is at the foot of Magazine Street in Cambridge. Corsi wants to build a small vehicle highway connecting the small vehicle highway installed in Magazine Beach’s playing fields to the environmental outrage which are the plans for the three bridges west of the playing fields. This highway would extend to the east and destroy all those trees.
Corsi (omitting as much fine print as is feasible) calls these goals non negotiable.
The meeting started with the Cambridge Machine stating that it intended to ram through the meeting the meeting’s blessings of Corsi’s plans. Discussion of the situation resulted in action being deferred until the next meeting.
Given 38 years of experience with various fronts of the Cambridge Machine, I am highly skeptical of what will be done by the Cambridge Machine and its front organization on this matter.
1. “Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association” hosts environmental destroyer / heartless animal abuser from DCR.
Wednesday night, January 30, 2013, the “Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association” hosted R. Corsi of the Department of Conservation and Recreation. Corsi is the one individual most personally responsible for the outrage inflicted on Magazine Beach and the Charles River White Geese over the past 13 years.
He was presented by the woman who has spent the last year or so claiming to be fighting for Magazine Beach. She and the rest of the organization does not want to know about the last 13 years. They do want to update a former bath house on the hill west of the playing field outrage.
She has commented that it is a waste of time fighting to undo the outrages of the last 13 years. My translation of her excuse is that the Cambridge City Council is too irresponsible to undo the terrible things they have done. Her approach is to praise people worthy of condemnation in the hope that praise for irresponsible behavior will somehow persuade belligerently irresponsible people to become decent human beings. This is a normal pitch from the Cambridge Machine.
Her explanation of the plans to destroy the parking area for the picnic area around the bath house (at the foot of Magazine Street) has been that they do not have the money yet, so do not worry about it. The normal translation is that they then get the money, destroy and say it is too late to undo the destruction, but they are so sorry.
She and the group have exactly fit the Cambridge Machine mold. They have stood for three things:
A. Improve the bathhouse on top of the hill west of the playing fields,
B. Ignore the plans to destroy the parking lot, and
C. Ignore 13 years of irresponsible behavior, all the time loudly proclaiming concern for everything.
In the meeting, a group associated with her gave the impression they do not want the parking lot destroyed because of its importance to the little guy.
She introduced Corsi saying that she intended to present a motion which sounded like it would bless his efforts.
2. Corsi’s presentation.
Corsi’s explanation for the bizarre wall of introduced bushes was that they got a little bigger than he expected.
Corsi in the past has repeatedly claimed “no intention” to harm the Charles River White Geese. He has bragged that the bizarre wall starves them. He defines “harm” such that harm does not include starving them. So in his irresponsible world, deliberately starving beautiful valuable animals does not mean harming them. These flat out lies were crucial in defusing very major public distress at the initial attacks on these beautiful and very popular animals. The continuation of these lies helped everything else.
Corsi sniffed at the grass at the top of the hill and proudly proclaimed he wants to “improve” that.
Corsi gave the impression that destroying the parking lot is a done deal.
Another done deal is the building of a small vehicle highway through the hill area and the area to the west of the hill and connect it to the small vehicle highway built as part of the outrage over the past 13 years.
He says that Cambridge has to take the DCR’s plans now or be placed at the end of the list.
3. Analysis.
The DCR and the City of Cambridge have proven to be beneath contempt over the past 13 years.
The DCR sanctified Master Plan called for a lawn to the river.
The following has been done, all in violation of or not promised in the sanctified master plan or in any other public discussions.
A. The Magazine Beach playing fields have been walled off from the Charles River with a bizarre wall of introduced bushes which have simply been allowed to grow and grow.
Corsi claims confusion. He does not know how to chop down bushes. He has bragged that this bizarre wall starves the Charles River White Geese.
There were two phases of destruction. Phase 1 left a hole through which the Charles River White Geese fed. Phase 2 filled that hole belligerently.
Corsi brags of gross incompetence. That is his excuse. He does not know how to chop down bushes. The DCR everyplace else knows how to chop down bushes.
Accepting such an excuse by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
B. They destroyed perfectly good grass which had survived the better part of a century and replaced it with sickly stuff that cannot survive without poisons.
Corsi’s claim of wishing to “improve” the grass in the rest of the Magazine Beach area in this latest phase translates into a determination to replace healthy grass with more of his beloved sickly stuff and with the DCR’s beloved poisons.
Accepting such environmental corruption by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
C. They have destroyed significant parts of the playing fields for a complicated drainage system to drain off poisons which are totally unnecessary.
The responsible thing to do is, instead of sewing poisons, sew seed for the grass they destroyed. Then they will be in a position to return the quality of the playing fields to what it was 13 years ago.
Instead, they are sewing more poisons and a need for more drainage.
Accepting such environmental corruption by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
D. They have destroyed the boat dock which had been at Magazine Beach for the better part of a century.
The boat dock is still there. It just cannot be accessed. I live in reality. It has been destroyed.
You undo the silly and unexplained barriers, and you have the boat dock.
Accepting such environmental corruption by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
E. They have heartless abused the Charles River White Geese.
Part of the sanctified Master Plan calls for killing off all resident animals. That is in their secret definition of parkland.
Pretty much every action done in the past 13 years which could be modified to add to the heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese has been so modified.
Accepting such environmental corruption by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
F. The plans.
“Improving the grass” translates into more sickly grass, more poisons, and more drainage to drain off poisons which should not be dumped there in the first place.
The grass at the top of the hill is clearly and significantly superior to the sickly stuff which has been introduced by the DCR and Cambridge. It has survived in an environmentall responsible manner for the better part of a Century. The presence of that fine grass which does not need poisons puts the lie to the claim of the DCR, Cambridge and the Cambridge Machine that the behavior of the last 13 years is the behavior of a responsible government.
The lovely new highway is part of the DCR’s plans to destroy hundreds of trees between Magazine Beach and the Longfellow Bridge. No highway, no excuse to destroy the trees. This includes the decimation of a lovely 104 tree grove at the Memorial Drive split. Most of the rest of the targeted trees are larger than these excellent trees.
The DCR tried to get Obama money for the tree destruction.
They lied that all the trees they wanted to destroy are diseased. The papers they filed with Cambridge on the project proved that position to be yet another flat out lie.
No money came.
No comment was made by Corsi about extending the bizarre wall. No comment was made about extending expensive drainage to drain off poisons which, of course, were not mentioned.
No denials were made either.
None of this should be done. None of this should be extended. It is silly to think that this corrupt agency would behave in a responsible manner.
Accepting such environmental corruption and heartless abuse of valuable, beautiful animals in the past by the Cambridge Machine reemphasizes the organizational corruption of the Cambridge Machine.
The position of the Cambridge Machine has been that the last 13 years do not exist. Their sanctified friends at the falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” wholeheartedly support and fight for the destruction.
G. Dirty tricks.
Normal. I have better things to do than give a blow by blow of the dirty tricks of the DCR, Cambridge and the Cambridge Machine. As I said, I have been fighting the Cambridge Machine and its various front organizations for 38 years.
4. Machine analysis.
They want to talk to the DCR and get the fine print straight. They could care less about the record of lying, destruction and heartless animal abuse. They want “improvements”.
The Cambridge Machine lives “compromise.” In Cambridge, MA, USA, “compromise” means that the bad guys get to do whatever the bad guys want to do, and the good guys get to declare victory.
After all isn’t that fair?
5. Meeting analysis.
Very skeptical.
The proposed praise and support which was announced at the beginning of the meeting was ignored. Watered down versions were proposed and not voted on.
Final decision was to postpone until next meeting.
Postponing allows the Machine to organize and to create a story to tell to people. It allows the Machine to stack the next meeting with true believers who will obey orders and be oh, so confused. It allows the Machine to wear down people who only wanted to attend one meeting.
6. Overall analysis.
There are major problems in Magazine Beach. Those problems are the irresponsible behavior of the last 13 years.
These problems are exacerbated by the presence of the Cambridge Machine and the very real and very bad record of the Cambridge Machine.
The Cambridge Machine ALWAYS sounds great. The Cambridge Machine routinely, not necessarily always, does the exact opposite.
The DCR proposes to extend 13 years of destruction at the playing fields to the area west of the playing fields.
But the area west of the playing fields, except for the really minor situation of the bath house IS BETTER NOW THAN IS THE PLAYING FIELDS.
It is outrageous to try to dot the I’s and cross the T’s to prevent a repetition of 13 years of destruction and animal abuse with an agency which is a proven liar, has proven to add changes without discussion, has a terrible record of dirty tricks, and which wants to keep 13 years of destruction in place.
The responsible thing to do is insist on undoing 13 years of outrages. It is silly to insist that this time an irresponsible agency will suddenly behave responsibly so that you have
A. Responsible new construction next to and in direct conflict with
B. 13 years of outrage.
Such a combination would be bizarre.
Actually, given the irresponsible record, such an option would be worse than bizarre. It would be outrageously silly.
Such an option, however, would fit the record of the Cambridge Machine on its less irresponsible days.
7. What will happen?
This is the Cambridge Machine. What do you think will happen?
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Cambridge to Attack the Environment at the Massive Danehy Park?
1. Danehy Park under apparent attack.
2. Councilor Van Beuzekom’s Position (?).
3. Situation in Context. — The very terrible record of the Cambridge City Council
1. Danehy Park under apparent attack.
Seth Teller is organizing around Cambridge considering destruction of the grass in three playing fields at Danehy Park in the western part of Cambridge. His comments follow. There is a lot of automatically introduced characters in the email. I have attempted to edit out the chaff and return what, I hope, he was trying to say:
[Ed. The initial publication lost a lot of intended formatting. I have overkilled trying to make this readable.]
Subject: [ecfg] Save the grass fields at Danehy
Hi neighbors,
Sorry, I seem to be on an activism streak lately. Today's issue:
Cambridge plans to pave *all three grass playing fields* at Danehy with plastic turf. We might
be able to turn this around if we can kick up a big enough storm to get the city council's attention. Please *sign the petition* http://tinyurl.com/keepthegrass to help.
AND please send this email as widely as you can to everyone you know who might care about grass vs. plastic:
soccer/ultimate/field hockey players, dog walkers, whatever. Forget sports -- know anyone that likes to lie out in the sun on some soft grass rather than plastic? Know anyone that flies kites? Goes outside? Forward this to them. http://tinyurl.com/keepthegrass.
Please help fix this.
Thank you.
2. Councilor Van Beuzekom’s Position (?).
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:38 AM
*Subject:* Meeting Scheduled
Good Morning everyone -
A meeting has been scheduled by a committee of the City Council to discuss this further. I hope you will be able to attend so we can all hear what the exact city plans are, what the playing field demands are and what the maintenance on the grass fields has been to date.
February 6th from 4-6pm in City Hall, the Sullivan Chambers on the 2nd floor.
I realize this time is not ideal for working folk so please feel free to submit something in writing prior to the meeting. You can use Council@cambridgema.gov to send your message to all of us or Dlopez@cambridgema.gov to send it to City Clerk as part of the public record.
Thanks for trying to hold a balanced discussion electronically.
Minka vanBeuzekom
your Cambridge City Councillor
cell: 617-894-0370
3. Situation in Context. — The very terrible record of the Cambridge City Council.
The only thing which is consistent about environmental “planning” in and near the City of Cambridge, MA, USA is that the “planners” are as destructive to the environment as a very large and very controlled Cambridge Machine can fool people into suckering for.
I condemned Governor Patrick for assisting the many outrages and, in the process, condemned a really bad city council, at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/patrick-administration-destructiveness.html.
They are so rotten that it is very hard to list everything. Danehy Park is one of the largest formal open space that I am aware of in the City of Cambridge. One outrage I did not mention in the Patrick report is ongoing environmental destruction at Fresh Pond, another very massive area which has been in the process of incremental environmental destruction for several years now. Danehy Park is maybe a block from Fresh Pond at the nearest point.
Danehy Park is perhaps half a mile from the Alewife reservation which Cambridge is aggressively destroying.
Councilor vanBeuzekom appeared in a recent post as an example of the corrupt environment situation. She was making a presentation at one of the typical fake groups bragging about environmental holiness at Fresh Pond. The massive destruction is total waste of trees and animal residents for “flood protection” that project cannot provide, with ample room in nearby properties to provide meaningful flood protection. One meaningful properties has disappeared for use and a second major property is on the verge. The Machine is stalling, telling people to look at a long shot fight on a private developement; how dare anybody stop an eminently stoppable project their friends are doing.
vanBeuzekom was bragging about air quality. She mentioned two key parcels needed for use to prevent the destruction and animal killing, but she did not want to know about reality and her city council’s fight for destruction.
Business as usual in the City of Cambridge, MA, USA.
2. Councilor Van Beuzekom’s Position (?).
3. Situation in Context. — The very terrible record of the Cambridge City Council
1. Danehy Park under apparent attack.
Seth Teller is organizing around Cambridge considering destruction of the grass in three playing fields at Danehy Park in the western part of Cambridge. His comments follow. There is a lot of automatically introduced characters in the email. I have attempted to edit out the chaff and return what, I hope, he was trying to say:
[Ed. The initial publication lost a lot of intended formatting. I have overkilled trying to make this readable.]
Subject: [ecfg] Save the grass fields at Danehy
Hi neighbors,
Sorry, I seem to be on an activism streak lately. Today's issue:
Cambridge plans to pave *all three grass playing fields* at Danehy with plastic turf. We might
be able to turn this around if we can kick up a big enough storm to get the city council's attention. Please *sign the petition* http://tinyurl.com/keepthegrass to help.
AND please send this email as widely as you can to everyone you know who might care about grass vs. plastic:
soccer/ultimate/field hockey players, dog walkers, whatever. Forget sports -- know anyone that likes to lie out in the sun on some soft grass rather than plastic? Know anyone that flies kites? Goes outside? Forward this to them. http://tinyurl.com/keepthegrass.
Please help fix this.
Thank you.
2. Councilor Van Beuzekom’s Position (?).
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:38 AM
*Subject:* Meeting Scheduled
Good Morning everyone -
A meeting has been scheduled by a committee of the City Council to discuss this further. I hope you will be able to attend so we can all hear what the exact city plans are, what the playing field demands are and what the maintenance on the grass fields has been to date.
February 6th from 4-6pm in City Hall, the Sullivan Chambers on the 2nd floor.
I realize this time is not ideal for working folk so please feel free to submit something in writing prior to the meeting. You can use Council@cambridgema.gov to send your message to all of us or Dlopez@cambridgema.gov to send it to City Clerk as part of the public record.
Thanks for trying to hold a balanced discussion electronically.
Minka vanBeuzekom
your Cambridge City Councillor
cell: 617-894-0370
3. Situation in Context. — The very terrible record of the Cambridge City Council.
The only thing which is consistent about environmental “planning” in and near the City of Cambridge, MA, USA is that the “planners” are as destructive to the environment as a very large and very controlled Cambridge Machine can fool people into suckering for.
I condemned Governor Patrick for assisting the many outrages and, in the process, condemned a really bad city council, at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/patrick-administration-destructiveness.html.
They are so rotten that it is very hard to list everything. Danehy Park is one of the largest formal open space that I am aware of in the City of Cambridge. One outrage I did not mention in the Patrick report is ongoing environmental destruction at Fresh Pond, another very massive area which has been in the process of incremental environmental destruction for several years now. Danehy Park is maybe a block from Fresh Pond at the nearest point.
Danehy Park is perhaps half a mile from the Alewife reservation which Cambridge is aggressively destroying.
Councilor vanBeuzekom appeared in a recent post as an example of the corrupt environment situation. She was making a presentation at one of the typical fake groups bragging about environmental holiness at Fresh Pond. The massive destruction is total waste of trees and animal residents for “flood protection” that project cannot provide, with ample room in nearby properties to provide meaningful flood protection. One meaningful properties has disappeared for use and a second major property is on the verge. The Machine is stalling, telling people to look at a long shot fight on a private developement; how dare anybody stop an eminently stoppable project their friends are doing.
vanBeuzekom was bragging about air quality. She mentioned two key parcels needed for use to prevent the destruction and animal killing, but she did not want to know about reality and her city council’s fight for destruction.
Business as usual in the City of Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Patrick Administration Destructiveness in Context
1. Letter to the Editor.
2. Women’s Rights.
3. Environmental Destruction.
1. Letter to the Editor.
I have submitted the following letter to the editor of the Cambridge Chronicle:
Editor
Cambridge Chronicle
Actions by the Patrick administration have dramatically communicated contempt for the environment by Governor Patrick.
Workers on the Commuter Rail bridge under the BU Bridge used for parking the last refuge of the Charles River White Geese to the east of the BU Bridge. If we had a responsible state government, they would have parked under Memorial Drive as did the BU Bridge workers.
This last undestroyed area has had severe past damage by the state’s agents destroying ground vegetation and by sporadic irresponsible parking by state workers.
This time it was five weeks parking by about ten privately owned vehicles starting in early December.
The governor’s response to our complaint was noncommital. In other words, “tough”.
Now the environmentally destructive Charles River “Conservancy” has put out the following report:
*****
Just before the end of 2012 Transportation Secretary Davey issued a change order to the Anderson Bridge and asked for a change to the design of the River St. and Western Av. bridges to clear the path for future underpasses.
*****
This group and friends in the Cambridge Machine have been fighting for destruction of the environment under and adjacent to both sides of these three bridges.
Massive destruction is related to these projects. It includes further heartless attacks on Magazine Beach and the Goose Meadow, plus destruction of the parking lot at the end of Magazine Street and devastation of the magnificent 105 tree grove at the Memorial Drive split.
These actions follow years of outrages at Magazine Beach: walling it off from the Charles River, starvation of the Charles River White Geese, dumping of poisons, decrease of size of the playing fields and destruction of the boat docks, plus the extension of destructive bushes to the Goose Meadow.
These actions follow a totally unnecessary mass animal kill as part of the destruction of acres of Alewife for “flood storage” that project cannot provide but which can be provided under nearby properties. The Machine is stalling enough that many of the nearby properties may be no longer available.
Then you have the mass tree destruction on the Cambridge Common and Flagstaff Park using state money.
There is no longer anything ambiguous about Governor Patrick’s environmental destructiveness. The nicest comparison I can give with regard to the Cambridge Government and the Cambridge Machine is that, at least, there is no reason to think that Governor Patrick has contempt for women’s rights.
2. Women’s Rights.
The corruption of the Cambridge city government is only exceeded by its hypocrisy.
These self proclaimed “holier than thou”’s got a very strong come uppance in the case of Malvina Monteiro v. Cambridge.
Judge, jury and appeals court panel condemned the Cambridge City Manager in no uncertain terms because he destroyed the life of department head Malvina Monteiro in retaliation for her filing a civil rights / women’s rights complaint.
The Cambridge City Council was unambiguous power to fire the Cambridge City Manager for malfeasance in office.
The Cambridge City Council has had exactly zero attempts to do so and exactly zero votes to implement the Court decisions by firing him.
3. Environmental Destruction.
The letter is excessively moderate.
The heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese has been supported by the Patrick administration by its clearly stated indifference to the parking outrage.
My letter was not able to detail the start of an environmental nightmare being increasingly forced on the Charles River White Geese. These 32 year residents of the Charles River have been starved by the bizarre wall of introduced bushes walling off the Magazine Beach playing fields. That bizarre wall is being duplicated in half the tiny area to which they have been heartlessly confined by the planting of such bushes occupying half the area.
The half that has not been under attack by this outrage has just been attacked by the parking of approximately ten privately owned vehicles for five weeks, when a responsible government would have parked those vehicles under the very close Memorial Drive overpass in a parking location used for BU Bridge repairs.
The basic issue is how low can you go that differences are irrelevant.
It is very nice of the Patrick administration not, apparently, joining the corruption of Cambridge in the field of women’s rights, but he really has not had a chance to join that level of corruption. The automatic assumption is that he would never stoop so low. But the outrages listed in my letter to the editor all fall under the “They would never stoop so low” category.
A really, really rotten situation.
2. Women’s Rights.
3. Environmental Destruction.
1. Letter to the Editor.
I have submitted the following letter to the editor of the Cambridge Chronicle:
Editor
Cambridge Chronicle
Actions by the Patrick administration have dramatically communicated contempt for the environment by Governor Patrick.
Workers on the Commuter Rail bridge under the BU Bridge used for parking the last refuge of the Charles River White Geese to the east of the BU Bridge. If we had a responsible state government, they would have parked under Memorial Drive as did the BU Bridge workers.
This last undestroyed area has had severe past damage by the state’s agents destroying ground vegetation and by sporadic irresponsible parking by state workers.
This time it was five weeks parking by about ten privately owned vehicles starting in early December.
The governor’s response to our complaint was noncommital. In other words, “tough”.
Now the environmentally destructive Charles River “Conservancy” has put out the following report:
*****
Just before the end of 2012 Transportation Secretary Davey issued a change order to the Anderson Bridge and asked for a change to the design of the River St. and Western Av. bridges to clear the path for future underpasses.
*****
This group and friends in the Cambridge Machine have been fighting for destruction of the environment under and adjacent to both sides of these three bridges.
Massive destruction is related to these projects. It includes further heartless attacks on Magazine Beach and the Goose Meadow, plus destruction of the parking lot at the end of Magazine Street and devastation of the magnificent 105 tree grove at the Memorial Drive split.
These actions follow years of outrages at Magazine Beach: walling it off from the Charles River, starvation of the Charles River White Geese, dumping of poisons, decrease of size of the playing fields and destruction of the boat docks, plus the extension of destructive bushes to the Goose Meadow.
These actions follow a totally unnecessary mass animal kill as part of the destruction of acres of Alewife for “flood storage” that project cannot provide but which can be provided under nearby properties. The Machine is stalling enough that many of the nearby properties may be no longer available.
Then you have the mass tree destruction on the Cambridge Common and Flagstaff Park using state money.
There is no longer anything ambiguous about Governor Patrick’s environmental destructiveness. The nicest comparison I can give with regard to the Cambridge Government and the Cambridge Machine is that, at least, there is no reason to think that Governor Patrick has contempt for women’s rights.
2. Women’s Rights.
The corruption of the Cambridge city government is only exceeded by its hypocrisy.
These self proclaimed “holier than thou”’s got a very strong come uppance in the case of Malvina Monteiro v. Cambridge.
Judge, jury and appeals court panel condemned the Cambridge City Manager in no uncertain terms because he destroyed the life of department head Malvina Monteiro in retaliation for her filing a civil rights / women’s rights complaint.
The Cambridge City Council was unambiguous power to fire the Cambridge City Manager for malfeasance in office.
The Cambridge City Council has had exactly zero attempts to do so and exactly zero votes to implement the Court decisions by firing him.
3. Environmental Destruction.
The letter is excessively moderate.
The heartless abuse of the Charles River White Geese has been supported by the Patrick administration by its clearly stated indifference to the parking outrage.
My letter was not able to detail the start of an environmental nightmare being increasingly forced on the Charles River White Geese. These 32 year residents of the Charles River have been starved by the bizarre wall of introduced bushes walling off the Magazine Beach playing fields. That bizarre wall is being duplicated in half the tiny area to which they have been heartlessly confined by the planting of such bushes occupying half the area.
The half that has not been under attack by this outrage has just been attacked by the parking of approximately ten privately owned vehicles for five weeks, when a responsible government would have parked those vehicles under the very close Memorial Drive overpass in a parking location used for BU Bridge repairs.
The basic issue is how low can you go that differences are irrelevant.
It is very nice of the Patrick administration not, apparently, joining the corruption of Cambridge in the field of women’s rights, but he really has not had a chance to join that level of corruption. The automatic assumption is that he would never stoop so low. But the outrages listed in my letter to the editor all fall under the “They would never stoop so low” category.
A really, really rotten situation.
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Governor Patrick reaffirms contempt for the Charles River Environment
1. Background, nesting area destruction.
2. Falsely named "Conservancy" brags of further planned destruction.
1. Background, nesting area destruction.
We have several time reported on the outrage at the destroyed nesting area of the Charles River White Geese in which the last refuge of the Charles River White Geese was converted into a parking lot for Commuter Rail workers rather than parking under Memorial Drive where BU Bridge workers parked for years.
This outrage continued for five weeks and will resume whenever they are so irresponsible as to resume their contemptuous behavior.
Communication to the Governor received a “neutral” reply.
Translation: Tough, tough, tough.
We still have some photos which we will post.
2. Falsely named "Conservancy" brags of further planned destruction.
The falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” in a bulk email sent at 5:30 pm on January 25, 2012, reported the following:
***********
Just before the end of 2012 Transportation Secretary Davey issued a change order to the Anderson Bridge and asked for a change to the design of the River St. and Western Av. bridges to clear the path for future underpasses.
***********
These destructive people were fighting for destruction of the environment on both sides of these bridges which are the next three bridges west of the BU Bridge.
It is ambiguous exactly the nature of the destruction. Are they destroying under both ends?
2. Falsely named "Conservancy" brags of further planned destruction.
1. Background, nesting area destruction.
We have several time reported on the outrage at the destroyed nesting area of the Charles River White Geese in which the last refuge of the Charles River White Geese was converted into a parking lot for Commuter Rail workers rather than parking under Memorial Drive where BU Bridge workers parked for years.
This outrage continued for five weeks and will resume whenever they are so irresponsible as to resume their contemptuous behavior.
Communication to the Governor received a “neutral” reply.
Translation: Tough, tough, tough.
We still have some photos which we will post.
2. Falsely named "Conservancy" brags of further planned destruction.
The falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” in a bulk email sent at 5:30 pm on January 25, 2012, reported the following:
***********
Just before the end of 2012 Transportation Secretary Davey issued a change order to the Anderson Bridge and asked for a change to the design of the River St. and Western Av. bridges to clear the path for future underpasses.
***********
These destructive people were fighting for destruction of the environment on both sides of these bridges which are the next three bridges west of the BU Bridge.
It is ambiguous exactly the nature of the destruction. Are they destroying under both ends?
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Good Guys, Bad Guys, and Evil in Cambridge, MA, USA
1. Cambridge Machine: There is no such a thing as bad guys. There are just differences of opinion.
2. Bad guy.
3. Response (also known as censored #1).
4. Summary.
1. Cambridge Machine: There is no such a thing as bad guys. There are just differences of opinion.
The Cambridge Machine is active again.
Now the Cambridge Machine claims to be defending Cambridge against a massive increase in development allowed in Central and Kendall Squares.
As part of this fight, members of the Cambridge Machine have been doing lovely analyses of morality.
The Cambridge Machine is reading from the script.
The Cambridge Machine is objecting to the use of the word "Bad Guys" with regard to the supposed opposition.
I really do not want to spend a lot of time writing yet another response, so here are a bad guy comment and the response (with correction of one type) I sent which was censored from their listserve.
I am only quoting the introductory paragraph.
If I quoted the rest, I would have to go on and on and on.
2. Bad guy.
It isn't a case of bad people vs good people. (Gosh, we are hearing enough of that now with the Newtown killings.) It is best to think of it as different viewpoints on how expansion should occur and on the research on urban growth. It seems that the goal of these postings is to offer the opportunity to discuss the pros and cons of upzoning and city planning in a rational, fact-based manner.
3. Response (also known as censored #1)
The people who tell me "It is just a matter of difference of opinion" tend to have striking problems in that their "opinions" deviate very far from the norm.
Excellent examples of deviating from the norm include
(1) fighting for achieving inexcusable destruction of acres of virgin woodlands at Alewife along with massive killing of their resident animals, and fighting through stalling to make it much worse and
(2) fighting for
(a) the dumping of poisons on the banks of the Charles River to feed sickly grass introduced in place of environmentally responsible grass,
(b) the continuation and worsening of large scale deliberate animal starvation of three decade resident animals on the Charles River and related and accelerating animal abuse targeted at achieving a goal of killing off all resident animals on the Charles River Basin,
(c) the continuation of the bizarre wall blocking access between the Charles River and the Magazine Beach playing fields
(d) the continuation of the destruction of the boat docks at the Magazine Beach playing fields,
(e) the continuation of smaller playing fields to drain off poisons which should not be there, and
(f) fighting for destruction of the parking lot at the foot of Magazine Street without giving any explanation except that they do not have the money yet (while "neglecting" to mention that the destruction will occur immediately after they get the money).
When you combine such behavior with loud proclamations of "concern" which give the impression that the speakers are on the opposite side from the side they are really on, I have very great difficulty calling these outrages "differences of opinion."
And when you look at the fact that the principal tool being used is stalling to allow, through inaction, the opposite to happen from what they claim to stand for, that definitely looks to me like the bad guys.
4. Summary.
The tactics used strike me as an excellent example of Evil.
This is Cambridge, MA, USA.
2. Bad guy.
3. Response (also known as censored #1).
4. Summary.
1. Cambridge Machine: There is no such a thing as bad guys. There are just differences of opinion.
The Cambridge Machine is active again.
Now the Cambridge Machine claims to be defending Cambridge against a massive increase in development allowed in Central and Kendall Squares.
As part of this fight, members of the Cambridge Machine have been doing lovely analyses of morality.
The Cambridge Machine is reading from the script.
The Cambridge Machine is objecting to the use of the word "Bad Guys" with regard to the supposed opposition.
I really do not want to spend a lot of time writing yet another response, so here are a bad guy comment and the response (with correction of one type) I sent which was censored from their listserve.
I am only quoting the introductory paragraph.
If I quoted the rest, I would have to go on and on and on.
2. Bad guy.
It isn't a case of bad people vs good people. (Gosh, we are hearing enough of that now with the Newtown killings.) It is best to think of it as different viewpoints on how expansion should occur and on the research on urban growth. It seems that the goal of these postings is to offer the opportunity to discuss the pros and cons of upzoning and city planning in a rational, fact-based manner.
3. Response (also known as censored #1)
The people who tell me "It is just a matter of difference of opinion" tend to have striking problems in that their "opinions" deviate very far from the norm.
Excellent examples of deviating from the norm include
(1) fighting for achieving inexcusable destruction of acres of virgin woodlands at Alewife along with massive killing of their resident animals, and fighting through stalling to make it much worse and
(2) fighting for
(a) the dumping of poisons on the banks of the Charles River to feed sickly grass introduced in place of environmentally responsible grass,
(b) the continuation and worsening of large scale deliberate animal starvation of three decade resident animals on the Charles River and related and accelerating animal abuse targeted at achieving a goal of killing off all resident animals on the Charles River Basin,
(c) the continuation of the bizarre wall blocking access between the Charles River and the Magazine Beach playing fields
(d) the continuation of the destruction of the boat docks at the Magazine Beach playing fields,
(e) the continuation of smaller playing fields to drain off poisons which should not be there, and
(f) fighting for destruction of the parking lot at the foot of Magazine Street without giving any explanation except that they do not have the money yet (while "neglecting" to mention that the destruction will occur immediately after they get the money).
When you combine such behavior with loud proclamations of "concern" which give the impression that the speakers are on the opposite side from the side they are really on, I have very great difficulty calling these outrages "differences of opinion."
And when you look at the fact that the principal tool being used is stalling to allow, through inaction, the opposite to happen from what they claim to stand for, that definitely looks to me like the bad guys.
4. Summary.
The tactics used strike me as an excellent example of Evil.
This is Cambridge, MA, USA.
Friday, January 18, 2013
Cambridge, MA, proposed environmental destruction on its Common - v. 2. Destruction at Alewife
1. Introduction.
2. Final version of Cambridge Common Letter.
3. Addendum.
1. Introduction.
About a week ago, I posted a proposed letter to the editor of the Cambridge Chronicle concerning an article they printed in their January 10 edition about Cambridge’s proposal to destroy 22 to 100 excellent trees in the Cambridge Common and the adjacent Flagstaff Park.
I rewrote the letter with some major stylistic improvements while keeping the content consistent. It was published in the hard copy edition on January 17. It was printed on the oped page, the middle of three editorial pages. Final version is below.
I got in as much as much as was feasible about the outrages at Alewife and on the Charles. The big problem with the Charles is that the outrages are so massive and so major that mentioning the problem is very difficult to do in a few words.
The woman who has led the fight for Alewife destruction for 15 years submitted her own con game letter, as usual telling people concerned about Alewife to look at the other guy off in the periphery. As usual, her pitch is to ignore Cambridge / Department of Conservation and Recreation and the reality of probable total destruction. Her latest con game letter was printed on line but not in the hard copy.
2. Final version of Cambridge Common Letter.
Editor
Cambridge Chronicle
You report on Cambridge’s proposal for environmental destruction on Cambridge Common and in the adjacent Flagstaff Park.
You quote a city representative as saying that “some of the [20] trees [being destroyed] are diseased.”
A different reality exists in Cambridge’s Environmental Impact Statement.
The EIS in the second paragraph on the fourth page says: “To create this path and visual connection twenty-two trees will be removed.”
The short explanation of the “visual connection” being created is that the planners are disturbed that trees are blocking the monument view. So they destroy those trees.
NO MENTION OF DISEASED TREES appears in the ENF.
Responsible people consider trees to be the view. Contrary to this normal mentality is the attitude among Cambridge planners that trees block views. Such a position in the ENF is outrageous. Adding “diseased” allegations apparently out of whole cloth is even worse.
Apparently after funding the destruction , the city council passed a motion submitted by Councilor Kelley which stated “The Cambridge Common renovation project plans to remove close to one hundred significantly sized trees.” Perhaps the looksee you report corrected a misunderstanding. However, the Cambridge City Manager routinely keeps secret environmental destruction.
The highway proposal through Flagstaff Park goes through an area with very significant trees. That highway project is mentioned in the ENF.
This mention of the highway with no more could be the City Manager’s usual mention of destruction without mentioning the destruction. The City Manager claims it is the duty of responsible people to cross examine his proposals and to find what he has kept secret.
If Kelley were correct, destruction of those Flagstaff Park trees could help explain the difference between the 22 HEALTHY TREES which are admittedly being destroyed for blocking the view and the nearly 100 healthy trees Kelley mentioned being destroyed.
In any case, contrary to the diseased nonsense and at absolute minimum, 22 healthy trees are being destroyed because they block the view.
Cambridge’s bizarre priorities fit its destruction of acres of Alewife’s virgin woodlands and killing hundreds of animals for a “flood protection” project which will not protect against floods. Alewife flood protection can and should be done on nearby properties. Environmental destruction is unnecessary.
Cambridge’s bizarre priorities fit multiple outrages on the Charles River which are in the process of being made worse.
Business as usual in Cambridge, MA, USA.
3. Addendum.
This update as originally published erroneously omitted the final three paragraphs printed in the Cambridge Chronicle. On January 20, 2013, I have updated the report to make it correct.
For the record as well, the letter since its hard copy publishing on Thursday, January 17, has been added to the on line record as well on, I think, January 19.
2. Final version of Cambridge Common Letter.
3. Addendum.
1. Introduction.
About a week ago, I posted a proposed letter to the editor of the Cambridge Chronicle concerning an article they printed in their January 10 edition about Cambridge’s proposal to destroy 22 to 100 excellent trees in the Cambridge Common and the adjacent Flagstaff Park.
I rewrote the letter with some major stylistic improvements while keeping the content consistent. It was published in the hard copy edition on January 17. It was printed on the oped page, the middle of three editorial pages. Final version is below.
I got in as much as much as was feasible about the outrages at Alewife and on the Charles. The big problem with the Charles is that the outrages are so massive and so major that mentioning the problem is very difficult to do in a few words.
The woman who has led the fight for Alewife destruction for 15 years submitted her own con game letter, as usual telling people concerned about Alewife to look at the other guy off in the periphery. As usual, her pitch is to ignore Cambridge / Department of Conservation and Recreation and the reality of probable total destruction. Her latest con game letter was printed on line but not in the hard copy.
2. Final version of Cambridge Common Letter.
Editor
Cambridge Chronicle
You report on Cambridge’s proposal for environmental destruction on Cambridge Common and in the adjacent Flagstaff Park.
You quote a city representative as saying that “some of the [20] trees [being destroyed] are diseased.”
A different reality exists in Cambridge’s Environmental Impact Statement.
The EIS in the second paragraph on the fourth page says: “To create this path and visual connection twenty-two trees will be removed.”
The short explanation of the “visual connection” being created is that the planners are disturbed that trees are blocking the monument view. So they destroy those trees.
NO MENTION OF DISEASED TREES appears in the ENF.
Responsible people consider trees to be the view. Contrary to this normal mentality is the attitude among Cambridge planners that trees block views. Such a position in the ENF is outrageous. Adding “diseased” allegations apparently out of whole cloth is even worse.
Apparently after funding the destruction , the city council passed a motion submitted by Councilor Kelley which stated “The Cambridge Common renovation project plans to remove close to one hundred significantly sized trees.” Perhaps the looksee you report corrected a misunderstanding. However, the Cambridge City Manager routinely keeps secret environmental destruction.
The highway proposal through Flagstaff Park goes through an area with very significant trees. That highway project is mentioned in the ENF.
This mention of the highway with no more could be the City Manager’s usual mention of destruction without mentioning the destruction. The City Manager claims it is the duty of responsible people to cross examine his proposals and to find what he has kept secret.
If Kelley were correct, destruction of those Flagstaff Park trees could help explain the difference between the 22 HEALTHY TREES which are admittedly being destroyed for blocking the view and the nearly 100 healthy trees Kelley mentioned being destroyed.
In any case, contrary to the diseased nonsense and at absolute minimum, 22 healthy trees are being destroyed because they block the view.
Cambridge’s bizarre priorities fit its destruction of acres of Alewife’s virgin woodlands and killing hundreds of animals for a “flood protection” project which will not protect against floods. Alewife flood protection can and should be done on nearby properties. Environmental destruction is unnecessary.
Cambridge’s bizarre priorities fit multiple outrages on the Charles River which are in the process of being made worse.
Business as usual in Cambridge, MA, USA.
3. Addendum.
This update as originally published erroneously omitted the final three paragraphs printed in the Cambridge Chronicle. On January 20, 2013, I have updated the report to make it correct.
For the record as well, the letter since its hard copy publishing on Thursday, January 17, has been added to the on line record as well on, I think, January 19.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Governor Leval Patrick talks “Infrastructure.” Photos of destructive reality.
1. Lovely Words From Governor Patrick.
2. Destroyed Nesting Area, December 14, 2012.
3. Boston Globe: Yet more puffery, passing on Cambridge / DCR’s lies of Responsible Behavior.
4. Alewife, February 16, 2012, Acres of Destruction and Animal Killing.
5. Magazine Beach, destroying by green, August 15, 2012.
6. Summary.
7. Contacts.
1. Lovely Words From Governor Patrick.
Last night, January 16, 2013, Governor Patrick gave his State of the State Address.
He made a lot of noise about infrastructure and money to create it.
Reality is a very destructive use of money destroying infrastructure on one hand and laziness abetting a very destructive state agency in its destructiveness on the other.
His lovely words did mirror the lovely words aimed toward him at the Senator Warren ceremonial swearing in.
[01-10, Walgr; 20-01, 01-05, Warren]
Sorry this photo is so dark. The other five did not come out at all. I was carrying my analog camera.
Please also see my report of January 6, 2013, the day after, at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/day-403-patrick-administration-rotten.html.
My preliminary report and photos, including before and after may be viewed at: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/bureaucrats-allow-railroad-to-raise.html, and at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/bureaucrats-allow-railroad-to-raise.html. The latter were taken on December 12, 2012.
2. Destroyed Nesting Area, December 14, 2012.
[01-10, Walgr; 01-20, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 02-19, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 03-18, 12-14, DNA]
The lower structure in the background is Memorial Drive. Responsible people would be parking under it. The BU Bridge workers parked there for a period of years during that project. But flat out lies work in the City of Cambridge.
[01-10, Walgr; 04-17, 12-14, DNA]
The structure in the background is the BU Bridge.
[01-10, Walgr; 05-16, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 06-15, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 07-14, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 09-12, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 10-11, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 11-10, 12-14, DNA]
3. Boston Globe: Yet more puffery, passing on Cambridge / DCR’s lies of Responsible Behavior.
The basis of the following report was received while I was working on the current report:
THE DESTROYED NESTING AREA AND THE CHARLES RIVER WHITE GEESE ARE BY THE BOSTON GLOBE SHOWN AS A MODEL OF WHY CAMBRIDGE IS HOLIER THAN THOU.
http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/boston-globe-uses-outrageous-falsity-in.html.
4. Alewife, February 16, 2012, Acres of Destruction and Animal Killing.
Please see my report with photos at: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/cambridge-pols-destroy-alewife-photo.html.
5. Magazine Beach, destroying by green, August 15, 2012.
Please see my report with photos at: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/08/magazine-beach-using-vegetation-for.html.
6. Summary.
I had hoped for decency and honor from Governor Patrick. This was because he may have vetoed Obama moneys to destroy hundreds of excellent trees on Memorial Drive between Magazine Beach and the third bridge to the east, the Longfellow Bridge. In not at all surprising behavior, the application was based on key lies from the Department of Conservation and Recreation. They filed papers with Cambridge saying that all the trees were healthy. The public lies talked diseased trees.
The Boston Globe printed a report on it, quoting the lies from the DCR without question in the form of: How dare you disagree with these [flat out liars].
Patrick has been made aware of the latest laziness induced outrage at the Destroyed Nesting Area. His response was neutral, fitting the rottenness in Cambridge and from the DCR.
7. Contacts.
Governor Leval Patrick: 617-725-4005; http://www.mass.gov/governor/constituentservices/contact/.
MBTA, manager of commuter rail: http://www.mbta.com/customer_support/feedback/.
Massachusetts Department of Transportation: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/ContactUs.aspx.
Massachusetts Department of Transportation: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/ContactUs.aspx.
2. Destroyed Nesting Area, December 14, 2012.
3. Boston Globe: Yet more puffery, passing on Cambridge / DCR’s lies of Responsible Behavior.
4. Alewife, February 16, 2012, Acres of Destruction and Animal Killing.
5. Magazine Beach, destroying by green, August 15, 2012.
6. Summary.
7. Contacts.
1. Lovely Words From Governor Patrick.
Last night, January 16, 2013, Governor Patrick gave his State of the State Address.
He made a lot of noise about infrastructure and money to create it.
Reality is a very destructive use of money destroying infrastructure on one hand and laziness abetting a very destructive state agency in its destructiveness on the other.
His lovely words did mirror the lovely words aimed toward him at the Senator Warren ceremonial swearing in.
[01-10, Walgr; 20-01, 01-05, Warren]
Sorry this photo is so dark. The other five did not come out at all. I was carrying my analog camera.
Please also see my report of January 6, 2013, the day after, at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/day-403-patrick-administration-rotten.html.
My preliminary report and photos, including before and after may be viewed at: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/bureaucrats-allow-railroad-to-raise.html, and at http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/bureaucrats-allow-railroad-to-raise.html. The latter were taken on December 12, 2012.
2. Destroyed Nesting Area, December 14, 2012.
[01-10, Walgr; 01-20, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 02-19, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 03-18, 12-14, DNA]
The lower structure in the background is Memorial Drive. Responsible people would be parking under it. The BU Bridge workers parked there for a period of years during that project. But flat out lies work in the City of Cambridge.
[01-10, Walgr; 04-17, 12-14, DNA]
The structure in the background is the BU Bridge.
[01-10, Walgr; 05-16, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 06-15, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 07-14, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 09-12, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 10-11, 12-14, DNA]
[01-10, Walgr; 11-10, 12-14, DNA]
3. Boston Globe: Yet more puffery, passing on Cambridge / DCR’s lies of Responsible Behavior.
The basis of the following report was received while I was working on the current report:
THE DESTROYED NESTING AREA AND THE CHARLES RIVER WHITE GEESE ARE BY THE BOSTON GLOBE SHOWN AS A MODEL OF WHY CAMBRIDGE IS HOLIER THAN THOU.
http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/boston-globe-uses-outrageous-falsity-in.html.
4. Alewife, February 16, 2012, Acres of Destruction and Animal Killing.
Please see my report with photos at: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/cambridge-pols-destroy-alewife-photo.html.
5. Magazine Beach, destroying by green, August 15, 2012.
Please see my report with photos at: http://charlesriverwhitegeeseblog.blogspot.com/2012/08/magazine-beach-using-vegetation-for.html.
6. Summary.
I had hoped for decency and honor from Governor Patrick. This was because he may have vetoed Obama moneys to destroy hundreds of excellent trees on Memorial Drive between Magazine Beach and the third bridge to the east, the Longfellow Bridge. In not at all surprising behavior, the application was based on key lies from the Department of Conservation and Recreation. They filed papers with Cambridge saying that all the trees were healthy. The public lies talked diseased trees.
The Boston Globe printed a report on it, quoting the lies from the DCR without question in the form of: How dare you disagree with these [flat out liars].
Patrick has been made aware of the latest laziness induced outrage at the Destroyed Nesting Area. His response was neutral, fitting the rottenness in Cambridge and from the DCR.
7. Contacts.
Governor Leval Patrick: 617-725-4005; http://www.mass.gov/governor/constituentservices/contact/.
MBTA, manager of commuter rail: http://www.mbta.com/customer_support/feedback/.
Massachusetts Department of Transportation: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/ContactUs.aspx.
Massachusetts Department of Transportation: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/ContactUs.aspx.
Boston Globe uses outrageous falsity in Puffery about Cambridge
Thank you to Phil Barber for pointing out the following from the Boston Globe in December 2012:
The lies which Cambridge puts out about itself are multiplied by unknowing reporters repeating those lies.
It is silly to call the repeat of the lies by the Cambridge Machine “unknowing.”
Cambridge and the DCR are doing everything they can, in particular, to kill off the Charles River White Geese.
My current series of reports provides multiple photos about the latest outrage in this exact location.
It is the goal of Cambridge and the Department of Conservation and Recreation to kill off all resident animals on the Charles River.
Cambridge and the DCR have indulged in October - November 2011 in a massive destruction of acres of Alewife including a pogrom of hundreds of resident animals.
I have done a series of reports on the latest outrage. I will follow shortly with a detailed update with new photos and links to old photos
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Days 407 and 408. Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese looks bad
We conducted visibilities on Monday and Tuesday, January 14 and 15, days 407 and 408, at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese on the Charles River at the intersection of the BU Bridge and its on ramp to Memorial Drive in Cambridge, MA, USA.
It looks bad.
Both days we were there in early rush hour, after, apparently, the railroad’s workers left.
On Monday, the gaggle was huddled against the BU Bridge at the bottom of the slope and near the Charles River. They moved closer to the tree they have lived their life under since the Department of Conservation and Recreation and Cambridge started deliberately starving them by walling off Magazine Beach. They did not go all the way. They huddled against the Charles River in an area that was densely vegetated until the falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” started destroying the environment for the DCR.
On Tuesday, they were in the second location when I came and moved up the artificially created undeveloped area by the BU Bridge when a couple of good people came, perhaps with needed food.
The ground which has been their main habitat since the start of starvation looks like a solid floor. It is hard to believe that the destruction which existed before could be made worse, but it has been made significantly worse, apparently unhabitable.
It is possible that these irresponsible people have finished their job and left to leave additional destruction to someone else.
The reality is that the BU Bridge workers, except for the plans from the DCR, functioned responsibly. The task was transferred to the Massachusetts Department of Transportation after most of the task was dictated by a really irresponsible agency. MassDOT did not implement the DCR’s goals of killing off all animals any more than was dictated by the DCR and Cambridge.
This latest phase from Commuter Rail with DCR blessing is inexcusable, downright rotten, behavior. This latest phase is consistent with the rotten situation in the City of Cambridge and with regard to Cambridge’s multiple irresponsible cohorts.
It looks bad.
Both days we were there in early rush hour, after, apparently, the railroad’s workers left.
On Monday, the gaggle was huddled against the BU Bridge at the bottom of the slope and near the Charles River. They moved closer to the tree they have lived their life under since the Department of Conservation and Recreation and Cambridge started deliberately starving them by walling off Magazine Beach. They did not go all the way. They huddled against the Charles River in an area that was densely vegetated until the falsely named Charles River “Conservancy” started destroying the environment for the DCR.
On Tuesday, they were in the second location when I came and moved up the artificially created undeveloped area by the BU Bridge when a couple of good people came, perhaps with needed food.
The ground which has been their main habitat since the start of starvation looks like a solid floor. It is hard to believe that the destruction which existed before could be made worse, but it has been made significantly worse, apparently unhabitable.
It is possible that these irresponsible people have finished their job and left to leave additional destruction to someone else.
The reality is that the BU Bridge workers, except for the plans from the DCR, functioned responsibly. The task was transferred to the Massachusetts Department of Transportation after most of the task was dictated by a really irresponsible agency. MassDOT did not implement the DCR’s goals of killing off all animals any more than was dictated by the DCR and Cambridge.
This latest phase from Commuter Rail with DCR blessing is inexcusable, downright rotten, behavior. This latest phase is consistent with the rotten situation in the City of Cambridge and with regard to Cambridge’s multiple irresponsible cohorts.
Monday, January 14, 2013
Days 405 and 406 at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese: Corruption
1. Days 405 and 406 at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
2. Types of destruction.
3. Corruption.
1. Days 405 and 406 at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
On Saturday, January 12 and Sunday, January 13, I conducted visibilities at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
They were huddled almost in their favorite part of the world, under the big tree kitty corner from the entrance illegally built by Boston University at BU Bridge and the On Ramp to Memorial Drive.
This Saturday, there were no workers destroying their home. They rested between the formerly natural area which has irresponsibly been turned into a parking lot, to their north, and the Charles River to the south.
2. Types of destruction.
This outrage has clarified that there are two types of environmental destruction going on.
There is the deliberate type achieved by the falsely named Charles River “Conservancy.” Since they started destroy the environment for the Department of Conservation and Recreation, almost all ground vegetation has been destroyed between the BU Bridge and the BU Boathouse a block (2/10 mile?) to the east. In the nesting area, this has meant the deforestation of the ground under all trees, including the killing of vegetation used for nesting.
But the irresponsibility of the CRC has been accelerated by vehicles driving over larger, more organized areas including areas which have been coming back from destruction. Clearly, looking at these irresponsible workers, such rotten behavior has been a very major factor in destruction as well.
3. Corruption.
I had a pleasant conversation with a gentleman taking photographs.
He had very clear and very negative opinions about how Cambridge, MA, is run. He used the word “corruption.” I agreed with him but corrected him.
The City of Cambridge, I said, is too corrupt for the stereotypical municipal definition of corruption to apply. The situation is too corrupt to make payoffs have any sense.
The fake groups are white collar corruption. These subtly but very really controlled groups lie that they are independent and control well meaning people while stabbing them in the back.
The achieved destruction and massive animal killing at Alewife with the fake groups working to make the situation that much worse is one excellent example.
Locally the problem is the continued destruction on the Charles with its own fake group who lie about “concern” but
a. do not want to know about reality,
b. do not want to know about the ongoing and increasing heartless animal abuse and irresponsible environmental destruction
c. while fighting to make things worse
strikes very close to home as well.
If you are lying about which side you are on and fooling well meaning people to destroy the causes for which they stand, you are corrupt. In Cambridge, MA, USA, corruption is the norm.
2. Types of destruction.
3. Corruption.
1. Days 405 and 406 at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
On Saturday, January 12 and Sunday, January 13, I conducted visibilities at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
They were huddled almost in their favorite part of the world, under the big tree kitty corner from the entrance illegally built by Boston University at BU Bridge and the On Ramp to Memorial Drive.
This Saturday, there were no workers destroying their home. They rested between the formerly natural area which has irresponsibly been turned into a parking lot, to their north, and the Charles River to the south.
2. Types of destruction.
This outrage has clarified that there are two types of environmental destruction going on.
There is the deliberate type achieved by the falsely named Charles River “Conservancy.” Since they started destroy the environment for the Department of Conservation and Recreation, almost all ground vegetation has been destroyed between the BU Bridge and the BU Boathouse a block (2/10 mile?) to the east. In the nesting area, this has meant the deforestation of the ground under all trees, including the killing of vegetation used for nesting.
But the irresponsibility of the CRC has been accelerated by vehicles driving over larger, more organized areas including areas which have been coming back from destruction. Clearly, looking at these irresponsible workers, such rotten behavior has been a very major factor in destruction as well.
3. Corruption.
I had a pleasant conversation with a gentleman taking photographs.
He had very clear and very negative opinions about how Cambridge, MA, is run. He used the word “corruption.” I agreed with him but corrected him.
The City of Cambridge, I said, is too corrupt for the stereotypical municipal definition of corruption to apply. The situation is too corrupt to make payoffs have any sense.
The fake groups are white collar corruption. These subtly but very really controlled groups lie that they are independent and control well meaning people while stabbing them in the back.
The achieved destruction and massive animal killing at Alewife with the fake groups working to make the situation that much worse is one excellent example.
Locally the problem is the continued destruction on the Charles with its own fake group who lie about “concern” but
a. do not want to know about reality,
b. do not want to know about the ongoing and increasing heartless animal abuse and irresponsible environmental destruction
c. while fighting to make things worse
strikes very close to home as well.
If you are lying about which side you are on and fooling well meaning people to destroy the causes for which they stand, you are corrupt. In Cambridge, MA, USA, corruption is the norm.
Friday, January 11, 2013
Day 404, plus Environmental Destruction on the Cambridge Common
1. Day 404 at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
2. Cambridge Chronicle notices Cambridge Common.
1. Day 404 at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
On January 10, I conducted day 404 of our visibilities at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese. I had good response including one gentleman who has been a regular.
The area turned into an irresponsible parking lot includes a very significant portion which is now a quagmire. We have had a freeze followed by a thaw.
The gaggle of the Charles River White Geese rested on the ground on the safe side of their favorite spot, now parking. When the workers left, the gaggle moved to the artificial emptiness next to the BU Bridge where they rested. Was the original spot a plea to decency from people with no ethics?
2. Cambridge Chronicle notices Cambridge Common.
The January 10, 2013 edition of the Cambridge Chronicle modestly front paged a report on the proposed destruction on the Cambridge Common.
I have submitted the following letter. I enclosed copies of the Environmental Notification Form and of the Kelley motion mentioned in the letter. Two typos corrected.
************
RE: Cambridge Common Environmental Destruction: Cambridge words and reality.
You have reported on Cambridge’s latest foray into environmental destruction.
This time, it is on Cambridge Common and Flagstaff Park.
The report quotes a city representative as saying that 20 trees will be destroyed, “some of the [20] trees are diseased.”
Interestingly, as is very common with Cambridge environmental destruction, a different reality occurs when you look at the official documents.
The Environmental Impact Statement in the second paragraph on the fourth page says:
“To create this path and visual connection twenty-two trees will be removed.” The short version of “visual connection” is that the planners are disturbed that trees are blocking the view. NO MENTION OF DISEASED TREES AMONG THE 22 appears in the ENF. Contrary to this normal mentality among city planners, responsible people consider trees to be the view. Such a position by Cambridge “planners” is nothing less than outrageous, but is highly normal among these people.
The city council passed a motion on this matter submitted by Councilor Kelley on November 5, which stated: “The Cambridge Common renovation project plans to remove close to one hundred significantly sized trees.” Perhaps the looksee corrected a misunderstanding by the Cambridge City Council. However, the Cambridge City Manager has routinely kept secret as much environmental destruction as he can get away with.
The highway proposal through Flagstaff Park goes through an area with very significant trees. That highway project is mentioned in the ENF. This mention of the highway with no more could be the City Manager’s usual mention of destruction without mentioning the destruction. The City Manager thinks it is the duty of responsible people to cross examine the City Manager and to find what he has kept secret.
If Councilor Kelley was correct, those magnificent trees could explain the difference between the 22 HEALTHY TREES which are being destroyed for blocking the view and the 100 he mentioned.
In any case, contrary to the diseased nonsense and at absolute minimum, 22 healthy trees are being destroyed because they block the view.
This bizarre level of priorities fits Cambridge’s destruction of acres of Alewife and killing hundreds of animals for a “flood protection” project which will not protect against floods but which meaningfully could be done on nearby properties without any environmental destruction.
This bizarre level of priorities fits multiple outrages on the Charles River which are in the process of being made much worse.
Business as usual in the City of Cambridge.
2. Cambridge Chronicle notices Cambridge Common.
1. Day 404 at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese.
On January 10, I conducted day 404 of our visibilities at the Destroyed Nesting Area of the Charles River White Geese. I had good response including one gentleman who has been a regular.
The area turned into an irresponsible parking lot includes a very significant portion which is now a quagmire. We have had a freeze followed by a thaw.
The gaggle of the Charles River White Geese rested on the ground on the safe side of their favorite spot, now parking. When the workers left, the gaggle moved to the artificial emptiness next to the BU Bridge where they rested. Was the original spot a plea to decency from people with no ethics?
2. Cambridge Chronicle notices Cambridge Common.
The January 10, 2013 edition of the Cambridge Chronicle modestly front paged a report on the proposed destruction on the Cambridge Common.
I have submitted the following letter. I enclosed copies of the Environmental Notification Form and of the Kelley motion mentioned in the letter. Two typos corrected.
************
RE: Cambridge Common Environmental Destruction: Cambridge words and reality.
You have reported on Cambridge’s latest foray into environmental destruction.
This time, it is on Cambridge Common and Flagstaff Park.
The report quotes a city representative as saying that 20 trees will be destroyed, “some of the [20] trees are diseased.”
Interestingly, as is very common with Cambridge environmental destruction, a different reality occurs when you look at the official documents.
The Environmental Impact Statement in the second paragraph on the fourth page says:
“To create this path and visual connection twenty-two trees will be removed.” The short version of “visual connection” is that the planners are disturbed that trees are blocking the view. NO MENTION OF DISEASED TREES AMONG THE 22 appears in the ENF. Contrary to this normal mentality among city planners, responsible people consider trees to be the view. Such a position by Cambridge “planners” is nothing less than outrageous, but is highly normal among these people.
The city council passed a motion on this matter submitted by Councilor Kelley on November 5, which stated: “The Cambridge Common renovation project plans to remove close to one hundred significantly sized trees.” Perhaps the looksee corrected a misunderstanding by the Cambridge City Council. However, the Cambridge City Manager has routinely kept secret as much environmental destruction as he can get away with.
The highway proposal through Flagstaff Park goes through an area with very significant trees. That highway project is mentioned in the ENF. This mention of the highway with no more could be the City Manager’s usual mention of destruction without mentioning the destruction. The City Manager thinks it is the duty of responsible people to cross examine the City Manager and to find what he has kept secret.
If Councilor Kelley was correct, those magnificent trees could explain the difference between the 22 HEALTHY TREES which are being destroyed for blocking the view and the 100 he mentioned.
In any case, contrary to the diseased nonsense and at absolute minimum, 22 healthy trees are being destroyed because they block the view.
This bizarre level of priorities fits Cambridge’s destruction of acres of Alewife and killing hundreds of animals for a “flood protection” project which will not protect against floods but which meaningfully could be done on nearby properties without any environmental destruction.
This bizarre level of priorities fits multiple outrages on the Charles River which are in the process of being made much worse.
Business as usual in the City of Cambridge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)